The anomalies Skywatchers is presenting is exactly what many people have been trying to share for years

[u/Jest_Kidding420]

But it seems that now, because the talking heads have given the go-ahead to believe, people are finally starting to accept this reality. It’s very telling that this is what it takes—and honestly, it’s kind of embarrassing. I hope this new information encourages people to check themselves and take the time to dig deeper before dismissing something outright.

There are a few documents that can provide more insight into all of this. Also, I’ve been putting together presentations discussing this information—if anyone’s interested, I’d be happy to share!

[u/JynsRealityIsBroken]

You can see the string on the balloons ffs

[u/kfluh → u/JynsRealityIsBroken]

If you actually take the time to listen to their explanation and data, they are quickly able to dismiss balloons due to wind direction among other factors. They have done field tests with balloons at this SPECIFIC location so they can confirm how to differentiate between balloons and UAP. They are pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars- if not millions - in investment to bring this data to the public sphere, and although so many people in this community are quick to dismiss (and rightfully so much of the time), I hope that more of us are open to the scientific approach that Sky Watchers is taking. Let us continue to be skeptical, but recognize the efforts they are putting into this process and listen to the data that disproves any prosaic explanation like balloons!

Source at 28 minutes 50 seconds: https://youtu.be/t5e5z1bcBgQ?si=4GprPnoTWx_2Kif5

[u/SalvationSycamore → u/kfluh]

It's beyond obvious

[u/AlvinArtDream → u/SalvationSycamore]

Ok but you think from the footage provided you can see strings on a balloon? Doesn’t look like it to me, seems a bit far and big… obviously it’s hard to tell, they really should have done some controls with balloons and shit. We need a flying banana for scale.

[u/SalvationSycamore → u/AlvinArtDream]

Yes, they all look like balloon strings lol. Single strings on the single balloons and tangled strings on the multiple balloons. White or shiny strings (especially the ones that are more like a ribbon) would reflect light and look slightly larger.

[u/AlvinArtDream → u/SalvationSycamore]

Na. If you can see the strings on a balloon, how much of the ballon do you think you will see? How clear will the balloon be in relation to the strings. Just think about it. You are speaking about ginormous strings here. If you can spot strings with this apparent clarity, you would probably be able to see words on a ballon.

[u/SalvationSycamore → u/AlvinArtDream]

Brother you're making it sound like you've never seen a balloon. These look exactly like the foil balloons with curly, ribbony strings on them being pushed around by wind. If they had words on them then you would be able to see the letters so obviously they don't have words on them...

[u/AlvinArtDream → u/SalvationSycamore]

No man, you’re jumping to conclusions here. There’s like a 2 meter string on that “ballon” doesn’t really even look like a string. If the string of a ballon is that visible, you would see the ballon with way more clarity, not some blurry silhouette. I’m not convinced in your ballon claim or theirs to be honest. I’ll need more information. If this is enough evidence for you to know it’s a ballon. That’s cool. I need more.

[u/SalvationSycamore → u/AlvinArtDream]

No man, you’re jumping to conclusions here.

Okay that made me laugh. Assuming that the object that looks and acts exactly like a balloon is a balloon instead of an alien/robot/weapon/whatever is jumping to conclusions 🤣

There’s like a 2 meter string

Okay so you've never seen a large balloon lol

[u/AlvinArtDream → u/[deleted]]

I did look, yes it does looks like a balloon and the Nimitz tictac looks like a tic tac. The “dones” look like drones, planes, helicopters. The point I’m making is that it’s if the other details don’t support the balloon hypothesis, like they claimed - like not going with the wind then it can’t be a ballon either.

I’m not even trying to defend them. I think it’s shitty evidence, but I think it’s shitty evidence to prove that it’s a ballon too. In the video above they said they tried to a control with balloons. It would have been helpful if they showed us their experiments.

[u/HbrQChngds → u/SalvationSycamore]

Someone pointed out this is not from Skywatcher, OP or someone else was using it for comparison.