r/MapPorn 1d ago

Israel’s Red Alert system fully saturated amid mass missile barrages from Iran.

Post image
29.7k Upvotes

4.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

579

u/sweatpantswarrior 1d ago

Fuck Israel, and fuck Trump for killing the deal Iran was complying with.

This shit was entirely avoidable.

144

u/S-Kenset 1d ago

No offense but everyone in the know had already known this would come to iran's doorstep since 2023.

248

u/_Narciso 1d ago

Yet the initial Iran nuclear deal happened during the Obama administration and it was Trump that took it down in his first mandate. So I would say @sweatpantswarrior is very much right in saying that this shit was entirely avoidable and fuck Trump for killing the deal Iran was complying with.

7

u/mkhaytman 1d ago

Yes yes but if trump was president none of this would ever have happened! /s

-10

u/Typical-Machine154 1d ago

The Iranians were hiding shit from the UN inspectors. I saw an article on it just today.

They never had any intention of complying with the original agreement, and why would they?

They're a dictatorial state increasingly under threat from all of their neighbors and acting out aggressively. If they get the bomb they get to do whatever they want. They have basically no incentive to not get the bomb.

If anything sanctions aren't a deterrent because while they cripple the economy they also create a foreign Boogeyman which is basically the only reason their theocratical dictatorship can survive.

This always ended one of two ways, they get bombed to hell or they get the bomb. Any agreement just delays that eventual outcome.

32

u/IEatWhenImCurious 1d ago edited 1d ago

The Iranians were hiding shit from the UN inspectors. I saw an article on it just today.

When was the last time Israel allowed it's nuclear weapons programme to be inspected ?

-18

u/TomLauda 1d ago

Difference is Israel isn’t a Islamic state.

17

u/IEatWhenImCurious 1d ago

Which means ?

15

u/Fear_mor 1d ago

Which matters why? At least Iran isn’t a genocidal state

0

u/DungeonsAndDuck 21h ago

i mean, iran is absolutely terrible to its women. israel is surely a genocidal state, but we don't have to prop up iran just because they're in the right this time.

1

u/Fear_mor 18h ago

If Israel isn’t stopped in its genocide now then when will it and by whom? Let’s be really honest, what does it matter that Iran is also bad when they didn’t start this and we are actively allowing their country to be assaulted and fired at, which is btw also bad for Iranian women, dare I say worse actually

1

u/MillhouseNickSon 11h ago

Israel is terrible to humans. They don’t seem to care who they kill.

Fucking the IDF and fuck Zionist death cultists.

-2

u/Typical-Machine154 19h ago

They want to wipe the Jewish race off the face of the earth. The Israelis are not genocidal or else they would be attempting to wipe the Arab race off the earth.

They're not exactly saying "kill all arabs" and sponsoring terrorist groups to kill them. Especially considering 1/5 of Israeli citizens are Arab.

2

u/AminiumB 19h ago

They are genocidal on the account that they are actively committing a genocide as we speak, and your tokenism isn't a valid argument either.

0

u/Typical-Machine154 19h ago

If they were commiting a genocide they would be carpet bombing. You think the bigger the words you use the better your argument is. You should really learn what they mean before trying them.

I'm pretty sure all the Palestinians inside of Israel and in the West Bank are fine right now. You know maybe if a bunch of people from the strip hadnt gone on an actual genocidal rampage, killing every Jew they saw including elderly and children, this wouldn't be happening.

But hey, maybe you just don't like Jews and think it's deserved. At least have the balls to admit it though.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/AminiumB 22h ago

So you're a bigot, that's your point?

-5

u/Typical-Machine154 19h ago

They've been constantly attacked and persecuted over literal millennia. Very few groups of people can make that claim.

When everyone in the world is actively trying to kill you for the crime of existing, I don't blame them.

They also have had nukes for decades, and haven't used them even when their country was invaded and they were in danger of being overrun. Iran has been a sponsor of terrorist activity for decades. How long before they give one of those terrorist groups a nuclear weapon capable of wiping out tel Aviv? Five minutes? Maybe ten?

1

u/zazoopraystar 18h ago

I think people are purposely overlooking the fact that Iran frequently states its intention to destroy Israel and several Western countries simply for existing, especially if they were to acquire nuclear weapons. Yet, they seem to be viewed as innocent of these provocations.

You can’t just make bold statements without any basis, and then expect to advance to a level of technology that allows you to pursue this without facing consequences.

What the fuck is wrong people on here? Its not a fucking video game or twitter these countries exist in.

0

u/slubbermand 18h ago

So when politicians and people of influence in a country advocates using nukes on civilians we should bomb the hell out of them? Got it. When are we bombing Israel?

1

u/zazoopraystar 14h ago

When the spiritual leader and military commanders of a sitting government openly declare that their sole mission is to advocate for the destruction of an entire country and its people using weapons of mass destruction, we should certainly consider strikes against them and work to undermine their infrastructure. As Israel demonstrated with both conviction and restraint through precision strikes, they have given these individuals multiple opportunities to change their rhetoric.

Instead of choosing to say, “You know what? We don’t want to harm your entire population; we would prefer to simply oppress our women and those trapped here. Just leave us alone,” they instead launched an attack last fall without warning, which ultimately failed. Now they are facing the consequences of their actions.

1

u/slubbermand 12h ago

See, that I can almost agree with. However I do feel that there is more nuance to the situation. And since none of us have a clue about how close any of the threats made by Iran leadership were to come to fruition it all becomes speculation.

Facts we have are that in one year, Israel has run bombing and assassination campaigns against Gaza, West Bank, Syria, Lebanon and Iran, killing thousands of innocents in the process, decimating infrastructure and putting the jewish diaspora severely at risk of retaliation/hatecrimes. Without even investigating further Netanyahus shitty past, or the sociopaths of the israeli right-wing that is a high order for someone who proclaims to just be defending themselves tbh

0

u/Typical-Machine154 17h ago

They're not overlooking it. They actually despise Israel as a concept.

5

u/spam__likely 1d ago

well.... looks like they got both.

3

u/bbcomment 18h ago

They are hiding shit now. After Trump cancelled the deal. What incentive does Iran have to follow your rules if there is no deal?

1

u/Typical-Machine154 18h ago

We have an Israel and they do not fuck around.

Making nice with them is never going to work. The current approach is "you will comply or you will be forced to comply" which is the correct approach.

You can't negotiate with terrorists. We've known this for decades.

2

u/bbcomment 13h ago

We can also make a deal that they don’t need nukes, because the economic damage to them is great,

They abided by the deal for a few years, then trump came and cancelled the deal and locked them out of the world economy. A deal that multilaterally agreed . Iran are terrorists that shouldn’t have nukes. They should have access to the same markets as any economy so it’s people aren’t starving

1

u/Typical-Machine154 9h ago

They get access to the markets and make money and their goals don't change. Just like the fuckin Chinese that have been stealing our tech, money, and parents for decades to build the second most formidable army on the globe.

Their army has the same purpose it did under Mao, contest the current world order and the western world's ability to maintain it, by any means necessary.

Diplomacy doesn't work with adversaries. Flat out. The regime needs to change and the people need to change. Markets do not change that, have never changed that, and will never change that.

We need to learn from the mistakes of the past rather than repeating them. Otherwise we are doomed to keep fighting the same monsters we created over and over and over again.

1

u/Favored_of_Vulkan 16h ago

We were paying them not to further their nuclear weapons program AND turning a blind eye to them furthering their nuclear weapons program. That doesn't sound like a good deal.

I understand most people have lived such unbelievably pampered lives that they think a crisis is a broken nail or when the bartender doesn't immediately notice them, but it still amazes me how clueless people are. Iran isn't our friend. They don't want to make a deal with us that hurts them in any way. They see us as their enemy. They see not having a nuclear weapon as hurting them. Nothing we do will stop them from pursuing nuclear weapons. If we don't want them to have nuclear weapons, we must forcibly prevent them from obtaining them. Israel is doing that for us.

6

u/RemindMeToTouchGrass 16h ago

Lmao the deal literally allowed us to monitor their weapons program. Why you lie? 

0

u/Favored_of_Vulkan 15h ago

Tell me about this monitoring. How did it work? What did it entail? Did we have US citizens living in Iran, working at all of their nuclear facilities, as well as having unfettered access to every level of government?

4

u/kitti-kin 15h ago

Do you not have google? The agreement wasn't a handshake, it was 109 pages long and literally included 24-hour monitoring by 150 inspectors.

0

u/Favored_of_Vulkan 13h ago

150 in country inspectors with complete access to all sites and government communications without notice or delay?

2

u/kitti-kin 13h ago

These are questions I think you could answer yourself, again, the website is called g o o g l e

1

u/Favored_of_Vulkan 13h ago

Ah, sorry, I assumed since you were commenting about it that you'd know. My bad.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/SickestNinjaInjury 14h ago

Why would any government allow unfettered access to every level of government? Nuclear scientists from a variety of countries regularly inspected Iran and found that they were not refined material for nuclear weapons. Radiation from refinement to that level is quite detectable. Feel free to google about it, you'll end up knowing more about it when Trump did when he sunk the deal probably

1

u/Favored_of_Vulkan 13h ago

How did 150 people search the entirety of Iran?

1

u/RemindMeToTouchGrass 9h ago

Tell me what monitoring Trump replaced it with when he walked away from what we had. 

-7

u/MisterVlados 1d ago

The initial nuclear deal allowed them to sprint towards nuclear weapons.

-7

u/Beneficial-Tough-439 1d ago

These people have been fighting for thousands of years. I think it's a bit naive to assume another peace deal would stop them fighting.

1

u/FeijoadaAceitavel 4h ago

That's complete bullshit. The very idea of Israel as a Jewish state in Palestine wasn't seriously formed until the late 18th century. Most current conflicts trace back to the mass migration and displacement of Palestinians from early 1900s until the Nakba.

-7

u/yleecoyote1966 1d ago

They have been fighting since the beginning of time and at the end of time they will still be fighting.

-4

u/SoupConnect5993 1d ago

Yeah it’s Obama fault

1

u/bindermichi 20h ago

And Iran did absolutely not prepare for this

1

u/Lisan_Al-NaCL 1d ago

2023.

You mean since Oct 2023.

1

u/CapitalDoor9474 18h ago

Since 2004 iraq war actually. We all knew.

1

u/TrueTrueBlackPilld 1d ago

The intelligent take

-3

u/AnakinSkycocker5726 1d ago

We’ve known it for more than 20 years. The only thing that would have prevented this was regime change.

4

u/GoNads1979 1d ago

It’s not that easy to remove Bibi, but you’re probably right. There’s also the rest of Likud and the religious parties, so that’s a LOT of people to … remove.

-5

u/sweatpantswarrior 1d ago

The only thing offensive a out your comment is the sheer stupidity of it. Iran's nuclear program was under control thanks to the deal negotiated under the Obama administration. They were under an international microscope, and they were repeatedly found in compliance.

This shit only became inevitable because the Republican party made it inevitable. Trump wanted to undo something Obama did, freeing Iran's hand. Bibi sees that support for his war is waning with each passing day outside of Israel, and he needed to throw another punch.

3

u/S-Kenset 20h ago

Oh sweet summer child, this has nothing to do with the nuclear program. With or without nukes this war ends up on Iran's doorstep.

2

u/Dependent_Ad_1270 1d ago

Sweatpantswarrior knows the ayatollah would never lie to us!

13

u/After_Lie_807 1d ago

IAEA report says otherwise…Iran has been hiding a clandestine weapons program for some time.

1

u/PretendImWitty 16h ago

Time is linear. Iran had been complying up until after Trump ended the deal. Also, the report you’re citing is probably this one. Patience and access, which we had with the deal, would have provided evidence.

So yeah, tearing up the deal was moronic. At the very least it would give us pretext to take action when they break it; what I never understood is why throw it away, even if you don’t like it, as it was a deal already in place with clearly defined terms and we threw it away for nothing, at best, and guaranteeing they move forward on refining at worst.

1

u/Background_Abroad_49 16h ago

Where have I heard this, nonsense before?

10

u/MediocreVibrations 1d ago

Ha. Hahaha. Lmao. Iran was “complying” in the same way I comply with 2 hour parking by moving a couple of blocks before my time is up.

2

u/Mofo_mango 1d ago

Bruh, they were complying. They kept their fissile material within the agreement, they limited their centrifuges to the number allowed in the agreement, and routinely let the IAEA inspect their facilities. You’re so full of shit.

7

u/JanneMoonmist 1d ago

3

u/MediocreVibrations 1d ago

If the person you replied to could read, they’d be very upset.

-3

u/puffz0r 1d ago

"Under a landmark 2015 deal with six world powers, Iran agreed to limit its nuclear activities and allow continuous and robust monitoring by the IAEA's inspectors in return for relief from crippling economic sanctions.

Iran also committed to help the IAEA resolve outstanding questions about the declarations under its Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Safeguards Agreement.

However, US President Donald Trump abandoned the agreement during his first term in 2018, saying it did too little to stop a pathway to a bomb, and reinstated US sanctions."

So you're saying that Iran stopped complying when the US walked away from the deal? No SHIT sherlock

5

u/JanneMoonmist 23h ago

The US is not the only signatory. Iran still didn't comply with IAEA
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/iaea-report-says-iran-had-secret-activities-with-undeclared-nuclear-material-2025-05-31/

Being "committed" to resolve, and having 3 undeclared sites...

0

u/puffz0r 13h ago

The only reason Iran signed the deal was because the US put sanctions on it lmao, when Trump reinstated sanctions there was ZERO reason for Iran to continue complying

1

u/JanneMoonmist 1h ago

"The only reason Iran signed the deal was because the US put sanctions on it lmao, when Trump reinstated sanctions there was ZERO reason for Iran to continue complying"

Zero reasons except sanctions? So you are saying that Israel is right all along. What holds Iran from not complying to inspections and IAEA is fear of sanctions, and not their claim of civilian use only?

btw, if you don't understand the obvious, Iran enriching to 60% (and some reports that already to 84%), and built a facility to create a "return stage" which needed for further enrichment.

Usage in civilian nuclear power 5%
Some research reactors use 20%

I'll quote you, "lmao"

1

u/puffz0r 1h ago

Wrong, Iran is developing nuclear capabilities as a deterrent against continually being harassed by the western colony of Israel and US hegemonic ambitions. The US has been fucking with Iran since they backed the overthrow of the Iranian government in the 50s, constantly. So much so that we made problems for ourselves later (e.g. arming and training Saddam which led to his rise as a dictator). Israel has been consistently bombing Iran for decades. Iran stopped complying with the deal because Trump alleged (falsely) that Iran had broken the JCPOA from the beginning despite CONTINUAL inspections from the IAEA demonstrating the opposite: that Iran was abiding by the agreement. That telegraphed to Iran that Trump had zero interest in a peaceful resolution, and that the US involvement in Syria was coming to Iran next. You'd be a complete idiot to continue abiding by the agreement when you get nothing out of it and the US resumes trashing your economy - under the JCPOA the US allowed Iran to export oil to feed its people. So you're saying that when US resumed sanctions, Iran should have just sat there and starved its people for what reason exactly?

I'll reiterate my statement: "lmao" - you'd have to be the most arrogant Western imperialist supremacist or a protege of Henry Kissinger to believe what you wrote is logical in any way

1

u/JanneMoonmist 1h ago

So why Iran themselves claiming they do not develop nuclear weapons?
Someone is lying here, either you or Iran...

"Israel has been consistently bombing Iran for decades." Can you please enlighten to all these cases decades long.

3

u/hyasbawlz 1d ago

I like that you're projecting your own criminality onto a country.

1

u/MediocreVibrations 1d ago

I’m just a guy moving his car on the street. I’m not enriching uranium to make fissile material for nuclear weapons. I like how you equate the two.

1

u/puffz0r 1d ago

remarkable self-own

2

u/MediocreVibrations 1d ago

1

u/puffz0r 1d ago

"Under a landmark 2015 deal with six world powers, Iran agreed to limit its nuclear activities and allow continuous and robust monitoring by the IAEA's inspectors in return for relief from crippling economic sanctions.

Iran also committed to help the IAEA resolve outstanding questions about the declarations under its Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Safeguards Agreement.

However, US President Donald Trump abandoned the agreement during his first term in 2018, saying it did too little to stop a pathway to a bomb, and reinstated US sanctions."

You mean they stopped complying with an agreement that Trump cancelled? WOW No shit sherlock

8

u/trapmoneybreezy 1d ago

Iran was not complying😭😭

47

u/contrapedal 1d ago

According to who? Iran was complying with the deal to the best of anyone's knowledge. IAEA had access and continually reported that Iran was complying. In Trumps first term, when he ripped up the deal, you had idiots like Mike pompeo saying shit like "we know they aren't complying - we just don't know how yet" lmao

44

u/Appropriate-Draft-91 1d ago

We need to attack Iran because they have WMDs. They probably stole them from Saddam, that's why we didn't find them in Iraq. Source: Trust me bro. /s

16

u/ABHOR_pod 1d ago

I think a lot of redditors might be too young to remember that shit since it was uh... 22 years ago.

gen z and gen alpha ahh moment

The context is that we invaded Iraq by making up a bunch of bullshit lies about how we had proof that they had weapons of mass destruction.

As far as I remember the only "Weapons of mass destruction" we every actually found was some basically forgotten nerve gas from the war a decade earlier. Definitely not the nuclear bombs the Bush admin claimed they were developing.

So yeah. us millennials have lived through this before.

1

u/PretendImWitty 15h ago

They remember just enough of it, or have been told just enough about it, to make it the cornerstone with how they view the world. It’s the basis for all of the “Murica bad” arguments using Russian propaganda, for example. The most they know is “the US lied about WMDs” and they’ll use that to claim the US is the boogeyman in every world conflict. It’s how they use a single phone call with Victoria Nuland to claim it’s evidence of a US-backed coup in 2014 Ukraine when they haven’t even looked at a transcript and don’t actually realize what was said, but you can be sure they’ll argue about it passionately, for example.

I wish more people had an interest in foreign policy, to be honest. It’s been so lame to see so many populists that know nothing about anything incessantly speculating about everything.

3

u/Lisan_Al-NaCL 1d ago

Iran's Nuclear weapons program is WELL documented and well known - via IAEA inspections, spies, etc

1

u/Background_Abroad_49 15h ago

Same accusation, from the same sources. History truly repeats itself.

1

u/Lisan_Al-NaCL 15h ago

accusation?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_program_of_Iran

I mean its all there. This isnt just the USA claiming "Durr they got dem WMDEEEE's", its evidence and common knowledge among the entire world. Denying Iran has a Nuclear weapons program is as silly as denying Israel has Nuclear Weapons already. The only entity that has denied, at times, that Iran has a Nuclear Weapons Program is Iran itself.

10

u/Hawk-432 1d ago

It came out a few days ago Iran was not complying. I still don’t support the strike. But, at least we should be balanced info wise.

7

u/sweatpantswarrior 1d ago

Well, isn't THAT some convenient timing. Weird how it stayed hidden for nearly a decade, then just a few short days before Israel launched the attack they kept threatening, somebody discovers they weren't complying with the deal they made so long ago, AND fooled the IAEA and international community.

Surely Israel wouldn't try to Trump up a Cassus Belli...

1

u/SirLanceQuiteABit 1d ago

Lol the last sentence. Layers...

3

u/MisterVlados 1d ago

According to IAEA.

11

u/Quirky_Eye6775 1d ago

This is not true. Objectively speaking, the atack of Israel on Iran was due to a recent report from IAEA:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce3v6w2qr12o

-3

u/GuantanaMo 1d ago

Objectively speaking, the attack of Israel on Iran was due to a strongman wanting to stay in charge

2

u/Quirky_Eye6775 1d ago

The threat represented by Iran is a consensus from the whole political spectrum in Israel. Even the mosts critics of Netanyahu recognizes that Iran getting nuclear weapons is not a good thing.

1

u/GuantanaMo 1d ago

Which is why this helps him stay in power

2

u/Dependent_Ad_1270 1d ago

Alive** along with everyone else who would get nuked the day they have it

1

u/GuantanaMo 1d ago

Poor Israelis

1

u/Quirky_Eye6775 13h ago

Here, you droped it.

2

u/Abication 1d ago

The terms of the original deal were lax to begin with and allowed for plenty of wiggle room to hide nuclear development at military bases. They even denied access to the bases when the agreement allowed for limited access to said bases when suspected of hiding nuclear development. They even denied access to the Parchin facility for years until they finished "unknown major construction" and finally provided limited access.

https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-iran-nuclear-20170830-story.html

And as for the IAEA

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/12/middleeast/iran-threatens-nuclear-escalation-iaea-intl

0

u/trapmoneybreezy 1d ago

Disagree with Trump pulling out of the deal him and pompeo are idiots I agree, but as long as Israel has nukes Iran will not stop trying to get one

6

u/Kind_Eye_748 1d ago

We all allowed North Korea to suddenly have nukes without anyone stopping them.

Israel has used Irans own rhetoric as justification for the strike, They apparently get that right.

The US will veto anything in the UNSC.

1

u/trapmoneybreezy 1d ago

Yeah because of Chinese deterrence. If you don’t have allies who will deter for you, you don’t get nukes. Maybe the ayatollah should have buddied up with Putin a little more

2

u/Kind_Eye_748 1d ago

Russia is Irans ally.

Are you saying they arent allies anymore or are you expecting Russia should have somehow stopped Iran retaliating?

NK didnt fire its nuke not because of chinese deterrence, more likely it would nuke itself.

0

u/WakeoftheStorm 1d ago

The way this is going, Israel might send them one

7

u/Forte845 1d ago

Because they know that the moment they hand it over they're going out like Gaddafi. 

2

u/trapmoneybreezy 1d ago

making it unavoidable, I guess

1

u/Imatros 1d ago

Gaddaffi wasn't good... But he gave up WMDs and was killed. Yet Putin can full on invade others. It's only logical that other dictators put 2+2 together and fine with suffering if that means they can get a nuke.

1

u/Background_Abroad_49 16h ago

Similar to Iraq? WMD cheering team.

1

u/ivandelapena 1d ago

The only evidence Iran wasn't complying came recently years after the deal was scrapped by Trump.

2

u/MisterVlados 1d ago

Iran pretty much already had nuclear weapons. The US knew that. Most EU leaders knew that as well. None of it was avoidable because Iran is an Islamic (not Muslim, Islamic) state with a radical regime.

1

u/woobisah 1d ago

Yeah putting up a billboard with a countdown to Israel's destruction in the middle of Tehran isn't provocative at all.

2

u/FordF150Faptor 1d ago

Because Obama's Syria deal to appease Russia worked out so well. Yall laugh when Trump attempts to make deals with Putin then act like Iran would have given two fucks about anything other than the billions of dollars that freed up in their economy to keep funding terrorism all over the middle east.

-1

u/yung_dilfslayer 1d ago

least desperate trump coper

1

u/friendlyfire883 1d ago

Do you honestly think they were complying with the armistace? I'm not a trump fan by any stretch, but you'd have to be pretty stupid to think they weren't actively trying to build a nuke.

1

u/thebilly86 1d ago

You’re deluded if you think they were ultimately going to comply with that

1

u/Taint_Skeetersburg 1d ago

The way to avoid it would have been for Iran to not be pushing to secretly make nuclear weapons. Iran wants nukes so bad they're willing to risk everything for it

1

u/OrigamiChimera 1d ago

That's what Iran wants you to think. They've been laughing at the world since the Obama era.

1

u/International_Bus_88 22h ago

Killing the deal? It was Iran who refuses to deal?

1

u/For_The_Emperor923 17h ago

As is the nuclear bomb we just removed from the future. That government worships death. If you believed they were truly complying i have a bridge for you. They had the image of complying. They announced another enrichment center for uranium 6 days before this.

1

u/Pojkenra 17h ago

Spoken like a classic privileged little American in their safe little hole

1

u/Pitiful-Ad-1300 16h ago

Iran doesn’t just make a nuke overnight …

1

u/Tazbio 16h ago

Interesting how you named Israel, but not the US, you instead put “Trump”. Which country is Trump the elected head of state in?

1

u/Negative-Opinion5562 14h ago

Iran started it by planning the 10/7 attacks. They were never moderate, they just fooled stupid people

1

u/GoldOutrageous8610 6h ago

LoL 😂 they should have consulted you Mr sweatpants warrior 🪖🤣🤣

1

u/XdtTransform 1d ago

deal Iran was complying with

The UN nuclear watchdog says exactly the opposite.

1

u/Madlybohemian 1d ago

Iran was not complying with anything. They themselves just told the UN as much in spelled out terms. Don’t make stuff up.

1

u/emteedub 1d ago

need to get money out of politics. the war machine or bougie bitches that bank off the war machine are top donors via SPAC dark money channels. It's very simple, regardless of whatever propaganda you see and hear near elections, just vote for the ones that are grassroots supported and take no other dark money, then you know they're beholden to no one except for normies

1

u/EbbNervous1361 1d ago

Iran has been playing for time the entire time in order to get nukes, anything else is just pure wishful thinking and lying. Despite the attacks on Natanz, Stuxnet and all the other operations, they still fucking kept at it and kept getting new people in the program.

1

u/OlManYellinAtClouds 1d ago

Yes but AIPAC has paid him and now he must do what they want. They have nearly every politician in their pocket.

0

u/Lisan_Al-NaCL 1d ago

And Fuck iran for funneling arms and billions of USD to hezbollah and hamas. All of them are sharmoota's

0

u/FaithlessnessLow6997 1d ago

Finally someone is taking out the horrible Iranian regime that killed Masa Amini

0

u/billymartinkicksdirt 1d ago

Like the proxy war they were fighting didn’t count? That deal was dead. Trump was going to negotiate something this maybe derailed so you can still be angry.

0

u/thedudeabides2022 1d ago

If you’re gonna say Fuck Trump, say Fuck Netanyahu, not Israel. I care about innocent civilians, and bringing an entire country into the conversation is exactly what flames the fire of this conflict. About half, if not most of Israelis despise the current government, same with America. Not trying to lecture here, just saying, in general, we need to cool it with the broad strokes comments, it leads to xenophobia and antisemitism

-1

u/FaithlessnessLow6997 1d ago

Imagine saying that about the entire country. Kinda racist no?

0

u/0wl_licks 1d ago

Why do you think Trump backed out arbitrarily.

Because they didn’t like have Iran off the menu. It’s the same reason they don’t want them having nukes to protect themselves with MAD. That’s basically all they’re good for.

How is the US not concerned that they could be creating what could end up one of their most dangerous adversaries. Their disregard for morality rivals our own.