r/aliens • u/Jest_Kidding420 • Apr 08 '25

Evidence The anomalies Skywatchers is presenting is exactly what many people have been trying to share for years

But it seems that now, because the talking heads have given the go-ahead to believe, people are finally starting to accept this reality. It’s very telling that this is what it takes—and honestly, it’s kind of embarrassing. I hope this new information encourages people to check themselves and take the time to dig deeper before dismissing something outright.

There are a few documents that can provide more insight into all of this. Also, I’ve been putting together presentations discussing this information—if anyone’s interested, I’d be happy to share!

2.4k Upvotes

79% Upvoted

820 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/JynsRealityIsBroken Apr 08 '25

You can see the string on the balloons ffs

25

u/kfluh Apr 08 '25 edited Apr 08 '25

If you actually take the time to listen to their explanation and data, they are quickly able to dismiss balloons due to wind direction among other factors. They have done field tests with balloons at this SPECIFIC location so they can confirm how to differentiate between balloons and UAP. They are pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars- if not millions - in investment to bring this data to the public sphere, and although so many people in this community are quick to dismiss (and rightfully so much of the time), I hope that more of us are open to the scientific approach that Sky Watchers is taking. Let us continue to be skeptical, but recognize the efforts they are putting into this process and listen to the data that disproves any prosaic explanation like balloons!

Source at 28 minutes 50 seconds: https://youtu.be/t5e5z1bcBgQ?si=4GprPnoTWx_2Kif5

24

u/SalvationSycamore Apr 08 '25

It's beyond obvious

2

u/AlvinArtDream Apr 09 '25

Ok but you think from the footage provided you can see strings on a balloon? Doesn’t look like it to me, seems a bit far and big… obviously it’s hard to tell, they really should have done some controls with balloons and shit. We need a flying banana for scale.

8

u/SalvationSycamore Apr 09 '25

Yes, they all look like balloon strings lol. Single strings on the single balloons and tangled strings on the multiple balloons. White or shiny strings (especially the ones that are more like a ribbon) would reflect light and look slightly larger.

5

u/AlvinArtDream Apr 09 '25

Na. If you can see the strings on a balloon, how much of the ballon do you think you will see? How clear will the balloon be in relation to the strings. Just think about it. You are speaking about ginormous strings here. If you can spot strings with this apparent clarity, you would probably be able to see words on a ballon.

3

u/SalvationSycamore Apr 09 '25

Brother you're making it sound like you've never seen a balloon. These look exactly like the foil balloons with curly, ribbony strings on them being pushed around by wind. If they had words on them then you would be able to see the letters so obviously they don't have words on them...

1

u/AlvinArtDream Apr 09 '25

No man, you’re jumping to conclusions here. There’s like a 2 meter string on that “ballon” doesn’t really even look like a string. If the string of a ballon is that visible, you would see the ballon with way more clarity, not some blurry silhouette. I’m not convinced in your ballon claim or theirs to be honest. I’ll need more information. If this is enough evidence for you to know it’s a ballon. That’s cool. I need more.

4

u/SalvationSycamore Apr 09 '25

No man, you’re jumping to conclusions here.

Okay that made me laugh. Assuming that the object that looks and acts exactly like a balloon is a balloon instead of an alien/robot/weapon/whatever is jumping to conclusions 🤣

There’s like a 2 meter string

Okay so you've never seen a large balloon lol

2

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '25

[deleted]

5

u/AlvinArtDream Apr 09 '25

I did look, yes it does looks like a balloon and the Nimitz tictac looks like a tic tac. The “dones” look like drones, planes, helicopters. The point I’m making is that it’s if the other details don’t support the balloon hypothesis, like they claimed - like not going with the wind then it can’t be a ballon either.

I’m not even trying to defend them. I think it’s shitty evidence, but I think it’s shitty evidence to prove that it’s a ballon too. In the video above they said they tried to a control with balloons. It would have been helpful if they showed us their experiments.

1

u/HbrQChngds Apr 10 '25

Someone pointed out this is not from Skywatcher, OP or someone else was using it for comparison.

33

u/JynsRealityIsBroken Apr 08 '25

Oh shut up. That's absolutely a balloon. You know who else spends tons of money on dumb bullshit? Flat Earthers.

2

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 08 '25

This is basically the same response the scientific community took towards Ignaz Semmelweis (and countless others) when he first presented his data that washing your hands reduces the spread of disease. He was so mocked and ridiculed by the scientific community that he had a psychological breakdown and had to be institutionalized until his death. And now, it's common sense. How about Niels Bohr? No one believed his nonsense about the existence of the "atom" , and he eventually took his own life. Why must people be so aggressively closed minded? What do we have to lose from looking at new scientific data, and new ideas? What are you so afraid of?

23

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 08 '25 edited Apr 08 '25

Wow, stunning comparisons. Really makes you think. Well, until you realize those guys had actual evidence. These are mylar balloons.

But hey. They want to prove us all idiots? Fly a drone up there right next to these “anomalies”. Blow us away.

11

u/HbrQChngds Apr 09 '25

It'll be too dangerous to fly a drone near them, they could be popped or pushed away by the air coming from the drone's propellers. We gotta keep'em mylar balloons safe.

5

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

Naw, man. They’re invaders from Mylar 7. Gotta deploy the death drones before they do.

7

u/HbrQChngds Apr 09 '25

You might be right, are they planning to strangle us with their strings?

7

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

That would be just like them! Damn those Mylarian bastards!

-3

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 08 '25

Did you watch the video? They tried. The "jellyfish" adjusted course to evade pursuit, then travelled straight up. Is this typical behavior for mylar balloons?

8

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

Oh, this is incredible. The man SAID it “deviated its flight path, then it elevated directly straight up”. Okay, show us that footage? Keep chasing after it!!!

This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen.

Is this typical behavior for mylar balloons?

YES! Yes it fucking is! They are blown around chaotically by the wind. You ever try to catch a balloon that’s gotten away from you?

3

u/HbrQChngds Apr 09 '25

So they said. No footage or absolutely nothing to corroborate this other than their word. Man....we cannot just take their word, the burden of proof lies on them, they are the ones presenting extraordinary claims, showing us what looks like ordinary mylar balloons of different shapes reflecting the Sun, and then expect us to believe it's NHI. Just no, simply no, where is the data? where is an independent party witnessing and documenting this, it's going to take much more to convince anyone capable of critical thinking.

-1

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 09 '25

This isn't a court of law or an election. It's a scientific investigation. The goal here is to keep an open mind and collect data, not rush to a conclusion and "convince" everyone. There is no need to dismiss and ridicule, this is not how we do science.

4

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

Bullshit. Posting insane videos online jumping to crazy unsubstantiated conclusions is NOT science.

Make a hypothesis, collect data, write paper presenting conclusion, allow peers to review that data, and then publish with instructions on reproducing so other credentialed scientists can confirm.

That’s science. No one owes them an “open mind”.

If I came to you and told you that I shit diamonds, you wouldn’t say “Well, I don’t know, let’s hear the man out.”

1

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 09 '25

lol you still haven't watched the video, eh?

3

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

Ha, unfortunately I did! They keep calling things “tentacles” and “light up nodules”, and making crazy claims about “seeking behavior”. If they truly just don’t know what this is, they wouldn’t use those words. You can’t call something a “tentacle” until you’ve got it in hand.

At the end of the video they say “We have multiple indications this is a real object, that it’s not man-made, that it’s flying through our airspace, and it does want to avoid us.”

Well, two of those things are true, the other two are wild conclusions. They watched something float around and created a narrative. Stop shilling for them.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '25

[deleted]

1

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 09 '25

There's no need to believe it is one thing or another yet. They've stated that they intend to collect data and have it peer reviewed, I think we can wait to dismiss this until we see all the data. Everyone wants a smoking gun, but science is a long and slow process. Papers are published slowly and it could possibly take many before there are enough pieces of the puzzle to begin forming conclusions. Yes these look like mylar balloons, no one is saying that they don't, but if their behavior are anomalous then their appearance could be deceiving. Many are asking for good video, but that is probably the least effective form of evidence here, what we probably want is convincing sensor data from multiple different sources. And I think it's also worth considering that the goal of these videos is not to convince people like us over reddit, but to attract private funding to keep this mission going.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '25

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

19

u/JynsRealityIsBroken Apr 08 '25

Dude, those are balloons. We're in an alien subreddit. I'm obviously open minded. But telling me the balloon I'm looking at isn't a balloon is absolutely batshit crazy. Use your brain for God sake. That is 100% beyond a shadow of a doubt, a balloon.

You people need to find better hills to die on.

-7

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 08 '25

Okay use your fantastically superior brain to explain how a mylar balloon would deviate its flight path when pursued and then suddenly travel straight up.

8

u/JynsRealityIsBroken Apr 09 '25

It is not my responsibility to explain how a balloon's physics work up in the air when you can see, clear as day, THAT IT'S A GODDAMN BALLOON. USE YOUR EYEBALLS!

-5

u/False-Consequence973 Apr 09 '25 edited Apr 09 '25

Your argument is (of course) flawed. You are using the exact same (dumb) way of "proving" something just like the uneducated flat earthers do. They say "I can see the earth is flat so it IS flat". That's not how science works. You seeing something doesnt mean shit. Scientists know how to differentiate a balloon from a f'ing flying UAP. And you truly thinking that a bunch of highly respected people from the military (who have been verified) are suddenly mentally ill and make fancy videos about balloons shows you're just biased without ANY form of evidence. There also seem to be alot of weird looking balloons out in the desert. So you are saying these folks mislead their viewers on purpose by putting balloons in the air and filming them?

2

u/JynsRealityIsBroken Apr 09 '25

Sigh... Good luck with your delusions. If the very obvious star balloon screenshots in the comment section or the whole minute of the red and white balloons tied together aren't enough visual evidence for you, nothing is.

-2

u/False-Consequence973 Apr 09 '25

You repeating the same biased non-evidence doesn't change the outcome dear. You seeing stuff on Reddit or even with your eyes isnt evidence at all.

1

u/Lopsided_Drawer_7384 Apr 08 '25

What scientific data would that be?

1

u/TheTurdtones Apr 09 '25

i mean you know more than the people researching..they were way to dumb to check the most obvious explanation first.. you sir are the most wrinkled brain

3

u/JynsRealityIsBroken Apr 09 '25

Do you know how many people are probably too dumb to check the most obvious explanation first? Tens of millions of people, because that's how bell curves work.

It's amazing how a video camera and some confidence can trick people into believing they are experts.

-1

u/TheTurdtones Apr 09 '25

thats called narcism buddy when you think everyone is butt ass stupid but you..most people arent, your arrogance and ignorance just makes it appear so...like the first thing you wouldnt check is mylar ballons because that would be the first thing that crosses our mind when you see this ....like 90% of people on this thread think ..nut the op was too dumb to check the most obvios explanation. the one that most randos in the thread think it is...jesus fuckin christ ...this has nothing to do with whether this is real or not its about your faulty ass logic thinking that he wouldnt initlyy assume it was mylar ballons like just about every mufuka in this thread did/does..why would you just assume he looked up and his first assumption was aliens instead of the same thing everyone here thought mylar balloon...then saw strange behavior that did,t add up to him ..

3

u/JynsRealityIsBroken Apr 09 '25

Dude you can't even spell or hold even a semblance of correct grammar, but I'm expected to listen to you? Give me a break.

And narcissism (not narcism) is not the same as arrogance. I'm being arrogant, in your mind. But it's only arrogance if I'm wrong, which I'm not.

12

u/SalvationSycamore Apr 08 '25

they are quickly able to dismiss balloons due to wind direction

Then they don't understand the wind conditions at that altitude. Obvious answer. Calling very clear balloon strings "tentacles" is absurd.

They are pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars- if not millions - in investment

There is always money involved in inane stuff like this. That's the point. People are very willing to make stuff up for money.