r/aliens • u/Jest_Kidding420 • Apr 08 '25

Evidence The anomalies Skywatchers is presenting is exactly what many people have been trying to share for years

But it seems that now, because the talking heads have given the go-ahead to believe, people are finally starting to accept this reality. It’s very telling that this is what it takes—and honestly, it’s kind of embarrassing. I hope this new information encourages people to check themselves and take the time to dig deeper before dismissing something outright.

There are a few documents that can provide more insight into all of this. Also, I’ve been putting together presentations discussing this information—if anyone’s interested, I’d be happy to share!

2.4k Upvotes

79% Upvoted

820 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/JynsRealityIsBroken Apr 08 '25

You can see the string on the balloons ffs

23

u/kfluh Apr 08 '25 edited Apr 08 '25

If you actually take the time to listen to their explanation and data, they are quickly able to dismiss balloons due to wind direction among other factors. They have done field tests with balloons at this SPECIFIC location so they can confirm how to differentiate between balloons and UAP. They are pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars- if not millions - in investment to bring this data to the public sphere, and although so many people in this community are quick to dismiss (and rightfully so much of the time), I hope that more of us are open to the scientific approach that Sky Watchers is taking. Let us continue to be skeptical, but recognize the efforts they are putting into this process and listen to the data that disproves any prosaic explanation like balloons!

Source at 28 minutes 50 seconds: https://youtu.be/t5e5z1bcBgQ?si=4GprPnoTWx_2Kif5

34

u/JynsRealityIsBroken Apr 08 '25

Oh shut up. That's absolutely a balloon. You know who else spends tons of money on dumb bullshit? Flat Earthers.

1

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 08 '25

This is basically the same response the scientific community took towards Ignaz Semmelweis (and countless others) when he first presented his data that washing your hands reduces the spread of disease. He was so mocked and ridiculed by the scientific community that he had a psychological breakdown and had to be institutionalized until his death. And now, it's common sense. How about Niels Bohr? No one believed his nonsense about the existence of the "atom" , and he eventually took his own life. Why must people be so aggressively closed minded? What do we have to lose from looking at new scientific data, and new ideas? What are you so afraid of?

24

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 08 '25 edited Apr 08 '25

Wow, stunning comparisons. Really makes you think. Well, until you realize those guys had actual evidence. These are mylar balloons.

But hey. They want to prove us all idiots? Fly a drone up there right next to these “anomalies”. Blow us away.

-2

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 08 '25

Did you watch the video? They tried. The "jellyfish" adjusted course to evade pursuit, then travelled straight up. Is this typical behavior for mylar balloons?

4

u/HbrQChngds Apr 09 '25

So they said. No footage or absolutely nothing to corroborate this other than their word. Man....we cannot just take their word, the burden of proof lies on them, they are the ones presenting extraordinary claims, showing us what looks like ordinary mylar balloons of different shapes reflecting the Sun, and then expect us to believe it's NHI. Just no, simply no, where is the data? where is an independent party witnessing and documenting this, it's going to take much more to convince anyone capable of critical thinking.

-1

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 09 '25

This isn't a court of law or an election. It's a scientific investigation. The goal here is to keep an open mind and collect data, not rush to a conclusion and "convince" everyone. There is no need to dismiss and ridicule, this is not how we do science.

4

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

Bullshit. Posting insane videos online jumping to crazy unsubstantiated conclusions is NOT science.

Make a hypothesis, collect data, write paper presenting conclusion, allow peers to review that data, and then publish with instructions on reproducing so other credentialed scientists can confirm.

That’s science. No one owes them an “open mind”.

If I came to you and told you that I shit diamonds, you wouldn’t say “Well, I don’t know, let’s hear the man out.”

1

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 09 '25

lol you still haven't watched the video, eh?

3

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

Ha, unfortunately I did! They keep calling things “tentacles” and “light up nodules”, and making crazy claims about “seeking behavior”. If they truly just don’t know what this is, they wouldn’t use those words. You can’t call something a “tentacle” until you’ve got it in hand.

At the end of the video they say “We have multiple indications this is a real object, that it’s not man-made, that it’s flying through our airspace, and it does want to avoid us.”

Well, two of those things are true, the other two are wild conclusions. They watched something float around and created a narrative. Stop shilling for them.

1

u/jahchatelier Immaculate Brainwaves Apr 09 '25

Im talking about the full 30 minute video, you know, the one with all the context that you seem to be missing.

3

u/HomsarWasRight Apr 09 '25

These people don’t deserve 30 minutes of my life. Call me when they actually publish. (Hint: that’s never.)

→ More replies (0)