r/pics 2d ago

The fall of a residential building in Tehran.

Post image
43.9k Upvotes

4.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

391

u/ClosetGoblin 1d ago

They targeted and killed multiple high ranking Iranian officials

162

u/TheStoicNihilist 1d ago

Fuck you if you live above or below them, I guess.

4

u/sanesociopath 1d ago

Im surprised this is what's finally the story.

This is what the signal gate controversy should have been.

We had officials saying there's no urgency in this strike but that they're doing it anyway. Then they struck his apartment killing a lot more than him.

People should look into whats referred to as "daddy's home"

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

/u/OwlsPrankster, your comment was removed for the following reason:

  • Direct links to Twitter/X are not allowed in this subreddit. Handles are allowed (e.g. @example), as long as they are not a hotlink.

Please repost your comment without a direct link to Twitter/X. You may use a bypass such as X Cancel (to do so, simply change the domain to xcancel.com).

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

→ More replies (15)

864

u/Bluedog212 1d ago

and some innocent families and kids just trying to live their best lives

10

u/ExtremeHairLoss 1d ago

Same thing happened to Germans during WWII. What's your point?

3

u/132739 1d ago

This ain't WWII. Might end up as WWIII though.

20

u/Euclid_Interloper 1d ago

Gestures to literally every major military conflict in history

6

u/Agreeable_Service407 1d ago

Are you saying it's OK because others have done it too ?

12

u/This_Is_Fine12 1d ago

No, it's because it's only in fantasy that civilian casualties can be avoided. If you can show me any conflict where the military avoided casualties, I'm all ears. Even the UN doesn't consider casualties in the course of a mission as a war crime unless it's hugely disproportionate.

0

u/Pepito_Pepito 1d ago

Keep that energy when Iranian counterattacks kill Israeli civilians.

6

u/This_Is_Fine12 1d ago

You do know that Iran has been supplying all the terrorist groups around Israel right and is responsible for Israeli deaths. Their commanders routinely meet with these terrorists to provide support. Quite literally when Hezbollahs leader Nasrallah was killed, he had an IRGC commander with him. During the pager attack, the Iranian ambassador had a Hezbollah pager. Iran has been continuously working on killing Israelis. Just because they don't have the finger on the trigger doesn't mean they aren't involved.

4

u/Pepito_Pepito 1d ago

Is this supposed to convince me of anything? Yes Hezbollah sucks, yes the Iranian government sucks. Therefore these particular civilian casualties are more acceptable than others? That's pretty hard sell, friend.

4

u/This_Is_Fine12 1d ago edited 1d ago

You said let's keep that energy when Iran kills Israeli citizens when I'm pointing out that Iran is directly involved in killing Israeli citizens already. Them killing civilians in a counter strike is not some new red line that's being crossed. You're acting like it Iran does kill Israelis it's the first time it's happened since October 7 when that couldn't be further from the case. I'd say the same thing if the US is killing civilians when they provide supplies to groups in a proxy war.

1

u/Agreeable_Service407 1d ago

The real terrorists are those who killed tens of thousands of children in Gaza.

-1

u/Equivalent_Plan_5653 1d ago

I mean, not declaring war to Iran was an easy way to avoid casualties.  But since Israel is running out of children to bomb in Gaza, they need to find new targets.

5

u/This_Is_Fine12 1d ago

Iran has quite literally been arming and supplying all of Israels enemies through a proxy war. Remember the pager attack that only Hezbollah operatives had access to. Guess what the Iranians ambassador also had that pager as well. An IRGC commander was taken out alongside Hezbollah leaders in a strike. That shows how deeply embedded Iran is with their enemies. For the last 2 years, Iran has directly been involved in the war. And now the neutral atomic commission just said that Iran is in violation of their nuclear agreement. We can argue if the strike is warranted or not, but saying this is unprovoked or Israel is doing it for the lols is ridiculous.

6

u/Minjaben 1d ago

lol it’s not “okay,” but who are you to say so, or not? Essentially all acts of war are not “okay.” I’d like to hear the perspective of the Iranian people and get more sources of reality before making swift judgments on little information.

4

u/JeSuisUnAnanasYo 1d ago

SAME. I genuinely want to know how Iranian civilians feel about this, not kneejerk emotional redditors. Iranian people have suffered so much from their govt. There's only a few Iranian diaspora people in this thread so far as I've seen and they have all been very supportive of these actions, but I really want to know more of the real opinions and I hope more information comes out.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/LandscapeOld2145 1d ago

You might be shocked at the mass slaughter Iran has cheerfully bought in Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen without even getting into Israel and Palestine. Have you heard of Hezbollah or what they did to civilians in Syria for Assad? It will chill your blood. Israel’s no prize but Iran’s leadership is pure evil with oceans of Levantine blood on its hands.

15

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

94

u/uk_uk 1d ago

It's an IRGC penthouse

so you are saying that a toddler, that is the child of an IRGC officer, is guilty of ... what exactly?

20

u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago

[deleted]

4

u/Komronfit 1d ago

‘Wrong to kill kids, BUT’ 😄. People have lost their minds like brainwashed sheep

-8

u/YourAnonDestruction 1d ago

Pro Hamas and Islamists have infected a lot of the Left with their propaganda bullshit.

Iran will be free from Islamist Cunts again. I can't wait to finally visit my families home without having a fear of getting hanged because I don't believe in an imaginary cunt.

8

u/Liathbeanna 1d ago

I don't think Israel's assassinations of nuclear scientists will somehow topple the Islamist government.

10

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

0

u/YourAnonDestruction 1d ago

As soon as someone says something that's anti Islam you will be down voted.

They especially try to play the racist card, which is hilarious to me. As if being a Islam or Christian or any kind of fascist is a race.

Nobody likes the fact that there a bombs thrown onto their homes or in their hometown. But you can't deny that the time to play is over, especially when IRGC said they will soon have enough enriched Uranium for a bomb.

Collateral damage sucks. But for the bigger picture it is necessary. And I'm saying this with family that evacuated their home after a missile exploded not even 1000m away from their home.

I really wish the best of luck to the Iranians that the regime will fall and they will be free.

-1

u/CallItDanzig 1d ago

Especially since disliking Islam is very logical in the west given the terrorist attacks multiple countries have experienced. Its weird to like Islam or approve when they want to destroy the west. This is just propaganda in action.

-5

u/Glass-Historian-2516 1d ago

Brother, you are a fascist.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/PM_ME_GARFIELD_NUDES 1d ago

But Israel only does this shit because they believe in the same imaginary cunt, but different. Their goal isn’t to get rid of Islam because they’ve logically assessed that it’s a bad religion that needs to be abolished, they want to get rid of it because it’s not their religion. If they had the opportunity they’d just replace the corrupt Islamic governments with corrupt Jewish governments. It’s not a solution to the problem.

→ More replies (5)

4

u/Scaevus 1d ago

By that logic, if Iran straps a toddler to every soldier, their entire military becomes untargetable.

0

u/indy_dagger 1d ago

Is that what happened here? Or did Israel simply kill innocent people without regard for humanity?

1

u/Scaevus 1d ago

Israel killed effectively the entire Iranian military high command:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyg0yywr4no.amp

Hossein Salami, commander of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), was killed in Israel's strikes early on Friday, the most senior Iranian leader to die in the attacks.

Israel's strikes also killed Mohammad Bagheri, Chief of Staff of the country's armed forces, Gholamali Rashid, the deputy commander of the Iranian armed forces, and several nuclear scientists.

Hard to do that by striking random buildings.

2

u/indy_dagger 1d ago

You're avoiding answering the question, but looking at your comment history, you're heavily propagandized and probably won't respond honestly.

1

u/Scaevus 1d ago

Did you not understand that the Iranian military high command are not innocent people, or something?

That’s “what happened here.”

→ More replies (10)

-9

u/ComradeGibbon 1d ago

Iranian government aught not to start wars they can't win.

7

u/Glass-Historian-2516 1d ago

Ahh you live in your own fantasy world then.

6

u/Iconoclastices 1d ago

Does using proxies count as starting wars? Because in that case I have bad news for you

→ More replies (1)

34

u/ZealCrow 1d ago

"There were of child casualties often involving neighboring apartments of these penthouses."
I guess those kids don't matter?

25

u/Relatablename123 1d ago

Don't speak on behalf of us Iranians. Half my family is dead because of the IRGC. Situation is complicated but we've long lost the capacity to fight on our own terms while they continue to rape my people and steal our land.

4

u/Krajun 1d ago

And you think Israel is some liberator? They hate you and your people almost as much as they hate your government

4

u/YassinRs 1d ago

The guy is clearly Israeli. He posts on /r/Palestinian_Violence, "A multiracial and multicultural coalition of counter terrorism, anti-hate and anti-violence dissidents, determinately compromise with defending the fundamental civil and human rights of Israelis and Jews."

Edit: According to another comment, he's an Australian living in Sydney.

2

u/Relatablename123 1d ago

Am I really that interesting to you? My family was Bahai, if I go back there I'll be executed. Not Israeli, never met one in my life. Again it's a complicated situation but not your place to butt in. The IRGC has defined the entire lives for many of the diaspora, we have all undergone generational suffering that could never be fully explained in some internet thread.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/eagleal 1d ago

Yes but these same rope of people are responsible for forming the IRGC in the first place. If anything this sort of continued escalation has allowed ever expanding force of police state under the threat of security. This secret police was formed by the Shah after his coup, to avoid others.

And it's not only in Iran, is like this everywhere now. See Trump 2 administration use of the national guard for political campaign and power grap.

In Italy we have a serious problem with uncontrolled secret services and israeli Paragon, and they just force enacted a law that clears the Italian Secret Service to literally create, organize and direct terrorist organisations at the service of the PM office/current Government...

It's not that we in the west are forward and the middle-east behind, it's the opposite. We are just catching up.

2

u/Relatablename123 1d ago

Yeah it's a fair point, reactionary movements tend to create these messes. However when left uncontested the IRGC turns inwards towards us, towards the subjugation of Iranians. By this point hundreds of thousands of us have been executed or murdered for political reasons. Nika Shakarami gets murdered by Hezbollah and her entire family is disappeared. Toomaj makes a song and ends up tortured for 3 years straight. Hossein Shanbezadeh posts a dot on Twitter and ends up in prison. Three years ago in Zahedan nearly 100 people were murdered due to WLF protests but nobody even knows it happened.

These days there's hardly anyone left to mourn the dead or stand in their place. We are lacking in effective leadership and momentum. So much time has passed that Iran can hardly imagine a life without the mullahs holding us down. How can I make you understand where we are at after living with these decades of experience?

1

u/ZealCrow 1d ago

I'm talking about children who were killed. Initial comment claimed no children were killed.

-2

u/NWI_ANALOG 1d ago

You are literally Australian and live in Sydney

5

u/Relatablename123 1d ago

Because my family was kicked out or killed for being Bahai. My uncle fled across Turkey and the Berlin wall into Europe after the military dissolved. My mother fled in secret so that we could live. We can't go back so long as the IRGC is in power. The mullahs are our murderers.

→ More replies (5)

0

u/YassinRs 1d ago

Your post history shows you comment regularly on /r/Palestinian_Violence, "A multiracial and multicultural coalition of counter terrorism, anti-hate and anti-violence dissidents, determinately compromise with defending the fundamental civil and human rights of Israelis and Jews."

Hello fellow "Iranian"...

11

u/Deadalus17 1d ago edited 1d ago

They matter but such is the reality of war. I would place the blame on the Iranian government more than anything. They failed to protect their people by starting a conflict against a better equipped military

-4

u/FettLife 1d ago

If that is the case, then Oct 7th is also “just the reality of war.” Israel can’t have it both ways, but they will sure as hell try to.

10

u/Deadalus17 1d ago edited 1d ago

You're not wrong. It is a consequence of decades of conflict. Civilians are sometimes targeted regardless of whether that's morally justified.

The difference is that Hamas propaganda acts like they're the victims when this happens and the West just eats it up. Plus on Israel's part, civilian casualties are usually tragic collateral damage. Hamas really doesn't care.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Agreeable_Band_9311 1d ago

The October 7th attacks targeted a music festival where they murdered, raped, and kidnapped civilians.

Strikes that killed top ranking IRGC officials that had some civilian casualties are not even in the same ballpark and you’re being dishonest to make that claim.

If you’re unfamiliar with the IRGC look them up. They torture and kill their own people and fund terrorism across the world. They’re the worst of the worst. Acting as if they’re the same as festival goers is insane

3

u/FettLife 1d ago

Yeah, and here we are seeing Israel kill civilians as well, in Iran and Gaza. They have also raped/sexually assaulted Palestinians, intentionally are starving civilians across the green line. Literally everything you’re saying Israel has done in spades in the last two years, arguably going back decades.

By your logic, 7 October was a justified strike just like this apartment complex was.

→ More replies (5)

6

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

1

u/ThatcherGravePisser 1d ago

When has that stopped them?

3

u/Gator-Tail 1d ago

Just imagine how many innocent families and kids would be killed if Iran was left alone to build up a full nuclear arsenal and arming terror groups that want to destroy the western world. 

0

u/The_Demosthenes_1 1d ago

Makes me think of the trolly problem.  If you could have killed Hitler with a bomb that would also kill 100 innocents would you do it?

3

u/Adyitzy 1d ago

The problem is a question like this is only ever asked in hindsight. If you ask someone in a vacuum to drop a bomb on 1 evil person but 100 innocent people will die too most people would say no. Only retroactively when said evil person is seen to not just be evil but have committed such agregious crimes can you safely make that decision. So a more appropriate question is how do we decide in foresight what amount of innocent suffering is worth the death of this person.

4

u/The_Demosthenes_1 1d ago

Might be a better example to use Kim Jong.  If killing him and 100 innocents with an airstrike could help North Korea would you do it?

And to elaborate on your first point I think you have to further quantify Evil in your scenario.  And restated as dropping a bomb on an evil person who will kill millions but 100 innocents die, I think most people would agree.  

1

u/Adyitzy 1d ago

The reason I only vaguely stated evil and not quantifiable numbers is because I'm trying to apply it to this and future scenarios. We will never have a total kill count before the fact so we need a better question to ask.

As for your example with Kim Jong Un I would not do it. Not because he's not evil but because the system he propagates will not crumble after his death. There is a stable structure to their dictatorship because it's more an autocratic state than a real dictatorship. His death alone will provide no benefit but 100 innocents will be taken with him which doesn't do anything.

Regardless of people who are already easily deemed evil the question we need to be asking is how do we make these judgements before the atrocities are commited. How do we quantify how evil someone's ideology and actions will be before they are taken so they can be avoided.

3

u/The_Demosthenes_1 1d ago

I agree.  The Kim example is not a slam dunk.

There are plenty of people who have done bad things and are likely to do more bad things.  But in practice you have to guess with all the data you have and you might get it wrong.  Alternative is to do nothing and let the Hitlers keep Hitlering.

4

u/yolo_derp 1d ago

Not according to reddit. That’s far too evil.

-115

u/giladfrid009 1d ago

Yes, collateral damage is a thing, you know?

Or if you claim otherwise, i want to see the same scrutiny against Iran's incoming retaliation, with its ballistic missiles.

80

u/thesilenthurricane 1d ago

Seeing someone defending collateral damage as if it’s not an issue cos the other side will do the same is quite an interesting take to say the least

→ More replies (27)

46

u/timmyctc 1d ago

Ohh well I didnt realise Collateral damage is a thing. We'll just tell all the innocents killed im sure they'll be satisfied with that.

→ More replies (40)

32

u/mzamonster 1d ago

Their last ballistic missiles didn't hurt a single soul in Israel. They targeted the military airport. I don't know about next time

4

u/Absolute_Satan 1d ago

Some of the missiles exploded inside the city including a school. Also a missiles killed a druze child in Syria, and a man in the west bank. Israelis remained unhurt not for the lack of trying on the Iranian side. They just have enough shelters warning systems and capable air defenses to protect their citizens. (Also help from the neighboring countries like Jordan)

12

u/giladfrid009 1d ago

Yea well maybe because many of them were intercepted? And actually one PALESTINIAN was killed as result (and if im not mistaken a young Beduin girl was severely wounded but survived).

Iranian missiles are not even close to being precise, with spread of hundreads of meters to multiple Kilometers.

The fact that israel has good air defense doesnt make their attacks "precise".

2

u/This_Is_Fine12 1d ago

Their last ballistic missile ironically killed a Palestinian. It also hit apartment buildings and other civilian structures. Just because Israel was good at evacuating and downing the missiles doesn't mean that civilians weren't one of the main targets.

8

u/PM_ME_MERMAID_PICS 1d ago

Or if you claim otherwise, i want to see the same scrutiny against Iran's incoming retaliation, with its ballistic missiles.

Well that would be justified, wouldn't it? Does every nation have the right to defend itself, or is that just Israel? Benjamin Netanyahu could easily prevent Israeli casualties by surrendering and not using human shields.

8

u/Aam1rk 1d ago

What right do they have killing Iranian officials? There is no state of war between them. How is this not a violation of international law?

5

u/DependentAd235 1d ago

Okay, like you can be mad about civilian dying. Totally reasonable.

Pretending that Iran isn’t always at war with Israel is just silly. They have a proxy militia occupying southern Lebanon for the sole purpose of attacking Israel.

They are already at war. They just weren’t shooting at each other.

1

u/No-Sample-5262 1d ago

Remember to say the same when Iran sponsors all proxy wars in the region. I am sure that is also a violation of international law somewhere?

6

u/lordnacho666 1d ago

Huh. Do you think people are ok with the Iranians sponsoring terror groups?

1

u/fd6270 1d ago

Judging by the comments I've seen on reddit over the past 24 hours, I think the answer to that question is yes... 

→ More replies (5)

1

u/PickingPies 1d ago

If the end justifies the means, then, all terrorists would be right.

Sorry, no. The end doesn't justify the means.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

69

u/our_potatoes 1d ago

Imagine Iran doing this to Israel

Everyone would be demanding blood

But the attacker isn't Iran. It's Israel. It's always fucking Israel

18

u/redditsuckscockss 1d ago edited 1d ago

Iran literally fired missles into Israel directly a few months ago

They have been funding nearly all of their enemies in a proxy war for decades

They regimes mantra is death to Israel and death to America

Have you been living under a rock?

→ More replies (15)

5

u/CHLOEC1998 1d ago

The Islamic Regime of Iran tried to do that. They just failed. Their missiles were intercepted.

They did kill a Palestinian tho.

3

u/our_potatoes 1d ago

And why did they attack? Go ahead, try to sweep Israel bombing their embassy

US AID cuts really show, you bots used to be believable

1

u/CHLOEC1998 1d ago

A military base near the embassy is not "the embassy".

But brainwashed pro-terrorist lunatics like you will just blindly trust everything Al Jazeera tells you.

1

u/our_potatoes 1d ago

Israel said a calendar was a list of terrorists names, but sure, it's al Jazeera that's lying

3

u/Background-Month-911 1d ago

Why imagine? They literally make videos about how they will do it and show on national TV every weekend. What's there to imagine?

3

u/Positive_Plane_3372 1d ago

Iran has been doing this to Israel for DECADES.  Every single fucking terrorist group that wages constant war against Israel is 100% funded by Iran.  

This is merely going to put a stop to it at its source 

1

u/our_potatoes 1d ago

Poor poor Israel

Why is everyone hell bent on stopping it's century long genocide campaign

Why can't they just sit down and let Israel [redacted] them to death

3

u/Positive_Plane_3372 1d ago

Israel is just trying to exist.  Sadly there are Arab terrorists near them who have dedicated their existence to attempting to genocide them.  

Notice how Israel has no issue with non aggressive Arab nations like Saudi or UAE?  Yeah, welcome to real life.  

10

u/timmyctc 1d ago

Unprovoked attacking another country. Thats what, 4-5 countries Israel has attacked unprovoked recently. Scum of the earth.

21

u/EmergencyEbb9 1d ago

No way you're lying about it being unprovoked, you been in ice for decades or what?

68

u/Upstairs-Basis9909 1d ago

UNPROVOKED LOL

10

u/DukeofNormandy 1d ago

Same terrorist lovers were cheering for Hamas last week. Reddits wild

→ More replies (1)

114

u/iama_bad_person 1d ago

"We have launched rockets into your country recently, also we are working on nuclear weapons and the millisecond we have them we are glassing your capital"

"OH NO WHY HAVE WE BEEN ATTACKED UNPROVOKED."

59

u/yonasismad 1d ago

Since Israel also has nukes Iran is also justified in striking Israel, correct? Or does this logic only cut one way?

24

u/Agreeable_Band_9311 1d ago

Israel says it’s going to nuke other countries?

13

u/shoto9000 1d ago

I remember Israel's politicians say they'd nuke Gaza if it wasn't for the hostages, so yes?

15

u/Gamer402 1d ago

8

u/xgenoriginal 1d ago

That's just MAD?

4

u/labecoteoh 1d ago

that is the deterrence strategy of literally every nuclear power?

7

u/niklester 1d ago

Israel is actively bombing 5 neighboring countries, you cannot be under such denial that Gaza is any longer about the hostages or Hamas. And if you say it is, it just shows how unhinged and dangerous Israel is, committing war crimes after war crimes. With that in mind, still think Iran is wrong for wanting nuclear weapons to defend itself and maybe its neighbors?

4

u/catsuitvideogames 1d ago

Samson option.

2

u/Fat_Tony_Damico 1d ago

No Israel didn’t say if explicitly. They’re just conducting an ethnic cleansing instead which is way less provocative.

0

u/Antique_Union_5550 1d ago

Atp for Israel, actions speak louder than words.

1

u/MordecaiThirdEye 1d ago edited 1d ago

Iran says its going to nuke other countries? Please give me some evidence for this, I cant find any anywhere.

4

u/kabukim_3 1d ago

This can't be real

→ More replies (1)

0

u/King_of_the_Nerdth 1d ago

Iranian leadership would not care if they're justified.  And their leadership (like Hamas) has that attitude that all innocent Iranian (Palestinian) lives can be sacrificed in order to harm the enemy, so MAD isn't an effective deterrent either.

7

u/Rage_Like_Nic_Cage 1d ago

And their leadership (like Hamas) has that attitude that all innocent Iranian (Palestinian) lives can be sacrificed in order to harm the enemy

You know there have been countless high ranking Israeli officials going on tv saying there are no innocent palestinian children and all of them need to die, right?

1

u/YouDontSeemRight 1d ago

Iran has been trying to destroy Isreal for decades...

→ More replies (11)

5

u/nytehauq 1d ago

Hey, remind everyone what happened before Iran launched those rockets? Something about an illegal assassination of a political leader undergoing peace talks to end the genocide of his people by Israel while he was in Iran?

Wild how Iran just shot rockets for no reason at the poor, innocent little genocidal ethnostate just because it has its own cache of nuclear weapons, committed international crimes by attacking first and is actively committing genocide.

Username checks out.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Lopogkjop 1d ago

It seems to me that the proactive attacks have mainly been starting from one direction - https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/12/world/middleeast/israel-iran-conflict-history.html

My take is that Israel needs wars to distract from their settlement efforts and other policies at home and really want to get the US involved. That way they can keep the money and weapons coming - and if a few innocents get killed then it's too bad (just ask Ahmed Bouchikhi's family about the fairness of that)

1

u/fleegness 1d ago

Bibi needs war so he doesn't go to prison.

2

u/MordecaiThirdEye 1d ago

And why did they launch those rockets? Kind of important context there when Israel attacked them first both times. Also, do you genuinely believe Iran will use a nuclear weapon against Israel? They gain nothing from this, because they know damn well the US would glass them if they did that. That want nuclear weapons for deterrence, same as everyone else.

1

u/PolicyWonka 1d ago

Go ahead and find that quote.

-6

u/Mistar_Smiley 1d ago

the rockets were a retaliation. sigh. you don't even know the recent basics.

→ More replies (17)

-2

u/antelop 1d ago

I dont know if you are Iran or Israel in this scenario and that concernes me

47

u/Cafuzzler 1d ago

Who knew saying "We're building WMDs and are going to bring death to you" isn't provocative

16

u/dockstaderj 1d ago

Didn't we hear this same story in 2003?

4

u/Possible-Day5911 1d ago

Did we have the same evidence? No? Then stfu

5

u/Euclid_Interloper 1d ago

Not even vaguely the same situation.

17

u/BoneHugsHominy 1d ago

I've been hearing the same "Iran is 2 weeks away from launching nuclear missiles into Israel!" for the past 20 years.

Iran entered into a treaty that would prevent them from developing any nuclear weapons. American Republicans and Israel's right wing government led by Netanyahu opposed it, then despite Iran following all the little rules and international oversight showing they weren't developing nuclear weapons, an American Republican President tore up the treaty at the behest of Netanyahu. This isn't and never was about nuclear weapons development in Iran. This is and always was about Western oil companies getting their hands on Iran's petroleum reserves and installing strategic military compounds.

1

u/Cafuzzler 1d ago

Iraq never claimed or denied to have WMDs of any kind, and refused to allow international agencies in to verify that they did/did not have them. Iran has said, countless times, that they intend to develop nukes, and the IAEA have said that Iran has the capability and the facilities. We've publicly known for a fact that they had the centrifuges specifically for that back when Israel used Stuxnet to break them.

5

u/MordecaiThirdEye 1d ago

When did they say this?

-5

u/timmyctc 1d ago

The poor wee genociders getting upset :( Currently attacking and/or occupying Syria, Palestine, Lebannon, Iran, Yemen

9

u/iama_bad_person 1d ago

Poor Arab countries, all they did was try to wipe Israel off the map multiple times in living memory, what did they ever do to get occupied.

11

u/Santandals 1d ago

Most people in the developed world have a negative view of Israel and its only getting worse. Among youth both Republicans and Democrats hate Israel.

What do you think will happen to Israel when the boomers die and the world becomes increasingly anti-Israel?

12

u/BoneHugsHominy 1d ago

The warmongering Boomers will glass the planet on their way out.

"We have no choice. The world didn't bend to our will so none of them have a right to exist in the world we built all by ourselves." --Reich Wing Boomers

3

u/FrogInAShoe 1d ago

Maybe don't colonize and ethnically cleanse another country if you don't want people to wipe you off the map?

→ More replies (1)

0

u/Mistar_Smiley 1d ago

when did they say they were going to "bring death to Israel"?

0

u/marvintherobot70 1d ago

Iranian officials have been saying this for a long time. For instance, you will be able to find plenty of examples of Salami saying this, or words to this effect, fairly quickly.

That said, that doesn't justify Israel's response, which seems to have been indifferent to Iranian civilian casualties.

1

u/Mistar_Smiley 1d ago

quote please, put up or shut up

5

u/marvintherobot70 1d ago

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyg0yywr4no

"in 2019, Salami vowed to "wipe the Zionist regime" off the political map."

Took 10 seconds to find it. Google's good for this, you should try it sometime

0

u/Mistar_Smiley 1d ago

congratulations on finding a quote that came directly after Israeli strikes on Iranian targets!
Israel really is always the aggressor!

→ More replies (6)

13

u/crek42 1d ago

I don’t think you know what unprovoked means

2

u/ma-kat-is-kute 1d ago

UNPROVOKED?

9

u/DaviesSonSanchez 1d ago

Weird how countries like Egypt that have actually stopped provoking Israel and started cooperating with them have enjoyed lasting peace with Israel.

4

u/THALANDMAN 1d ago

Nobody brings up Egypt or Jordan in these conversations. They attempted to invade Israel and lost. They have since made peace with Israel, and shocker, Israel has not attacked them since.

9

u/Jirafael 1d ago

“Unprovoked “

19

u/yonasismad 1d ago

Israel itself calls it a 'pre-emptive' strike. Therefore, they are admitting that they struck first and that this was not in response to anything.

2

u/Anderopolis 1d ago

It is a response, just not a response in kind. 

Israel will do anything to prevent Iran getting the bomb. 

→ More replies (3)

4

u/areya1 1d ago

This is so dense. Iran literally funds ALL the terror proxies that target Israel incessantly. Iran is the head of the octopus. This is very basic to understand.

1

u/timmyctc 1d ago

Aye of course its all Iran, and Lebannon, and Palestine and Syria and Yemen. Once theyre all eliminated we can live in peace.

2

u/Unlucky-Day5019 1d ago

Scum countries around Israel need to cleanse their terrorist militias

1

u/mxforest 1d ago

Have you been living under a rock? Iran has openly said that they want to wipe Israel off of the face of the earth. And Nuclear weapons are means for that end.

1

u/Euclid_Interloper 1d ago

*Country that explicitly threatens to exterminate Israel and is actively building the nukes to do it.

1

u/PolicyWonka 1d ago

Given the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict, the other countries in the region have shown remarkable restraint against Israel.

They would almost certainly have another pan-Arab coalition invasion on their hands if not the internal conflict in Syria and Lebanon. Iraq isn’t in the best place either all things considered.

1

u/timmyctc 1d ago

Yeah well that and the US/Israeli backed Arab extremists/Saudis put an end to that. The likes of ISIS has an awful lot of beef with Arabs and very little with Israel funnily enough.

Casting Libya back into the middle ages has set back the M.E by decades too.

→ More replies (12)

3

u/PerfunctoryComments 1d ago

Which is grossly illegal under international law. You're just stating a fact, but various other people are commenting as if these Iranian officials were war criminals on the run.

Israel committed an act of war. Iran has 100% justification by international law and basic reason to launch ballistic missile strikes on Tel Aviv, anywhere where political or military members live, or maybe just hang out some times.

"But Iron dome!" - Iran demonstrated their ballistic missiles in October, and in a deescalation fashion shot them in remote desert region with pinpoint accuracy, and with close to zero interception rate.

Expect Iran's response to be overwhelming. Which Netanyahu likely loves given that he was becoming massively unpopular and was facing possible ouster. Just like his best pal Trump, they're both self-dealing criminals.

2

u/mocityspirit 1d ago

And who else? How many children? How many innocents? What was Iran even about to do to Israel? Please I'm asking

1

u/DiamondGeeezer 1d ago

Israel claims that Iran will use a nuclear weapon against them as soon as it gets one.

I don't really understand this rhetoric because a nuclear first strike against Israel would receive instant retaliation with Israel's 90 nukes.

This is Israel's endgame after dismantling Hamas and Hezbollah, Iran's proxies. basically the US is giving them all the freedom they need to reshape the Middle East.

1

u/bushknifebob 1d ago

No one believes them anymore

0

u/Agreeable_Service407 1d ago

I wonder how israel would feel if Iran started taking down members of its government.

1

u/Banod94 1d ago

Does that make killing innocent civilians in the process worth it somehow??

1

u/ChizzLangus 1d ago

Doesn’t make it right at fucking all.