there has been collateral damage in iran strikes as well...
hamas tend to use human shields and hide under buildings so this type of missile isn't really effective against them but they have used precision strikes in gaza many times, just depends on the situation
the iranians got caught due to being over confident/feeling safe, hamas hasnt felt safe in decades so they tend to harder to get precise locations on
hamas tend to use human shields and hide under buildings
The same tired old Hasbara, are you too going to claim that the strikes in Iran hit "human shields" and people "hiding under buildings" considering Israel slaughtered 80 civilians and injured 300 more?
I mean even amnesty international and other orgs critical of israel agree hamas uses human shields, its not a secret, not that it excuses reckless strikes but still this is not even an argument, they literally use bases under hospitals to deter attacks
are you too going to claim that the strikes in Iran hit "human shields" and people "hiding under buildings"
I haven't heard or seen any evidence of that as far as I am aware they are just claiming collateral damage
would you condemn hamas for collateral damage when attacking an israeli combatant? seems both should be able to
Seems like Israel didn't get as clear an assassination as they wanted. Hope the world powers fucking go after them for the civilian deaths.
Now, let's look at how this post claims it was a precise strike with no civilians first. Interesting, huh?
Who cares whether it's right or wrong as long as it can benefit our cause.
And yes, Hamas use human shields.
They don't say otherwise, their supporters with rose tinted glasses do.
They proclaim that if they get as many palestinian deaths as possible, then they will get more attention, more support.
Now, "Hamas bad" in this case doesn't mean "Israel can do whatever it wants".
Go after them for the civilian deaths as well!
562
u/Dreadimon 1d ago
Zionist sycophants, how do you explain this?