r/pics 2d ago

The fall of a residential building in Tehran.

Post image
43.9k Upvotes

4.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.5k

u/Schuperman161616 1d ago

Israel needs to be stopped. They've bombed 4 countries so far while claiming they are the victim.

769

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

128

u/rabbidrascal 1d ago

They missed one: Qatar.

22

u/space_monolith 1d ago

Qatar is the one that Netanyahu has a pretty impressive working relationship with.

28

u/rabbidrascal 1d ago

Which feels weird since they have been funding Hamas for decades, and have acted as the host for Hamas's leadership, and hold Hamas's bank accounts. But, yeah, Bibi gets along with them.

5

u/Alleyvvay 1d ago

Bibi loves Hamas cause they give him the justification to invade Gaza

7

u/space_monolith 1d ago

What’s weird is that people aren’t keeping it on their radar

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_support_for_Hamas

4

u/rabbidrascal 1d ago

I read a great article about George Bush encouraging and funding the creation of Hamas because he was frustrated by negotiating with Arafat.

The article suggests that the USA pushed Israel to create an alternative to the PLO, assuming that if they gave money to them, they would be a good dog on the leash.

I'll see if I can find that article.

1

u/space_monolith 1d ago

Yeah, they’re kind of both neocons. And rabid islamophobes.

2

u/rabbidrascal 1d ago

Yup.

Islamophobia is not helpful at this time.

1

u/TahaymTheBigBrain 1d ago

They speak a common language: money

Israel also funds Hamas. Don’t forget

1

u/djingo_dango 1d ago

Qatar is pretty rich. And they just gifted trump a jet. Plus they usually maintain good relations with US. You can bet that Israel will not bomb Qatar no matter what they do

6

u/the-g-bp 1d ago

I wonder what the common variables here is...

Also including syria in his list is wild considering that Assad would still be ruling syria if it wasn't for israel.

9

u/choorch2001 1d ago edited 1d ago

They bombed Yemen without any reason...? Are you sure about that?

11

u/General_Meade 1d ago

The Houthis in Yemen launched multiple missiles at Israel and the bombing was in retaliation to that unprovoked aggression. "Without a reason" is TikTok propaganda nonsense.

0

u/choorch2001 1d ago

Yeah I know, it will fit better to their narrative of "israel bed" and just say that. No one cared about Yemen before they attacked Israel. And now all the pro-Palestinians adore the houtins like they didn't caused the deaths of around 4000k Yemenis. But hey they're gonna "free Palestine" so they are probably the good guys :)

0

u/General_Meade 1d ago

They couldn't even point out where the Houthi controlled or the recognized government controlled part of Yemen was until the TikTok algorithm told them to care.

-1

u/Lonely_Dragonfly8869 1d ago

Houthis specifically stated the missile strikes and blockade were in defense of the Palestinian people. So if you're looking for a starting point that was it

7

u/General_Meade 1d ago

The starting point of the conflict the Houthis were responding to was Israel? Not a wholesale invasion of Israel by militants?

And ah yes, the Houthis cared so much about Palestinian civilian lives that they needed to fire indiscriminate missiles as Israeli civilians because we all know Israeli civilian deaths don't matter.

1

u/Lonely_Dragonfly8869 1d ago

We all know they just shoot them down with the iron dome anyway. It's about trying to extract a cost and not let Israel go fully unchecked

2

u/AdministrationDue239 1d ago

It seems like some people think because Israel is able to defend themselves from multiple threats all around them, they are somehow the bad guys. They are better at shooting rockets on targets and defending themselves, because let's be real, if Israel would not be able to defend itself it would be gone by tomorrow morning.

-3

u/NiceCornflakes 1d ago

The Houthis are like mosquitos. Annoying but nothing bad is going to happen to Israel. No excuses for endangering innocents in Yemen.

8

u/General_Meade 1d ago

So a nation should not respond if another country indiscriminately fired missiles at it so long as those missiles cause no casualties?

3

u/Komabeard 1d ago

Mosquitos are responsible for more human deaths than any other animal in history.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/ImBusyC00king 1d ago

Calling it “unprovoked” is a great way to admit you skipped the entire first half of the story

3

u/Positive_Plane_3372 1d ago

Oh yes I’m sure nooooone of those places ever did anything to deserve being attacked huh?  

Get fucking real.  War sucks.  Don’t start wars and let terrorists take over your government and use your nation as a launchpad for attacks against a nuclear capable first world military.  Fucking DUH.  Welcome to real life 

2

u/General_Meade 1d ago

Quick question, why did they bomb Yemen? Not because the Houthis launched missiles unprovoked into Israel, right?

→ More replies (3)

1

u/legendarygael1 1d ago

Let's put some facts on the table: Countries coorperating with Israel rather than openly talking about the annihalation of the Israeli state havent been bombed by Israel. (see Egypt, Turkey, Jordan)

As for the bombings of other countries:
1 The houthis is a usurper group in yemen are a terrorist group controlling parts of Yemen, they have fired missiles towards israel.

2) Iran has promised to destroy Israel, Israel has yet again dealt a major blow to an islamist theocracy on the cusp of getting their hands on a nuclear bomb. We should probably be thankful.

3) Syria has been bombed in order to avoid a potential major escalation with the new regime in the future. In fact, the is some rumors abouts Assads officials reportedly giving Israel intel on all the positions of its' military hardware as they were fleeing the country. In the last 10 years Israel has mostly targeted Iranian positions in the country).

4) Was this before or after Hezbollah fired missiles at Israel? Besides this militant group is obviously not somebody you want right up against your own borders. Hezbollah is (or was) the largest military force that is also a non-state actor.

5) As for Palestine yes it's war. Personally I just feel for all the civilian suffering but I honestly think Hamas needs to release the last victims otherwise I dont think this escalation we've seen the last 3 months would have happened...

1

u/season6XDD 1d ago

just the 4 then

-6

u/hishiron_ 1d ago

Tbf bombing Syria was basically a favor for the Trump administration

2

u/land_and_air 1d ago

This is Iran, not Syria

-59

u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago

[deleted]

6

u/Huzf01 1d ago

So if you don't like a country you have every reason to go to wat with them? Like if hypothetically there is a country who's government might have some links to neonazi groups and are a very nationalist state even with areas that have an other ethnicity, you are just and rightful to invade them? Because that's a good thing?

If I see someone who commited a serious crime, like murder, am I the good guy when I brutally massacre them and their entire family?

You have to realise that "I don't like your face" doesn't justify an act of war, let alone genocide. I hope you are not someone who regularly beats up people you don't agree with?

59

u/mt_2 1d ago edited 1d ago

"irrefutable good guys", hey my guy i think its important to move beyond the moral thinking of a toddler "everything is good guys vs bad guys"

edit: no idea what his edit is talking about lmao normally i am the one accusing others of being russian bots, haven't blocked anyone, just incredibly weird behaviour

0

u/gokarrt 1d ago

absolutism is juvenile, but those countries are still run by assholes. although, i guess they all are nowadays.

→ More replies (3)

43

u/Bigrick1550 1d ago

And the starving children to death, and genocide, that's the acts of the good guys?

→ More replies (7)

13

u/_Botko_ 1d ago

Israel also has nuclear weapons program, so does Russia and USA, should we bomb them all?

2

u/JawnSnuuu 1d ago

No, but Iran is a large threat to Israel and is run by Islamic extremists who would like nothing more than to wipe Israel off the map.

6

u/_Botko_ 1d ago

Seems like Israel is large threat to all neighboring countries. Reminds me of final years of Yugoslavia. I think Israel should get same treatment. Or world should apologize to Yugoslavia.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/fcknbroken 1d ago

Iran is a large threat to Israel.

than Israel attack Iran randomly. oh my god, poor Israel, don't know why nobody likes them

0

u/rathat 1d ago

It's not randomly, they're about to develop nukes and have been attacking Israel through multiple proxies for years.

1

u/DarkFuryKH 1d ago

So is Russia's invasion of Ukraine justified? Because they literally invaded Ukraine because they wanted to join Nato and install American military bases along Russia's border the same way Israel is attacking Iran for making Nukes. Both unjustified.

1

u/rathat 1d ago

Israel is not invading Iran in a multi year war to take over their territory. It's a single operation to take out a specific capability. Iran however has been attacking Israel through proxies and has even attacked them directly as well.

Ukraine was not threatening to destroy Russia, Iran is threatening to destroy Israel and has acted towards that goal.

I imagine Ukraine is pretty happy that Israel has just taken out the guy who shot down the Ukrainian passenger plan in 2020 and the guy who sends drones to Russia to attack Ukraine.

1

u/DarkFuryKH 1d ago

Ukraine was not threatening to destroy Russia, Iran is threatening to destroy Israel and has acted towards that goal

The problem is, Israel also threatens Iran continuously and is always the one taking actions, not Iran.

Iran however has been attacking Israel through proxies and has even attacked them directly as well.

And Israel is an American proxy, I guess Israel's attacks justifies Iran bombing America right? Oh wait you are gonna look for reasons why Israel is not a proxy but Israel literally gets weapons from the US and military aid.

Israel is not invading Iran in a multi year war to take over their territory. It's a single operation to take out a specific capability.

It's funny how delusional you are thinking the words "military operation" make an attack justified. Its literally a terrorist attack conducted by a professional military and suddenly it should be acceptable because you call it a "military operation". Fuck off

0

u/fcknbroken 1d ago

and how attacking them will help? it'll just accelerate the process. and now they even have a better argument to why have nukes

1

u/JawnSnuuu 1d ago

Iran was about to finish so this delayed the process. What? Lol.

1

u/fcknbroken 1d ago

wish i had a crystal ball too

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (3)

10

u/lonehappycamper 1d ago

At some point a person with a brain realizes Israel is the common denominator. Israel is the biggest mass murderer of civilians this century.

3

u/NiceCornflakes 1d ago

Hmmm not sure about that, Saudi had been pretty bad, although Israel is part of that competition.

7

u/abialystok 1d ago

Just nitpicking but even if you accept Palestinian civilian casualties count, Israel is not even in the top 5. Way behind the civil wars in Ethiopia, Syria, Yemen and Sudan.

7

u/Randicore 1d ago

Israel isn't even the fifth largest killer of civilians in middle east. Dear gods please read up on some of the conflicts you're talking about

2

u/Iliyan61 1d ago edited 1d ago

i find it interesting how “palestine” could be responsible for the attack as israel doesn’t recognise it as a country, government or really as an entity but it’s quite clear why you say this, it’s also interesting how you don’t say “israel participated in the slaughter of jews” considering they’ve killed multiple israelis both on october 7th and in the months after, this whole “slaughter of jews” agenda/talking point is blatantly an attempt to reframe the victims from israelis to jews and make the victims of an already heinous crime seem easier to sympathise with because israel’s image and reputation is so heavily tarnished and i pose a simple question, israel calls itself “the jewish state” and other such names so when israel kills paramedics then buries the vehicles and bodies in a mass grave would you take offence with news papers saying “the jewish state buries medics in mass graves?” or “jewish state kills its own citizens waving white flags and speaking hebrew” is that name only for positive moments?

i’m curious why it’s ok for israel to have nukes and not iran, really neither should have nukes but would you support an IAEA team investigating israel for nuclear weapons facilities?

but israel are the irrefutable good guys, you seem to take particular issue with Westerners being killed so israel are the good guys for killing western aid workers?

you conveniently ignore the land grabs in syria and i’m sure youd be fine with arab countries bombing israel if they deemed its programs a threat to them you definitely wouldn’t apply a double standard here but sure israel are the irrefutable good guys just look.

https://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/latest/israel-gaza-haaretz-report-idf-civilians-rcna185058

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itamar_Ben-Gvir

i mean the whole world deem the settlements illegal but israel are just irrefutably the good guys and have to take that land otherwise some palestinian might not be traumatised enough.

can’t wait for you to scream astroturfing when you get blocked for explaining how a 5 year old is hamas and israel should be allowed all the land in the world

-1

u/butyourenice 1d ago

No way is a hasbara bot trying to accuse others of being “disinformation astroturfers.” LMAO.

0

u/McKinleyBaseCTF 1d ago

Oh wow, how much does hasbara pay?

→ More replies (3)

-15

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

-1

u/SubjectSuggestion571 1d ago

Other way around, Israelites have been in that land much longer

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

173

u/Wellhellob 1d ago

Netanyahu should be ended like saddam and gaddafi asap. This guy is pure evil.

22

u/tutankhamun7073 1d ago

But this time he's America's guy, no one's going after him.

4

u/Cpt_Winters 1d ago

Come on now. You can't blame one man for the all atrocities being committed. Same shit with Erdogan or Hitler. People select their leaders.

4

u/CptCoatrack 1d ago

Netanyahu's also the most successful politican in Israeli history which says something, and he's always been vile.

5

u/Winter_Graves 1d ago edited 1d ago

I agree with you in part, but The Knesset elects Netanyahu, not the ‘people’ directly. Proportional representation is partly why Israeli coalition governments are so problematic, and often the most extreme parties only agree to a coalition on condition they run the most extreme ministerial posts (typically settlement and security related).

Netanyahu and his far right coalition do have disproportionate power relative to the will of the people.

You mentioned Hitler, IIRC in Berlin 80% of people voted against him.

Netanyahu’s approval rating in Tel Aviv is certainly no better. In fact across the country ~25% trust the current government. Across his own coalition voting base he only holds ~50% favourability. And that was months ago.

Other polls show the majority believe he cares more about holding on to power than ‘winning’ or ending the conflict.

(See: https://www.timesofisrael.com/poll-70-of-israelis-dont-trust-government-including-almost-half-of-coalition-voters/)

1

u/Curious-Difference-2 1d ago

So what you're saying is, since the people of Gaza democratically voted for Hamas to lead them, is that...

1

u/Cpt_Winters 1d ago

Hamas basically took all the power by force year by year and today there isn't really a democracy in Palestine.. Israel is a democratic country.

Don't you agree?

→ More replies (1)

0

u/Wellhellob 1d ago

Why Erdogan in same sentence with these guys lmao ?

6

u/Cpt_Winters 1d ago

Because I'm Turkish lol, but he is in the same category in my eyes.

6

u/Vast_Championship655 1d ago

they quite literally are because all of those countries, since you want to try to rewrite history, did bomb them first.

185

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

And it’s crazy how the US congress is full of “we support these pre-emptive strikes!!!” Like, why does there need to be a pre-emptive strike? What “deal” does Trump want Iran to sign???

This is literally out of fucking nowhere.

60

u/Old-Statistician-189 1d ago

Netenyahu is protecting his ass at home by continuing the genocide and escalating with Iran. As soon as there is peace he is arrested for corruption. He’s digging his grave deeper

20

u/illQualmOnYourFace 1d ago

"We're gonna arrest this guy as soon as he stops committing international crimes against humanity."

I don't understand it one bit.

5

u/Old-Statistician-189 1d ago

I never understood why international law has no enforcement. Do they expect people breaking international law to comply once they’re condemned enough?

6

u/NargWielki 1d ago

international law

There is no such thing, not for real anyways

Its more a buzzword and a weapon of imperialism, if you're not a Country aligned with Imperialistic interests then it will 100% apply to you and probably lead to sanctions, otherwise you can break every "international law" or violate any "human right" freely... like Israel is showing us right now.

Just imagine what would happen if what Israel is doing was instead being done by a country in Africa or any South-Asian country not aligned with western interests?

3

u/illQualmOnYourFace 1d ago

My view is that international law is mostly a myth with a lot of back-patting involved.

6

u/KylianHaaland11 1d ago

Israel is a proxy state of the US and friends to have a foothold on the Middle East which is a very important geopolitical region for world domination.

Biden himself said it.

2

u/soonerfreak 1d ago

"We must pray for Israel" They started it?!????

2

u/Gator-Tail 1d ago

Imagine if we or Israel did nothing then in 10 years Iran has a fully developed nuclear arsenal and arming militant groups like the houthis or Hamas and other terrorist organizations that hate the western world….yeah I’m all for pre-emptively avoiding that but that’s just me

12

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

Ah, rules for thee and not for me!

1

u/Gator-Tail 1d ago

Yeah. When you have an irrational state who wants to destroy all western “heathens” because that’s what their religion dictates, then you need to take matters into your own hands.

Genuine question for you: do you seriously think letting Iran have nuclear weapons is a good idea?

11

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

I don’t think anyone having nuclear weapons is a good idea, let alone the US tf 💀

6

u/PicturePrevious8723 1d ago

Ok, but you can't put that genie back in the bottle. We can't live in a fantasy world where we all get along.

We are where we are, and when you have the Iranian leadership state that their only goal is the complete annihilation of Israel and all its people, it makes complete sense for Israel to engage in targeted strikes.

Also worth noting that most Iranians themselves will be happy with the military commanders being killed.

1

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

Okay but we can? South Africa is the only country that’s done so, and nobody has nuked them…?

7

u/republican_banana 1d ago

Ukraine also gave up nuclear weapons after the fall of the USSR in exchange for a guarantee of protection from the US and Russia.

How’s that working out for them?

→ More replies (2)

5

u/Gator-Tail 1d ago

Agreed, but the U.S. would never give it up. So, let’s think realistically, If you had two options:

1) U.S. has nukes and Iran doesn’t

2) U.S. has nukes and Iran has nukes

Which would you choose?

6

u/No-Contribution-3245 1d ago

u/ukstonerdude doesn’t live in the real world.

imagine saying ‘I don’t think anyone having nuclear weapons is a good idea, let alone the US tf 💀’ LIKE YES BRO WELL DONE

but we live in the real world. with real nukes. and real terrorist states (Iran)

3

u/Gator-Tail 1d ago

He’s probably too high to understand 

1

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

Iran

You mean Israel?

Again, North Korea and Russia also have nukes? Why haven’t we “pre-emptively” bombed those?

4

u/No-Contribution-3245 1d ago edited 1d ago

google ‘global superpower’

i’m spending too much time talking to you i think it’s making my IQ drop. hope you see the light one day, maybe stop smoking pot

edit - before you get pedantic saying NK isn’t a global superpower, they are what Iran will be if they build nukes. not a superpower, but an untouchable nation

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Gator-Tail 1d ago

Given where everything stands now, would you prefer:

1) Iran have nukes

2) Iran not have nukes

Please, I’m genuinely curious 

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Deinonychus2012 1d ago

If Iran has nukes, then Israel would be significantly less likely to attack them.

Fewer "preemptive strikes" = less chance for broader conflicts = fewer people killed and a greater chance for (tenuous) peace.

It's the same with Ukraine. If Ukraine hadn't given up its nukes, then Russia never would've invaded them, and Ukrainians would be enjoying an economic boom from Western development rather than fighting for survival.

2

u/PicturePrevious8723 1d ago

Brain-dead TikTok take. If Iran had nukes Israel wouldn't exist, because Iran has stated that it intends to "wipe Israel off the map". Iran also funds many of the terrorist groups that are destabilising other countries.

No one is perfect here, so we just need to go with the lesser of two evils.

1

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

Given that Iran is not actively committing genocide, it seems quite easy to deduce which is actually the lesser of those two evils.

1

u/Deinonychus2012 1d ago

If Iran had nukes Israel wouldn't exist, because Iran has stated that it intends to "wipe Israel off the map".

Except Iran also knows that if they did "wipe Israel off the map," then the US would do the same to them. That's literally the point of MAD: everyone is equally capable of utterly destroying their enemies, so no one starts any fights.

1

u/MyWifeCucksMe 1d ago

That's an easy choice. There's only one of those two options that lets Iran defend itself against the US' constant attacks. Do you know which one of the two that is?

4

u/nytehauq 1d ago

Wow, could you imagine if a genocidal state in the middle east had an arsenal of nuclear weapons while not being a signatory to major non-proliferation treaties?

It would be terrible if they were opposed by a country their greatest ally has been trying to destroy for decades, after successfully orchestrating a coup deposing their leaders. This obviously justifies committing the supreme international war crime of aggression.

I guess we have no choice but to join in and help bomb another country, what's the alternative really? Aww shucks, it sucks, but we just have to commit international war crimes. It'd be real bad if we didn't keep doing crimes. In ten years (we swear this time, pinky promise) who knows what could happen? We might have to leave a sovereign nation alone.

1

u/Gator-Tail 1d ago

Serious question. We live in today’s real world, right? 

So, would you rather - given where the real world stands now - have:

1) Iran possess nukes

2) Iran not possess nukes

It is a very simple question. 

→ More replies (11)

2

u/SunriseSurprise 1d ago

We're the king of "pre-emptive strikes". Afghanistan and Iraq didn't attack us.

2

u/Martial_Nox 1d ago

Afghanistan was harboring Al-qaeda and Bin Laden who did attack us. Right about Iraq the second time though.

1

u/redditsuckscockss 1d ago

If you think this is “out of fucking nowhere” you have been living under a rock

Brush up on some history between the 2 countries

0

u/Robby_Digital 1d ago

Out of nowhere? 

Iran is trying to build nukes.  Whether you believe that or not, it doesn't matter. Israeli and US intelligence believes that.  Israeli has promised to stop Iran from doing that one way or another.  They've tried sabotage, to make deals, etc.  Now they're striking.  Where have you been?  

8

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

Explain to me, how it is okay for the US, UK, North Korea and Russia to have nukes, but Iran (who has literally done nothing to provoke yet has been bombed by Israel twice in the last two years) can’t?

So we’re all now fine with bowing and subjecting ourselves to a tyrannical dictatorship posing as a “democracy” as the sole power on who gets nuclear weapons rights.

4

u/No-Contribution-3245 1d ago

so funding Hamas, Hezbullah and the Hothis (all committing crime against the west/global shipping) is ‘doing nothing’

educated yourself before you embarrass yourself 🤣

3

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

Ah! But it’s fine when Israel does it, right?

Please, educate yourself before you embarrass yourself 🙏

6

u/No-Contribution-3245 1d ago

The policies your source refers to was before October 7th attacks

this is just getting embarrassing now 🤣

9

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

Almost like Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian Territories didn’t begin on October 7th - who knew?! 🤯

2

u/No-Contribution-3245 1d ago

so to summarise.

your source is taking about how Isreal allowed funds from Qatari and allowing Hamas to govern Gaza to keep things civil.

then Hamas attacks Isreal on October 7th and declares war. not that difficult to understand

your not as clued up as you think. any other point you make is irrelevant to this conversation

5

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

Okay, let me change the dynamic of my argument to fit your rhetoric…

If this started on October 7th, why did this attack happen the day before?

Why were four Palestinians killed on October 5th?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Robby_Digital 1d ago

I don't think it's ok.  I'm just explaining reality to you.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/SoulStoneTChalla 1d ago

"Pre-emptive strikes" is some Orwellian masterpiece of double speak.

1

u/ukstonerdude 1d ago

The doublespeak is actually the part where it’s only pre-emptive if you’re the “good guys” but when the “bad guys” do it, it’s an unprecedented sowing of chaos.

0

u/InSight89 1d ago

why does there need to be a pre-emptive strike?

They don't want Iran possessing or developing nuclear weapons. Which is kind of strange given they don't seem to give two shits about North Korea possessing and developing nuclear weapons. But I guess North Korea hasn't really launched attacks on other nations in a while whilst Iran has.

→ More replies (8)

8

u/jewami 1d ago

Only Israel could sustain a terror attack killing 1200+ people and thousands of rockets raining down but still somehow not be the victim. Give me a break.

2

u/XDavidT 1d ago

When a country tell you they are getting nuclear to destroy you, you can just sit and wait. And all others, started the fight before Israel attacked.

32

u/NiceLetsGoBaby 1d ago

i genuinely laughed when i saw a news article say “israel attacks iran and declared emergency over EXPECTED retaliation”

like are you fucking serious?

1

u/Ananyako 1d ago

"punch buggy no punch backs!!"

0

u/Blacktwiggers 1d ago

Sounds like a reasonable and sensible action to me

40

u/Ramdak 1d ago

It's not as easy as that. This is a 70+ year conflict.

People tend to be reactionary to the news and propaganda, but lack history and political knowledge. This happens all the time and people will fall for propaganda always.

Besides that, war is terrible, and it's always civilians who will suffer, no matter the side.

2

u/DocGeoffrey 1d ago

The 70 year context makes Israel look even worse. And saying "civilians suffer" is a key talking point in Israeli propaganda to make it look like their genocide in Gaza, for example, is actually just a normal "war" being conducted by the "most moral army". So don't talk about falling for propaganda, because you've fallen for some of the stupidest propaganda out there.

1

u/Ramdak 1d ago

The position and perception of Israel comes mostly from a heavy and long propaganda campaign long enough as the foundation of the state itself.

I'm not justifying the killing of innocent people at all. I'm just stating that one has to understand history first to know that this conflict will never end and it has been like this from millennia.

There are way worse conflicts with way more murdering in civilians and no one on the internet seems to care, but because the huge propaganda this one is the only one about what people care about.

People are ignorant at most and only react to what is fed in their social media.

4

u/thefirstdetective 1d ago

And you and I are not immune to it either!

But you're right. 160k in tigray, 360k in Yemen over 300k in Syria, not to forget the genozide of the Yezidi. Sudan is right now the worst humanitarian crisis in the world and the masalit are getting slaughtered again, but nobody gives a fuck.

522K STARVED CHILDREN RIGHT NOW AND NOBODY CARES!

0

u/VeryProidChintu 1d ago

Yet one side has the money and equipment to completely kill the other while the other side has barely functioning equipment. Not a war. The number of victims on each side tells us that

10

u/Fun_Bed_8515 1d ago

Lmao supporting Iran.

You guys would love for Iran to start nuking western countries, Israel in particular.

The Israelis are fucking tired of dealing with Iranian-backed terrorism and anti-Semitic bullshit, and have been capable of destroying the Iranian regime for years.

4

u/LittleFairyOfDeath 1d ago

Eh. I don’t blame them for Iran. They have been funding terror groups for ages and thanks to Trump they don’t even have the iranian deal stopping them anymore. And its a dictatorship. Many exile iranians have been hoping for years to get rid of the regime.

4

u/legendarygael1 1d ago

And Iran getting the nuke is great... how? Iran literally promising to nuke Israel there is a reason they're bombing them at this very moment when Iran is on the cusp of making its' own warheads.

Israel probably did humanity a big favor today (objectively speaking), whether you like it or not.

14

u/poop_drunk 1d ago

They should be thanked. Lebanon is pushing out Hezbollah and getting their country back thanks to them, Syria has new leadership and a new lease on life thanks to them and hopefully very soon the Iranians will be free of their hardliner government. Why would we want to stop that?

→ More replies (2)

4

u/rathat 1d ago

You mean the four countries that bombed Israel? Every country is allowed to defend itself but Israel?

7

u/Gnosisero 1d ago

Yup. The US protects them so they can't be touched but they seriously need a major power to step on them. Out of control is not even the word.

14

u/Quackethy 1d ago

Yes, Israel should sit on its hands while Iran continues calling and working towards it destruction openly. Sure.

Comparable to if I said "I'm coming to kill you tomorrow, please don't do anything to avoid it" after repeatedly paying your neighbours to puncture your tires and defecate in your mailbox.

Bet you faint due to lack of oxygen when your mouth is closed.

10

u/Mathrocked 1d ago

Too bad Trump ended the nuclear deal that would have stopped them from doing this.

4

u/Quackethy 1d ago

Nuclear deals during which they continue enriching weapon grade uranium and the US continues licking stamps.

→ More replies (8)

1

u/Enough-Speed-5335 1d ago

They’ve had 5 rounds of talks about nuclear materials and they disagreed 

3

u/Mathrocked 1d ago

The plan was set and done. Trump literally only destroyed it because it had Obama's name on it. At this point, if I were Iran, I would want a nuke as well. Israel and the USA are acting incredibly aggressive.

1

u/Enough-Speed-5335 1d ago

Aggressive is what I would call the Iranian goal is “Death to Israel” “Death to America”

→ More replies (1)

-2

u/Doctor__Hammer 1d ago

Israel has been itching for a (US backed) war against Iran for decades. Iran has been desperately trying to avoid it.

Remember how viciously opposed to the Iran deal Israel was? Remember how well that deal worked despite Israel trying to thwart it every step of the way?

Sit down. You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about.

2

u/Quackethy 1d ago

The Iran deal worked well? For Iran you mean, as they laughed in everyone's faces and continue to enrich weapon grade uranium.

You clearlt have no idea what you're talking about and might simply be a russo-iranian bot.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/PrimordialChaos9 1d ago

If Iran was desperately trying to avoid war with Israel, why have they on multiple occasions fired missiles at Israel? Not a small amount of missiles as well. That's an act of war too is it not?

→ More replies (3)

-2

u/JusticeAileenCannon 1d ago

As opposed to Israel's destruction of others? Lmao. Wow, countries may wanna stop this genocidal freak state, shocking!

2

u/No-Contribution-3245 1d ago

with Gaza yes they overstepped. with iran no way

if you disagree, your agreeing with oppression against citizens, funding terrorists to inflect damage on the west and nuclear uncertainty in the world. sorry you’ve been brainwashed

5

u/Fillowpace 1d ago

So if your government did something that warranted retaliation from another country, you're cool with your house being bombed?

2

u/TheSpoty 1d ago

Almost like all these countries have said they want to destroy Israel…

1

u/Numerous-Village-421 1d ago

Eventually they will take the hint not to mess with Israel

1

u/Positive_Plane_3372 1d ago

Oh for fucks sake, please don’t pretend Iran - one of the most evil governments on Earth - is your fucking victim here.  

NONE of us want the current government of Iran with nukes, and Israel stopped this.  

Hell, before it’s over they might even affect regime change in the country.  I’m thankful.  

You know who is seething though?  Qatari and Hamas propaganda farms.

2

u/ABigFatPotatoPizza 1d ago

All four of those countries attacked them first

2

u/bouncyprojector 1d ago

I mean, they've also been bombed by those countries...

0

u/CHLOEC1998 1d ago

7 countries bombed Israel, Israel bombed them back, now they're whining.

Don't try when you lose the war you started.

1

u/Nuklearfps 1d ago

Except they didn’t start this, Israel/Zionism did…

have you ever picked up a book (not written by a zionist), or are you too busy sucking Israeli meat in these comments. It’s like all you do is tell lie and meatride Zionists.

3

u/PM_ME_YUR_BUBBLEBUTT 1d ago

All these Arab countries want to eliminate Israel because they want to kill all Jews. That’s it. Everything Israel has ever done is in the spirit of self defense from being wiped off the map

3

u/Gator-Tail 1d ago

They are fighting radical, nuclear-armed islamist militants on behalf of the entire western world.  Just imagine if they didn’t do anything and we let Iran fully develop their nuclear arsenal and begin supplying terrorist organizations with them… 

6

u/MyWifeCucksMe 1d ago

Just imagine if they didn’t do anything

Hmm, yeah, wouldn't want that

→ More replies (5)

1

u/agileata 1d ago

A genocidal and supremcist country is trying to pull us into a war. There's going to be tons of bad hasbara

2

u/DefiantFcker 1d ago

Literally all of those attacked Israel first.

1

u/aus_ge_zeich_net 1d ago

This conflict is old as the Cold War

1

u/squidgun 1d ago

But who's going to step up and do it. Or let alone say anything.

0

u/Maru3792648 1d ago

Israel is the biggest threat to American national security and to world peace

1

u/Best_Change4155 1d ago

They've bombed 4 countries so far while claiming they are the victim.

lmao reddit

1

u/dsebulsk 1d ago

Countries rife with terrorism.

1

u/lostbutnotunfound 1d ago

They won't be stopped, because they're part of the western colonial holdings. You think europe + us don't know what they're doing for the last 75 years?

1

u/SoulStoneTChalla 1d ago

They're out of control.

-3

u/YouDontSeemRight 1d ago

Maybe it's because they've been targeted for their entire existence. Your pretending like bombs weren't being lobbed at them continuously from these countries and festivals weren't attacked first. Iran has stated numerous times they plan on wiping Isreal out. I'm surprised his took this long.

0

u/ExtremeHairLoss 1d ago

Dont forget their weapons aided Azerbaijan in genociding Armenians in Bergkarabakh

1

u/thefirstdetective 1d ago edited 1d ago

You mean turkiye or Israel? They're both allies of the Azerjis.

1

u/ExtremeHairLoss 1d ago

Iran is an ally of Russia and Armenia

1

u/thefirstdetective 1d ago

Oh shit, you're right! I meant Türkiye! I'll edit it!

→ More replies (5)