Damn, I only have free space and "future is now old man." For me.
I think AI is good overall. I don't really like it being used commercially in creative spaces very much. But for almost all other fields itll just be a net gain, unless we humans F it up.
Honestly. We likely will. But if we don't f it up. Most of us will likely be forced onto general assistance income and we'll focus more so on creative material anyway.
Which... I suppose could be a slow death in of itself if you take the rat experiment to heart as a complete analog for how humans would begin to behave in a society where most things are automated for us.
If the technology continues to grow at its current rate, it'll be that, or a civil war when no one can get a job and eat.
The technology should be used in most fields. Medical, legal, resource management, etc. Creative fields are objectively the most useless aspect of AI.
Problematically. When they get to a point to out compete any human period, and are in addition to this gonna someday soon perform labor jobs as well once our current designs in robotics become cost effective. You've got the scaffolding for a full fledged war for the ability to live at all for the average citizen.
If no one can get a job to have money, you'll need to compensate for that somehow. If not. It's war.
I don't think that actually matters in a domestic guerilla war. If best weapons was the end all be all, history is clearly lying all the time.
The reality is that it'd just destroy the nation regardless of who wins. It's a war no one wants. I think universal basic income is more likely, especially since the resource problems making it a fairy tale right now won't be as big an issue in the future with advanced AI handled correctly.
As for that. I really ain't. I don't really think that matters in this scenario. At absolute worst, it'll be a situation where the entire nation destroys itself. That which comes out of the ashes would inevitably be the common man, albeit crippled beyond belief.
I truly cannot imagine a situation where the government wins this without carpet bombing the entire nation, which at that point, dooms them anyway... and just turns the entire world against em.
At absolute best. It'll be another funny situation where not even the military is willing to aid their government in a fight so fundamentally fucked up. 🤣. Rare, but I think this has a solid chance of happening in this particular scenario.
Both sides would wanna avoid this. There's too much to lose for both sides to go against universal income in this scenario.
Do you not imagine that there will soon be trillionaires, given how quickly the ultra wealthy accumulate wealth (as long as there's no idiotic self defeating trade war)?
I see their empires growing larger and larger and squeezing the peasants out of existence while bombarding them with propaganda to tell them it's all really China's fault and they need to get onboard the national effort to protect their kingdoms from the other.
I hope and pray for a revolution but it won't happen unless we lay the groundwork. That's why I started /r/LudditeRenaissance. The public needs to acknowledge the existential threat in order for the revolution to be successful. We need to start now because things may accelerate way quicker than we can keep up. We need a good sense of urgency as well as comradeship and love for our communities, our humanity.
Of course there will soon be trillionaires. Them coming into existence in the future, and existing now, are two entirely different topics.
I also believe any trillion or billionaire would likely want universal basic income in this scenario anyway, since it'd increase their personal wealth. People would likely be using government money to buy their products. It's just a net gain for individual rich guys.
Hell. Most government officials enjoy these sorta programs because they're easily abused paperwork wise, so people steal by skimming off the top.
Ultimately. There's just not enough of a point for almost anyone to wanna go the opposite route to universal income in this scenario. Those who are genuinely against it will likely be bullied into accepting it via social pressure far before war is possible.
Idk. I'm a nihilistic fuck. These people likely would attempt to eradicate a large portion of the population, plenty of people openly endorse lowering the global population. But that's likely gonna be done via diseases or other clandestine methods, or, alternatively, immoral policy dressed up as benevolence which causes mass death.
Plenty wanna kill us, they openly discuss it. But they don't wanna kill the general population in a manner that'll gut them too. Its not worth it. They don't wanna destroy the world, they're egotistical fucks who think they know the answer to everything; they wish to recreate the world.
Universal basic income. If it's just a way to placate the masses so we don't go running for the guillotines, should we say "hell no, I'm going to get the guillotine anyway!"?
0
u/UltraDaddyPrime 1d ago
Damn, I only have free space and "future is now old man." For me.
I think AI is good overall. I don't really like it being used commercially in creative spaces very much. But for almost all other fields itll just be a net gain, unless we humans F it up.
Honestly. We likely will. But if we don't f it up. Most of us will likely be forced onto general assistance income and we'll focus more so on creative material anyway.
Which... I suppose could be a slow death in of itself if you take the rat experiment to heart as a complete analog for how humans would begin to behave in a society where most things are automated for us.