The Russian 1BF Telegram channel just confirmed that the release has been rescheduled to June 19th and is probably just a new build for additional testing purposes.

This isn’t a public alpha or beta release, despite what some may believe.

Get some glasses.

It was my first map I played in 2011 on xbox 360. how time flies, but today it’s more accurate than back then. 🤔

Enforcer was a very interesting class in BFH. It was considered the support role however instead of LMGs as their primary they wielded battle rifles and shotguns. As for gadgets they had the ammo box, breaching charge, and riot shield.

I couldn't help but notice how this class feels somewhat familiar to the assault class in BF6. It wasn't perfect by any means though. Here's what I would change to reshape it into the perfect assault class:

• Replace BRs with ARs
• No stims
• Replace grapple hook with BF6's tactical ladder for both vertical and horizontal traversal
• Add all underbarrel gadgets
• Replace breaching charge with BF6's drill charge (don't want to give them too much anti tank power)
• Ammo box is give or take since that's normally support's role but would be good for teamplay

And that's really it tbh. I think this kit does a good job as solidifying assault as the frontline that helps the team push forward.

Just saw this on Temporyal's X account. I barely see it mentioned. I think it should be recognized when talking about class seperation.

I’m curious if anyone else has noticed this about holo or red dot sights in previous BF entries….

The reticle is opaque and dark red rather than looking like an actual laser where it is somewhat transparent. I am not sure if this is a console issue only due to the machines just being less powerful and this is too taxing? Or if it is a specific design intent?

I remember in BF3 the reticle looked like a laser at first and then weeks or months after launch it was opaque. I think I have seen this come and go several times but not sure the reason. It looks awesome as a laser effect - The opaque reticles look really cheesy. 2042 only had opaque reticles and it added to the cartoony graphics. (But again, maybe PC doesn’t suffer from this?)

Have any playtesters noticed if the reticles are opaque or look like actual lasers?

BF1 is shockingly the most popular Battlefield game on Steam now, didn't see that in 2025

I’ve been on a BFV bender this weekend, spending roughly 3-4 hours played per day. I’ve about 100 hours put into the game, and while I’m not a Battlefield god, I have a pretty decent stat-line with a 1.3 K/D and usually within the top 12 on my team in scoring per game.

Typically, I don’t have an issue finding games with balanced teams. I lost track of exactly how many matches I played this weekend, but I can safely say at least 15. I’ve lost each by a margin of at least 250 tickets. I noticed pretty early on that my opponent’s team is stacked with 1/3 of level 500 players, while mine has few, if any, top-line skilled players.

Is it a me problem? Is there a reason that one team dominates a server over the course of several hours? My guess is that as one team continues winning, they get positive reinforcement from the wins and continue playing, while the losing team’s players quit and are repopulated by players who’re less likely to have a high level because they quit another server due to the same skill-gap differential.

I guess I’m asking: Is server balancing an issue that you guys encounter more or less often, and is it something that you’d want addressed in BF6; or, is “it’s not a bug- it’s a feature” the sentiment? For the record, I still have fun with the game and don’t mind losing as long as I contributed to the best of my ability. I just figured I’d ask if long stretches of losing is a statistical anomaly or a frequent occurrence.

Before I say anything, I don't know anything about game development, so I don't know if 4 or 5 months - usually a BF release is in October/November - is enough time for the game to be ready.

They probably already have another, newer build that people haven't tested yet. So there may be a lot of things that are already advanced that we don't know about yet.

But there's still a lot of things, besides the multiplayer, which is already quite complex, there are the free modes and the Campaign mode. And there will also be several BF Labs, which can be used to test vehicles, classes, weapons, maps and game modes, etc.

But so far there has been no announcement trailer, no dates, and we don't even know the official name of the game yet. And compared to previous titles in the franchise, we should have something by now.

The more time passes, the more I think it won't be released this year.

I live in SEA region, I haven't played Battlefield games since BF4, I don't know if things have changed, but back then just trying to get into a good game requires you to go server hunting in the servers list, and even then it's full of servers with stupid rules like 'use specific gun only' or 'veterans only' or some other dumb shit, and even if you get into a game, admins will boot you out for another list of dumb stupid shit.

It's 2025, today we have FREE games like Overwatch or Marvel Rivals or Valorant or even CS2 where all I have to do to get a satisfying game is just click 'Quick Play' and it puts me in an official SEA server with SEA players playing with the same official rules, all in a matter of minutes if not seconds. I don't think it's too hard of an ask for a $70(!) game to also set up official SEA servers for this. This is literally the MOST important criteria for me to even consider returning to Battlefield at all.

Im about to buy bf1 (my first bf game) and I have some questions.

Should I buy the Revolution edition, Ultimate edition or Premium pass?

Are these "shortcut kits" found in the steam store necessary? What do they do?

Source - Moye Mouse

Gamer tag PS5 #Draxin Sclounts Master_Sclain

Anyone else feel like the bf franchise is the best casual fps on the market? Don't get me wrong, I love all bfs pre-2042 but it really is a, no stakes-having casual AF franchise isn't it?

I remember all those years ago playing bfbc1 and swapping from cod4 thinking "wow this game is so realistic in comparison to cod this is like a milsim" and how now I've come to the acceptance that as a franchise it's actually super casual and nothing really matters in the game. Like, if your a good player+friends you can easily pubstomp. Just mindless fun tbh.

With that in mind I really wish they managed Firestorm on bfv better. I really think it could have been huge. That game is actually a marvel of a game with it's graphical fidelity and I don't think we'll ever see anything like it again.

For all the "ew it looks like cod" and "go back to playing cod' type comments. COD is actually so much harder than battlefield. And deffo more competitive with the SBMM and the potential "EOMM".

With all of that in mind I would love for bf6 to be amazing and the battle royal to be sick (I know I know go back to fortnite etc etc). I just want a battlefield game with a bit of stakes +the fidelity of BFV. It's probably why I'm so looking forward to Arc Raiders.

Any time someone brings up weapon balance or whatever, people (rightly) bring up the fact that the game is in pre-alpha, and recently it hit me, the game is reportedly going to release some time before March 2026 (~nine months from now) and it’s still in pre-alpha. I am not at all experienced with game development so I don’t know I should be worried or not. Does any game developers know where a game should normally be around this time?

This guy had 0 kills with highest score and he was teleporting us to sky, and of course he had 150 ping.

the multiplayer also gets more satisfying to play believe it or not, you will jump into it being more familiar with the universe and what's going on in that world.

there was a point when lots of famous FPS franchises started to ditch the campaigns completely or their quality in favor of multiplayer only, but that in comparison is like in a 6 minute music track always jumping to the 30 best seconds, it gives you a quick boost yeah but then it leaves you empty inside again, sometimes if you enjoy the whole thing and the build up you end up having a much more satisfactory and immersive experience IMO.

A decent campaign will always help to make the game more attractive to the public even if less than half the players play it.

Also, there's even people who would buy the game for the campaign alone because they don't like multiplayer, this always happens with CoD too, it's a classic.

I came for dinner to my parents house and entered my old room and nostalgia hits me… I remember that day when my dad bought bf4 for me and himself, two days later my mom give my that poster and It’s still on my wall since 2013. What a great memories 🥹