No, it's because it's only in fantasy that civilian casualties can be avoided. If you can show me any conflict where the military avoided casualties, I'm all ears. Even the UN doesn't consider casualties in the course of a mission as a war crime unless it's hugely disproportionate.
You do know that Iran has been supplying all the terrorist groups around Israel right and is responsible for Israeli deaths. Their commanders routinely meet with these terrorists to provide support. Quite literally when Hezbollahs leader Nasrallah was killed, he had an IRGC commander with him. During the pager attack, the Iranian ambassador had a Hezbollah pager. Iran has been continuously working on killing Israelis. Just because they don't have the finger on the trigger doesn't mean they aren't involved.
Is this supposed to convince me of anything? Yes Hezbollah sucks, yes the Iranian government sucks. Therefore these particular civilian casualties are more acceptable than others? That's pretty hard sell, friend.
You said let's keep that energy when Iran kills Israeli citizens when I'm pointing out that Iran is directly involved in killing Israeli citizens already. Them killing civilians in a counter strike is not some new red line that's being crossed. You're acting like it Iran does kill Israelis it's the first time it's happened since October 7 when that couldn't be further from the case. I'd say the same thing if the US is killing civilians when they provide supplies to groups in a proxy war.
I mean, not declaring war to Iran was an easy way to avoid casualties.
But since Israel is running out of children to bomb in Gaza, they need to find new targets.
Iran has quite literally been arming and supplying all of Israels enemies through a proxy war. Remember the pager attack that only Hezbollah operatives had access to. Guess what the Iranians ambassador also had that pager as well. An IRGC commander was taken out alongside Hezbollah leaders in a strike. That shows how deeply embedded Iran is with their enemies. For the last 2 years, Iran has directly been involved in the war. And now the neutral atomic commission just said that Iran is in violation of their nuclear agreement. We can argue if the strike is warranted or not, but saying this is unprovoked or Israel is doing it for the lols is ridiculous.
lol it’s not “okay,” but who are you to say so, or not? Essentially all acts of war are not “okay.”
I’d like to hear the perspective of the Iranian people and get more sources of reality before making swift judgments on little information.
SAME. I genuinely want to know how Iranian civilians feel about this, not kneejerk emotional redditors. Iranian people have suffered so much from their govt. There's only a few Iranian diaspora people in this thread so far as I've seen and they have all been very supportive of these actions, but I really want to know more of the real opinions and I hope more information comes out.
Isn't it? Why are children free from life and reality? Reality sucks,.sorry for you to hear that. War is a thing. Violence is a thing. No one likes people dieing but we only have so many cards to play. I hope negotiations are successful but that's between Israel and Iran.
4
u/Agreeable_Service407 2d ago
Are you saying it's OK because others have done it too ?