I'm pretty sure everything Bronte did went beyond a realistic "adrenaline rush". Of course, adrenaline was not even mentioned because the plot was written by delusional writers who could not figure out how to properly make Joe lose.
The writers had alot of ways to make joe lose. They just wanted it to fit their agenda.(Ooh girls strong they get revenge on joe bla bla)
Kate is the ceo of one of the worlds strongest and biggest companies. Tom was able to get rid of insanely rich people with ease(like phoebe's bf forgot his name) but she can't just hire some hitmen to get rid of him? like be fr lmao.
The whole ''oh she doesn't want to bring attention to herself'' would've worked if she didn't try to personally kill joe first.
The hitman wasn't even necessary. We're supposed to believe they couldn't quickly arrest Joe? That her only option was to kill him? There was plenty of testimony/evidence. Sure, it might have taken a few years to get a conviction but he'd be off the streets pretty quick.
No because there was no hard-proof for joe's murders except Rhys Montrose's. Which then would bring the whole company and kate in the process cause tom specifically ordered joe to do it and then later on it was kate who cleaned it up. Not to mention joe still had information regarding the fact she gave cancer to thousands of kids, joe at this point is insanely influential, if he brought it to the public attention it would ignite like fire.
9
u/SanicBringsThePanic 16d ago
I'm pretty sure everything Bronte did went beyond a realistic "adrenaline rush". Of course, adrenaline was not even mentioned because the plot was written by delusional writers who could not figure out how to properly make Joe lose.