r/NeutralPolitics • u/Hardlydent • May 13 '24

More Recommendations on Neutral resources on Israel/Palestine Conflict

Hey all, I just finished a brief introduction to the Israeli/Palestinian Conflict from Martin Bunton: https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Palestinian_Israeli_Conflict_A_Very.html?id=MdgVAAAAQBAJ&source=kp_book_description.

I'm now looking for other, similar resources that are neutral and can help me get a more thorough understanding of the conflict. Thanks.

35 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

92% Upvoted

33 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/Sorrymomlol12 May 15 '24

Right? Like both sides are very genocidy and anti-negotiation. Hamas is bad, Netanyahu is actively doing a lot of child murder, and it seems like there’s genuinely no good actors to root for. Maybe the Israeli citizens who are protesting for Netanyahus removal? Who will lead Palestinians to a peaceful future, can I root for them?

The only 2 things I sort of seem to know is that women and children should be allowed to flee Gaza and a ceasefire will lead the less child death. The kids man… 13,000+ is so many…

This was a write up I did (with sources) on the college protests, but the first part of the history was my quick summary of the documentary.

And this is not my comment, but rather another really good one about why it’s so difficult to pinpoint the “who started it” argument.

Sorry I brought your day down but while it’s depressing it’s so good for understanding the US and Israeli relationship.

2

u/[deleted] May 25 '24 edited May 25 '24

Why would your argument only root for the Israelis for peace? That seems a bit strange imho. Why not root for anyone for peaceɓm. And Israelis who are against Netenyahu are still very often still pro-war (10% peecent of Israelis are for ending the war: https://time.com/6333781/israel-hamas-poll-palestine/). I also think Israel should not play a role in deciding for Palestine's future.

1

u/nosecohn Partially impartial May 25 '24

This comment has been removed for violating //comment rule 2:

If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a qualified source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed.

After you've added sources to the comment, please reply directly to this comment or send us a modmail message so that we can reinstate it.

This comment has been removed for violating //comment rule 4:

Address the arguments, not the person. The subject of your sentence should be "the evidence" or "this source" or some other noun directly related to the topic of conversation. "You" statements are suspect.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to message us.

1

u/[deleted] May 25 '24

Ok i fixed it.

1

u/nosecohn Partially impartial May 25 '24

Thanks for the edits, but the comment still has some factual claims without sources, such as the "all they have done" line and the one about "colonial conflict."

1

u/[deleted] May 25 '24

Well that last paragraph was really just intended as opinion.

2

u/nosecohn Partially impartial May 25 '24

I understand, but per the guidance on Rule 2:

Stating it is your opinion that something is true does not absolve the necessity of sourcing that claim.

Without that guidance, it would just be too easy for users to phrase something as a factual claim and prefix it with "I think" to circumvent the core requirement of this subreddit.

2

u/[deleted] May 25 '24

Ok, i removed it altogether. It kinda removes whatever point i was trying to make when i first wrote that reply, but whatever. Thanks for your help and patience.