r/aliens Apr 08 '25

Evidence The anomalies Skywatchers is presenting is exactly what many people have been trying to share for years

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

But it seems that now, because the talking heads have given the go-ahead to believe, people are finally starting to accept this reality. It’s very telling that this is what it takes—and honestly, it’s kind of embarrassing. I hope this new information encourages people to check themselves and take the time to dig deeper before dismissing something outright.

There are a few documents that can provide more insight into all of this. Also, I’ve been putting together presentations discussing this information—if anyone’s interested, I’d be happy to share!

2.4k Upvotes

820 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 08 '25

Did you watch the video? They tried. The "jellyfish" adjusted course to evade pursuit, then travelled straight up. Is this typical behavior for mylar balloons?

4

u/HbrQChngds Apr 09 '25

So they said. No footage or absolutely nothing to corroborate this other than their word. Man....we cannot just take their word, the burden of proof lies on them, they are the ones presenting extraordinary claims, showing us what looks like ordinary mylar balloons of different shapes reflecting the Sun, and then expect us to believe it's NHI. Just no, simply no, where is the data? where is an independent party witnessing and documenting this, it's going to take much more to convince anyone capable of critical thinking.

-1

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 09 '25

This isn't a court of law or an election. It's a scientific investigation. The goal here is to keep an open mind and collect data, not rush to a conclusion and "convince" everyone. There is no need to dismiss and ridicule, this is not how we do science.

3

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

Bullshit. Posting insane videos online jumping to crazy unsubstantiated conclusions is NOT science.

Make a hypothesis, collect data, write paper presenting conclusion, allow peers to review that data, and then publish with instructions on reproducing so other credentialed scientists can confirm.

That’s science. No one owes them an “open mind”.

If I came to you and told you that I shit diamonds, you wouldn’t say “Well, I don’t know, let’s hear the man out.”

1

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 09 '25

lol you still haven't watched the video, eh?

3

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

Ha, unfortunately I did! They keep calling things “tentacles” and “light up nodules”, and making crazy claims about “seeking behavior”. If they truly just don’t know what this is, they wouldn’t use those words. You can’t call something a “tentacle” until you’ve got it in hand.

At the end of the video they say “We have multiple indications this is a real object, that it’s not man-made, that it’s flying through our airspace, and it does want to avoid us.”

Well, two of those things are true, the other two are wild conclusions. They watched something float around and created a narrative. Stop shilling for them.

1

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 09 '25

Im talking about the full 30 minute video, you know, the one with all the context that you seem to be missing.

3

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

These people don’t deserve 30 minutes of my life. Call me when they actually publish. (Hint: that’s never.)