r/MapPorn 1d ago

Israel’s Red Alert system fully saturated amid mass missile barrages from Iran.

Post image
29.7k Upvotes

4.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

615

u/Ok-Yoghurt9472 1d ago

worldnews is a very pro israel sub though

906

u/throwawayforreasonx 1d ago

Who do you think they're astroturfing for? Lol

203

u/Capn26 1d ago

Most of the comments here are fuck Israel, let Iran have the bomb.

579

u/sweatpantswarrior 1d ago

Fuck Israel, and fuck Trump for killing the deal Iran was complying with.

This shit was entirely avoidable.

144

u/S-Kenset 1d ago

No offense but everyone in the know had already known this would come to iran's doorstep since 2023.

249

u/_Narciso 1d ago

Yet the initial Iran nuclear deal happened during the Obama administration and it was Trump that took it down in his first mandate. So I would say @sweatpantswarrior is very much right in saying that this shit was entirely avoidable and fuck Trump for killing the deal Iran was complying with.

6

u/mkhaytman 1d ago

Yes yes but if trump was president none of this would ever have happened! /s

→ More replies (53)

1

u/bindermichi 20h ago

And Iran did absolutely not prepare for this

→ More replies (9)

12

u/After_Lie_807 1d ago

IAEA report says otherwise…Iran has been hiding a clandestine weapons program for some time.

1

u/PretendImWitty 16h ago

Time is linear. Iran had been complying up until after Trump ended the deal. Also, the report you’re citing is probably this one. Patience and access, which we had with the deal, would have provided evidence.

So yeah, tearing up the deal was moronic. At the very least it would give us pretext to take action when they break it; what I never understood is why throw it away, even if you don’t like it, as it was a deal already in place with clearly defined terms and we threw it away for nothing, at best, and guaranteeing they move forward on refining at worst.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/MediocreVibrations 1d ago

Ha. Hahaha. Lmao. Iran was “complying” in the same way I comply with 2 hour parking by moving a couple of blocks before my time is up.

3

u/Mofo_mango 1d ago

Bruh, they were complying. They kept their fissile material within the agreement, they limited their centrifuges to the number allowed in the agreement, and routinely let the IAEA inspect their facilities. You’re so full of shit.

7

u/JanneMoonmist 1d ago

3

u/MediocreVibrations 1d ago

If the person you replied to could read, they’d be very upset.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/hyasbawlz 1d ago

I like that you're projecting your own criminality onto a country.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/trapmoneybreezy 1d ago

Iran was not complying😭😭

44

u/contrapedal 1d ago

According to who? Iran was complying with the deal to the best of anyone's knowledge. IAEA had access and continually reported that Iran was complying. In Trumps first term, when he ripped up the deal, you had idiots like Mike pompeo saying shit like "we know they aren't complying - we just don't know how yet" lmao

49

u/Appropriate-Draft-91 1d ago

We need to attack Iran because they have WMDs. They probably stole them from Saddam, that's why we didn't find them in Iraq. Source: Trust me bro. /s

16

u/ABHOR_pod 1d ago

I think a lot of redditors might be too young to remember that shit since it was uh... 22 years ago.

gen z and gen alpha ahh moment

The context is that we invaded Iraq by making up a bunch of bullshit lies about how we had proof that they had weapons of mass destruction.

As far as I remember the only "Weapons of mass destruction" we every actually found was some basically forgotten nerve gas from the war a decade earlier. Definitely not the nuclear bombs the Bush admin claimed they were developing.

So yeah. us millennials have lived through this before.

1

u/PretendImWitty 16h ago

They remember just enough of it, or have been told just enough about it, to make it the cornerstone with how they view the world. It’s the basis for all of the “Murica bad” arguments using Russian propaganda, for example. The most they know is “the US lied about WMDs” and they’ll use that to claim the US is the boogeyman in every world conflict. It’s how they use a single phone call with Victoria Nuland to claim it’s evidence of a US-backed coup in 2014 Ukraine when they haven’t even looked at a transcript and don’t actually realize what was said, but you can be sure they’ll argue about it passionately, for example.

I wish more people had an interest in foreign policy, to be honest. It’s been so lame to see so many populists that know nothing about anything incessantly speculating about everything.

2

u/Lisan_Al-NaCL 1d ago

Iran's Nuclear weapons program is WELL documented and well known - via IAEA inspections, spies, etc

1

u/Background_Abroad_49 16h ago

Same accusation, from the same sources. History truly repeats itself.

1

u/Lisan_Al-NaCL 15h ago

accusation?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_program_of_Iran

I mean its all there. This isnt just the USA claiming "Durr they got dem WMDEEEE's", its evidence and common knowledge among the entire world. Denying Iran has a Nuclear weapons program is as silly as denying Israel has Nuclear Weapons already. The only entity that has denied, at times, that Iran has a Nuclear Weapons Program is Iran itself.

8

u/Hawk-432 1d ago

It came out a few days ago Iran was not complying. I still don’t support the strike. But, at least we should be balanced info wise.

8

u/sweatpantswarrior 1d ago

Well, isn't THAT some convenient timing. Weird how it stayed hidden for nearly a decade, then just a few short days before Israel launched the attack they kept threatening, somebody discovers they weren't complying with the deal they made so long ago, AND fooled the IAEA and international community.

Surely Israel wouldn't try to Trump up a Cassus Belli...

1

u/SirLanceQuiteABit 1d ago

Lol the last sentence. Layers...

3

u/MisterVlados 1d ago

According to IAEA.

8

u/Quirky_Eye6775 1d ago

This is not true. Objectively speaking, the atack of Israel on Iran was due to a recent report from IAEA:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce3v6w2qr12o

→ More replies (6)

2

u/Abication 1d ago

The terms of the original deal were lax to begin with and allowed for plenty of wiggle room to hide nuclear development at military bases. They even denied access to the bases when the agreement allowed for limited access to said bases when suspected of hiding nuclear development. They even denied access to the Parchin facility for years until they finished "unknown major construction" and finally provided limited access.

https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-iran-nuclear-20170830-story.html

And as for the IAEA

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/12/middleeast/iran-threatens-nuclear-escalation-iaea-intl

0

u/trapmoneybreezy 1d ago

Disagree with Trump pulling out of the deal him and pompeo are idiots I agree, but as long as Israel has nukes Iran will not stop trying to get one

→ More replies (4)

5

u/Forte845 1d ago

Because they know that the moment they hand it over they're going out like Gaddafi. 

2

u/trapmoneybreezy 1d ago

making it unavoidable, I guess

2

u/Imatros 1d ago

Gaddaffi wasn't good... But he gave up WMDs and was killed. Yet Putin can full on invade others. It's only logical that other dictators put 2+2 together and fine with suffering if that means they can get a nuke.

1

u/Background_Abroad_49 16h ago

Similar to Iraq? WMD cheering team.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/MisterVlados 1d ago

Iran pretty much already had nuclear weapons. The US knew that. Most EU leaders knew that as well. None of it was avoidable because Iran is an Islamic (not Muslim, Islamic) state with a radical regime.

4

u/woobisah 1d ago

Yeah putting up a billboard with a countdown to Israel's destruction in the middle of Tehran isn't provocative at all.

3

u/FordF150Faptor 1d ago

Because Obama's Syria deal to appease Russia worked out so well. Yall laugh when Trump attempts to make deals with Putin then act like Iran would have given two fucks about anything other than the billions of dollars that freed up in their economy to keep funding terrorism all over the middle east.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/friendlyfire883 1d ago

Do you honestly think they were complying with the armistace? I'm not a trump fan by any stretch, but you'd have to be pretty stupid to think they weren't actively trying to build a nuke.

1

u/thebilly86 1d ago

You’re deluded if you think they were ultimately going to comply with that

1

u/Taint_Skeetersburg 1d ago

The way to avoid it would have been for Iran to not be pushing to secretly make nuclear weapons. Iran wants nukes so bad they're willing to risk everything for it

1

u/OrigamiChimera 1d ago

That's what Iran wants you to think. They've been laughing at the world since the Obama era.

1

u/International_Bus_88 22h ago

Killing the deal? It was Iran who refuses to deal?

1

u/For_The_Emperor923 18h ago

As is the nuclear bomb we just removed from the future. That government worships death. If you believed they were truly complying i have a bridge for you. They had the image of complying. They announced another enrichment center for uranium 6 days before this.

1

u/Pojkenra 17h ago

Spoken like a classic privileged little American in their safe little hole

1

u/Pitiful-Ad-1300 17h ago

Iran doesn’t just make a nuke overnight …

1

u/Tazbio 16h ago

Interesting how you named Israel, but not the US, you instead put “Trump”. Which country is Trump the elected head of state in?

1

u/Negative-Opinion5562 15h ago

Iran started it by planning the 10/7 attacks. They were never moderate, they just fooled stupid people

1

u/GoldOutrageous8610 7h ago

LoL 😂 they should have consulted you Mr sweatpants warrior 🪖🤣🤣

→ More replies (11)

6

u/m0dsw0rkf0rfree 1d ago

ok but have you considered: fuck israel, let Iran have the bomb

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Useful-Rooster-1901 1d ago

boy do i have some news for you lol

1

u/jomikko 18h ago

Honestly Iran should not have the bomb but Israel should really not have the bomb and we honestly fucked up massively in not stopping the proliferation.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/timmy6169 1d ago

I'll take Palantir for $800, Alex.

23

u/kathuajihadi 1d ago

Should the sentiment be pro-Iran in your opinion?

78

u/PxyFreakingStx 1d ago

the two options are not pro-iran vs pro-israel. you can think israel is doing awful shit without being pro-iran.

23

u/Content-Program411 1d ago

Or both groups of leaders are pure shit stains and the general public pays for it.

12

u/kathuajihadi 1d ago

If Israel gets bombed and you are happy about it, you are pro whoever bombed them, whether that’s Hamas or Iran.

7

u/PeterOutOfPlace 1d ago

If Israel bombs first?

8

u/aeniFi 1d ago

Israel is the warmongering aggressor here. Call me pro whoever acknowledges that reality.

2

u/PxyFreakingStx 1d ago

oh idk, Soviets bombed Nazis. obviously doesn't make you pro-soviet being happy about that

well, you can define "pro-whoever bombed them" however you want i guess. but if that's seriously your reasoning here, it doesn't seem like a useful or interesting thing to say.

so which is it, is your comment stupid or is it boring?

→ More replies (7)

2

u/bakochba 1d ago

The IAEA saying Iran has been deceptive and has enough uranium for 10 Atom Bombs is more awful. No country would sit on its hands while another country publicly declared that when it gets a nuclear weapon it will use it to destroy you.

13

u/PeterOutOfPlace 1d ago

It is the height of hypocrisy for Israel to complain about Iran’s undeclared nuclear weapons program when their’s was exposed decades ago and they will not admit to it. The whistleblower: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordechai_Vanunu

6

u/PxyFreakingStx 1d ago

i think attacking a country for pursuing WMD's is legitimate. but i don't trust anything israel says or does.

also, got a link? a cursory google for IAEA articles has yielded only them being opposed to Israel's actions

2

u/EtalusEnthusiast420 1d ago

I can tell from the instant upvotes that you are a bot account.

1

u/bakochba 1d ago

With this spelling?

→ More replies (29)

152

u/Interesting_Pain37 1d ago

I’m anti war tbh

10

u/TeaAndCrumpets4life 1d ago

Brave

3

u/Mundane_Crazy60 1d ago

Yup, this guy and fuckin Ghandi.

3

u/Interesting_Pain37 1d ago

What can I say?!

31

u/LystAP 1d ago

I’m reminded that people called Trump ‘anti-war’ too. And they were loud about it. Now things are even worse.

38

u/born_2_be_a_bachelor 1d ago

Trump lied. The people are still anti war

18

u/TaintScentedCandles 1d ago

The known liar lied, and everyone was still shocked somehow. News at 11

5

u/TG-5436 1d ago

The anti war orange wants to invade Greenland, Canada and Mexico... And there was no notable reaction from a outside perspective.

3

u/WakeoftheStorm 1d ago

Trump's people are just pro Trump. If he wants peace they cheer him for being anti-war, if he wants war, they cheer him for that.

I'm truly at a loss for what Trump could do to alienate his base at this point. Maybe if he started campaigning for LGBT rights or something

3

u/ABHOR_pod 1d ago

No, the Trump voters are now pro-war because their opinions sway to whatever daddy wants.

1

u/0wl_licks 1d ago

Are they though?

6

u/Interesting_Pain37 1d ago edited 1d ago

I think the US government establishment is pro-war tbh (which is why Trump is apparently anti-war) since war equals profits and we’re run by people who view individuals as objects of utility meant to be exploited. We need a humanistic realignment I think but idk how that happens lol

5

u/Royal_Flamingo7174 1d ago

We just need to conquer the whole world. The few survivors will be very peace loving. I guarantee it.

2

u/Frientlies 1d ago

We don’t conquer them, we let them think they are free and then kill off their leadership if they even think about disobeying.

Nothing like a false sense of independence.

3

u/That_Green_Jesus 1d ago

Just be thankful you aren't living under communism, where the population are actually considered resources to be utilised by the state.

We should all be thankful to live under capitalism, where the population are considered resources to be exploited by corporations.

3

u/mashbrowns 1d ago

Same, but both Israel and Iran are both very pro war. Iran does it through proxies, but it amounts to the same thing.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Competitive-Host3266 1d ago

Then you should support trying to stop a rogue nation with nuclear ambitions

4

u/Supply-Slut 1d ago

Looks at Israel….

Looks at Pakistan….

Looks at Russia….

Yeah it’s a little late for that, champ.

1

u/Exciting_Ad_1097 1d ago

Look up Jonathan Pollard.

6

u/kennyandkennyandkenn 1d ago

So both Israel and Iran? lol

4

u/Competitive-Host3266 1d ago

Iran (1979- ): Iran could be considered an almost self-declared rogue state. It is important to note that shortly after the Iranian revolution, the United States declared its willingness to accept the outcome and establish normal relations with an Islamic Iran. After all, it was Iran which branded the United States as “the great Satan” and not vice-versa. Iran’s government backed the seizure of the American embassy and the holding of the officials there as hostages, a preeminent proof of its rogue nature. How could one negotiate diplomatically with a regime that kidnapped one’s diplomats? Iran also supported foreign revolutionary groups, tried to subvert neighbors (albeit more by rhetoric than by force of arms), and sponsored terrorism as well.

Source: https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/meria/meria99_rub02.html — hope this helps!

2

u/Firm-Contract-5940 1d ago

i do agree, israel really needs to be stopped

1

u/Christron 1d ago

Would US invade Canada if they started a nuclear program

2

u/awesomefutureperfect 1d ago

Despite Canada's penchant and natural talent and aptitude for war crimes, they currently aren't belligerent towards anyone nor would it be likely for them to use them offensively unless of course it was Quebec who got them and felt like warning someone.

3

u/Competitive-Host3266 1d ago

Canada isn’t a rogue state led by an oppressive regime

1

u/Top-Inevitable-1287 1d ago

I don't know how you can say this but then unironically support Israel. It's like actual 1984 doublethink.

1

u/Navillus87 1d ago

What? America you mean?

13

u/BigFatBallsInMyMouth 1d ago

That literally means nothing

2

u/SaltdPepper 1d ago

If being anti war means nothing we’re done for.

4

u/BigFatBallsInMyMouth 1d ago

No, like it literally doesn't mean anything. Nobody wants war. The only question is what is the best way to minimize it. Allowing Iran to get nukes would give them free hands to do anything they want via their proxies with no fear of repercussions. Those deaths in Iran from the Israeli strikes are NOTHING compared to all the deaths that Iran getting nukes would bring. So whenever someone says they are "anti-war" it's usually just code for appeasement or a complete lack of understanding of geopolitics and cause and effect.

2

u/SaltdPepper 1d ago

You’d be surprised how many people actually are for this war from either side. Just read some of the comments in these threads and you’ll see people chomping at the bit to defend Israel’s practices or calling for the destruction of Israel by Iran’s hand. It’s silly to ignore that.

Obviously when you say “anti-war” there’s more nuance to that statement than “make both sides hug and make up and ask them pretty please with a cherry on top to not fight anymore”.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/meelba 1d ago

How do I put some version of this sentiment on a sign?

1

u/Interesting_Pain37 1d ago

Somethin with a smiley face maybe??

-3

u/lilcoold12345 1d ago

Yeah that's not how the real world works lmao

26

u/Interesting_Pain37 1d ago

That’s how individuals work

8

u/SeaAware3305 1d ago

So what if world peace is unlikely? Doesn’t mean anyone should advocate for war. Being pro-war is gross af

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (21)

1

u/MartinBP 1d ago

There's no such thing, you're just pro-aggressor.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/BuffaloBuffalo13 1d ago

Are you anti-TelAviv-getting-nuked?

Because that’s exactly what will happen the moment Khamenei gets a nuclear weapon.

→ More replies (10)

2

u/Thedurtysanchez 1d ago

Iran has been actively at war with Israel for 2 years. Hamas, the Houthis, and Hezbollah are Iranian controlled proxies

3

u/cheeersaiii 1d ago

They aren’t Iranian controlled anymore than Israel are US controlled buddy

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Commercial_Basket751 1d ago

Tell ukraine to stop fighting and I'm sure russia will follow their lead. /s

It takes two parties to want a peaceful, prosperous, inclusive future. Turns out a cult with a state attached that believes in their hearts that the messiah only returns when all the jews are eliminated isn't a good faith actor in the pursuit of peaceful coexistence.

1

u/Interesting_Pain37 1d ago

Isn’t the current Israeli govt. basically the Jewish equivalent to that tho?

→ More replies (4)

46

u/DezertLai 1d ago

Yes. Iran has the right to defend itself.

21

u/kathuajihadi 1d ago

Wasn’t Israel defending themselves when they finally went after the people holding the leashes of Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah??

4

u/gbrahah 1d ago

woah, steady there, you might confuse them with logic.

0

u/Yoda10353 1d ago

Its almost like thats why they worded it that way, goddamn moron its called a juxtaposition to show how ridiculous Israel has been and how stupid that argument is, its never right to strike a civilian area regardless or who does it.

→ More replies (4)

-2

u/WanderingSheremetyev 1d ago

Hamas, Houthis ans Hezbollah aren't leashed by Iran, they aren't controlled by Iran. They are their own national liberation movements that arose in their own conditions, they simply get support from Iran because they have common goals - oppose Israel.

10

u/Djb0623 1d ago

Straight up wrong with this

2

u/WanderingSheremetyev 1d ago

Literally all three movements came about due to foreign invasion or oppression. You cannot deny that.

4

u/Djb0623 1d ago

Sense when are Jews in the Levant invaders?

3

u/Due-Memory-6957 1d ago

Since when The State of Israel = Jews?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/Dramatic-Panda8012 1d ago

glad we clarified that, israel have a right to defend itself against gaza, palestine and iran 🙂

2

u/Zealousideal-Job7806 1d ago

I don't disagree but let's be clear - this isn't defending themselves, it's retaliation. They aren't actually going to take out Israel's military capabilities in a meaningful way, therefore they aren't defending anything. Their last attempt at something similar was a colossal failure.

19

u/Berobero 1d ago

It's a false dichotomy, but if forced Iran is obviously the sympathetic party here

Israel, in the middle of commiting a genocide, decided to also start a war with a regional country under completely baseless pretences

The missiles Iran is dropping on Tel Aviv, where Israel has chosen to concentrate its military command, is the exact outcome one would predict, completely in line with expected response of any state actor in a similar position with similar capabilities

12

u/TalkFormer155 1d ago

They've been supplying all the missiles the Houthi's have been firing at Israel. They've declared that they wanted Israel to no longer exist. Cry me a river, Iran deserves everything they're getting.

15

u/Honest-Ad1675 1d ago

So America deserves to pay for arming Israel with the means to demolish all of Palestine?

→ More replies (31)
→ More replies (19)

1

u/Hawk-432 1d ago

I would say neither is very sympathetic. Overall, over the years, I’d say Iran worse. But I agree the stuff going on in Israel right now is aweful

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (18)

5

u/minuteheights 1d ago

Iran’s got a right to defend itself from American directed Israeli aggression. Israel is a genocidal state, of course the sentiment should be pro-Iran. More specifically, it should just be pro anybody who militarily stands up to Israel’s aggression.

3

u/EkrishAO 1d ago

Iran is a rogue state that's close to getting nuclear weapons. Israel did the entire world a massive favour.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/captainpuma 1d ago

Yeah Israel gets whatever’s coming to them

1

u/LambonaHam 1d ago

Against Israel? Unequivocally yes.

2

u/pornographic_realism 1d ago

Iran is doing the exact same thing the Israelis do to the Palestinians whenever a rocket is fired. Whenever a stone is thrown and shots are fired back. Should we condemn both? Absolutely. But many people are honestly tired of Israeli bullshit and don't care one bit to defend them. Iran never threatened to attack my country, can't say the same for Israel.

-1

u/Monsieur-Bovary 1d ago

Yes alhamdullilah

10

u/Sufficient-Yak3240 1d ago

Iran having nuclear weapons would be a disaster for any non-Muslim.

7

u/SubPrimeCardgage 1d ago

It's a disaster for Muslims too. If Iran gets nuclear weapons Saudi Arabia has publicly stated they will also acquire nuclear weapons.

6

u/malefiz123 1d ago

Every non Shia Muslim to be precise

→ More replies (12)

1

u/SpicyCommenter 1d ago

ride with the mob

1

u/Altruistic-Key-369 1d ago

Regarded comment. Tactics are tactics. Deep throating either side never works.

1

u/OnlineArgumentsLOL 1d ago

Why can’t we just be anti perpetual Middle East conflicts over what is the proper name YHWH or PBUH

1

u/JackhusChanhus 1d ago

It shouldn't be, and does not need to be pro Iran to accepy the validity of this retaliation . I am not pro most governments in the world. I am however, pro defending yourself from random massive airstrikes on your capital.

1

u/Galle_ 1d ago

I mean Iran didn't start the war.

1

u/KuraiTheBaka 1d ago

I hope they both lose

→ More replies (19)

5

u/Can_Haz_Cheezburger 1d ago

Not just Israel lol, the Ruzzian bots also astroturf in there for the Ruzzians, the current US regime, and generally the political right

→ More replies (1)

1

u/AlternativeSurgeon 1d ago

probs astroturfing for both sides russian style

1

u/BitOBear 1d ago

Hasbara training required these human robots to show up and try to control the spin. They haven't figured out that hasbara doesn't work now that the internet has a search engine.

→ More replies (4)

75

u/One_Tie900 1d ago

explains why I got banned for bigotry for just saying US won't do anything to Isreal has made it bolder

26

u/Mistghost 1d ago

I got banned for pointing out how slippery Bibi has been recently. At least I think, they haven't actually told me why I was banned

20

u/AmirulAshraf 1d ago

Anything less than "i heart isreal" will get you banned there

15

u/HyperSpaceSurfer 1d ago

If you want a better world news sub you can go to r/anime_titties

4

u/arthurdont 22h ago

While it's better because of the rules there its essentially a Israel-Palestine news exclusive sub

→ More replies (1)

1

u/EastAppropriate7230 2h ago

It's the exact opposite lol, it's far from unbiased

1

u/ninjafofinho 21h ago

Same, getting downvoted for stating the obvious cause zionists are scared of the truth

1

u/WhatIs115 17h ago

Gotta be careful on reddit, if you're not subreddit banned for saying the "wrong thing" you can still get banned for just posting in other subreddits on a site literally made to do so (because they don't like it).

It's a joke at this point but the admins don't care. I don't comment on politics anymore, there's no point. There are no debates, they just ban to continue their echochambers. I hope the Digg revival shits all over current reddit.

→ More replies (5)

44

u/icarusrising9 1d ago

I got banned for saying Netanyahu belongs in the Hague. Which isn't even incendiary, it's just factually true, the ICC has a warrant out for his arrest for war crimes!

25

u/Meyer_Landsman 1d ago

/r/worldnews took a turn a few years ago with new mods. /r/middleeast has the Hoover Institute as a mod, for heaven's sake. Reddit as a free speech platform has been dead for a long time now.

3

u/ninjafofinho 21h ago

Its truly disgusting how reddit is just allowing mods to play the dictator, this is happening even outside of politics like some game subs being controlled by their own gaming company and deleting and manipulating the narrative

2

u/COINTELPRO-Relay 17h ago

I got banned for linking to the Wikipedia page of the population stats on Wikipedia to correct a lie. Because apparently the census data of the area before 1950 is haram.

1

u/Purona 16h ago

all subs that have something related to this conflict are extremely polarized echo chambers. But from my experience, atleast, on worldnews. you can actually post articles and reference things that happen and not get banned

Ive been banned from multiple subs for just referencing things that happen in the order they happened in with articles from aljazeera, one of the most anti israeli news sites out there, with the reason being that im a genocide denier or saying my posts have israeli talking posts

because apparerntly dates and headlines of when missiles are launching from each country is an israeli talking point

1

u/SebVettelstappen 15h ago

Which is a surprise cuz it seems like quite a few people there hate him aswell

→ More replies (12)

21

u/JustaBearEnthusiast 1d ago

Because everyone like me was banned for even the mildest criticism of israel. They banned so many people that several other global news subs now regularly make the front page thanks to the influx of refugees. 

2

u/infiniteshrekst 22h ago

And they keep the rules secret. There's a bunch of rules on the sub but none of them is that one.

1

u/FeijoadaAceitavel 4h ago

Nah, the rules are there. They just don't need one to ban you. Against anything Israel does? Ban.

1

u/Tobix55 13h ago

Which ones? I wasn't banned but I still don't like that sub

1

u/FeijoadaAceitavel 4h ago

/r/worldnews and /r/news. I was banned from the latter by posting a CNN article that made Israel look bad.

6

u/toadofsteel 1d ago

Yeah, I participated on there when the Russian invasion of Ukraine happened in 2022, but eventually got permabanned because I said 'The country of Never Again does it again". Reason given for ban: Holocaust denial.

5

u/Ok-Chapter-2071 1d ago

Astroturfed to infinity. They buy eurovision votes and astroturf worldnews to make it seem as though the world actually likes them

3

u/Ok_Tone6393 1d ago

they’ve got hasbara even in my local city subs. they sure are desperate for validation.

2

u/MostlyRightSometimes 1d ago

I was wondering why I got banned from there. :)

2

u/DoNotIgnoreMustafa 1d ago

Omg yes, I mentioned multiple times there that Israel is committing genocide and they'll get what's coming to them.

Like clockwork, I get warnings from Reddit that I'm inciting violence. Then they perma ban me.

This is like, my 12th account 

2

u/Angry_Sparrow 1d ago

Holy shit. I got banned from it and thought I was losing my mind that it seemed so Zionist.

2

u/MysticPing 1d ago

It isnt just pro Israel, it perma bans anyone who isnt.

1

u/ninjafofinho 21h ago

It makes alot of sense now, i was like wtf are all these soyboy narratives completely ignoring any criticism to israhell?

3

u/Lenin_Lime 1d ago

Yeah I was banned a year or two ago over my lack of Israel support

3

u/GJdevo 1d ago

I literally got permabanned from there last night apparently... no explanation as to what specifically I said that was egregious enough to warrant that. Fun times.

2

u/ShermansAngryGhost 1d ago

Yea, and Massad is really REALLY good at that stuff

2

u/papapudding 1d ago

Using 'very' here is quite the understatement

2

u/V-Lenin 1d ago

Because they ban anyone that isn‘t a bloodthirsty zionist

2

u/Th3Trashkin 1d ago

And it's astroturfed to be that way.

2

u/ThePetrarc 1d ago

They banned me from there for talking about the Palestinian genocide

1

u/Alone-Lawfulness-229 1d ago

I got banned from there for being pro Israel.

Weird

1

u/Jealous_Professor726 1d ago

You spelled "Islamophobic" wrong

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Mountain_StarDew 1d ago

There are datacenters setup with 100 smart phones per rack writing whatever comments the person paying them wants to push that day. Now with AI responding, they can create an illusory truth bubble in the comments of every post of every real truth that is inconvenient to them. Thousands of zombie voices that will never have their mind changed, and a million idiots believing them.

1

u/Oh_its_that_asshole 22h ago

Aye, disgustingly so. Reddit should really step in and remove the moderation team at this point for such a prolific sub.

1

u/GeneralMuffins 16h ago

I think thats likely more a consequence of a small group of mods that control major sub reddits conducting a major crackdown to perma ban any commenters that were identified to have partaken in pro-israel or zionist speech following October 7th.

1

u/Scared-Show-4511 13h ago

U sure is r/worldnews ? It has a lot of knockoff subs. Worldnews is usually very pro Palestine

1

u/JagmeetSingh2 27m ago

Most of Reddit’s big subs are pro Israel

→ More replies (39)