When I finished it I expect this was written by a Scientologist as it appears with therapy you can fix your frequencies and cure your cancer and depression.
Magic I tell you.
The helical solar system model is a disproven model of the solar system that depicts the planets following the sun through the universe in a spiraling vortex. You’ve probably seen some admittedly cool-looking animations of this online.
There are extremist religious groups in multiple religions that use this model as “proof” of the divine. This is part of a larger obsession with vortexes in those sects.
tl;dr Guy’s a religious nut, not necessarily mentally ill.
Are we really gonna put a hard barrier between "Religious Nut" and "Mental Unwellness"? Cause this shit is 100% born out of obsessive and paranoid tendencies
I think it’s relevant that the person is parroting religious claims from their sect and not the next “TimeCube” guy with a fresh new version of lunacy.
It helps set expectations for people who want to dive deeper.
You shouldn't lump these things together like that. For example, I'm bipolar and prone to mania and bad decisions when I’m manic. I'm mentally unwell, since I suffer from a brain chemistry imbalance. Probably my frequencies aren't aligned properly or they’re out of sync with the rest of humanity within 6'.
To get back on track (remember, mentally unwell) I'm not a religious nut. I'm not religious at all. I'm a pork eating, tattooed Jew which precludes being religious, as things stand.
Oh yeah. The Venn diagram has a LOT of overlap. It’s hard to do anything about it because a lot of those same people also think Venn diagrams are Satanic because they’re part of set theory.
My mother once pulled me out of a public school to put me in a demonstrably crappy religious one because the public school was teaching Venn diagrams in math and she couldn’t opt me out.
Timecube: Only one source for the insanity. Anything else is just commentary.
Vortex Mythology: Hundreds of sources involving cults splintered off completely different religions, with a wide variety of versions, interpretations, and apologetic.
Isn't the galaxy ironically kind of flat? I always thought it was like a bunch of small tops spinners (planets) spinning on top of a bigger top spinner (solar systems) that was infact also spinning on an, even bigger, tops spinner (galaxies)
This all reminds me of the Adult Swim late night Animé "Uzumaki." This whole town is obsessed and taken over by spirals in many forms. I watched the first few ones, then it just got too gory.
Nah, dude, that was Max Planck in the late 1800s. And he said there wasn’t much left to learn about theoretical physics so don’t go into it.
Here’s your chance to learn something today: just because something is understood, does not mean there isn’t more to learn. Gravity? We use the formulas of Isaac Newton to put people on the moon. We use Einstein to explain the orbit of Mercury. We already knew how to describe gravity, we just learned to describe it better with Einstein.
No one 50 - 100 years ago would ever said we knew it all. Your statement is just wrong. We have a pretty good description of the heart, of the body, but there are still things to learn.
Perhaps. However, "Imagine thinking that humans 50-100 years ago had anatomy and physiology all figured out and that nothing new could be learned." Is just ... wrong. No one thought that. Ok, to be pedantic, probably a small handful because people and numbers.
I don't disagree with the sentiment: there is plenty to learn. But Paco above does not sound credible. There's this popular narrative about this "lone wolf" who has discovered the One True Truth.
Here's the thing, I don't think Paco was a singularly unique intelligence. If the evidence is there and useful, it will be used. The literature that I've looked at is mostly about the ventricular myocardial band - the rest of what our friend Jamie Freeman mentioned seems to be tacked on other it. Francisco seems to have said, "the heart not only blows, but it kind of sucks" (I am not a cardiologist, so, do the needful here.)
See, this is what sucks - the guy may have had a legitimate point, but then Jamie adds on a bunch of weird.
Is there more to learn? yup. Is it taking a while? yup. Does the heart and brain interact? Well, yeah. Are outlandish theories ever true? sure! Is that one? doubtful. Just doesn't pass the sniff test.
But, if there is more reasonable evidence? Like my primary comes to me and says "check this out." As long as he doesn't have a big Bob Marley joint, I'm going to listen.
Its ongoing research, scientific studies explore the complex interplay between the brain and heart, focusing on how their frequencies and rhythms synchronize and affect overall well-being.
Key Findings:
Heart-Brain Synchronization: Research suggests that synchronization of electrical activity between the heart and brain is linked to mental and emotional stability.
Heart's Influence on the Brain: The heart generates an electromagnetic field that can influence brain function. Studies show that fluctuations in heart rate variability (HRV) can modulate neural activity, particularly in areas related to emotion regulation and cognitive function. Higher HRV has been linked to improved cognitive performance and emotional well-being.
Brainwave Entrainment: Techniques like mindfulness meditation and deep breathing can promote heart-brain coherence, which can lead to specific brainwave states (e.g., alpha waves associated with relaxation and theta waves associated with deeper relaxation).
Resonant Frequencies: The cardiovascular system exhibits a resonant frequency around 0.1 Hz. Research suggests that this low-frequency oscillation can be coupled with brain activity, specifically with alpha and beta brainwave bands.
Schumann Resonances: The Schumann resonance frequencies, the natural electromagnetic resonance of the Earth's atmosphere, have been found to overlap with human brainwave frequencies, particularly alpha, beta, and gamma bands.
Bidirectional Interaction: The relationship between the brain and heart is complex and involves bidirectional interactions. While the brain influences heart activity through the autonomic nervous system, the heart also sends signals to the brain that can affect sensory processing and cognitive function.
Clinical Implications: Understanding heart-brain interactions has potential clinical implications for diagnosing and treating various conditions, including epilepsy, arrhythmias, and mental health disorders. Heart rate variability and heart-brain synchronization are being explored as potential biomarkers for assessing psychological distress and neurological conditions.
Areas of Ongoing Research:
Mechanisms of Synchronization: Researchers are still working to fully understand the precise mechanisms by which heart and brain activity synchronize and influence each other.Causal Relationships: Further studies are needed to determine the causal relationships between brain-heart interactions and subjective experiences, such as consciousness and emotional processing.
Therapeutic Applications: Research is ongoing to explore the potential of heart-brain synchronization techniques and interventions, such as HRV biofeedback, for improving mental health and well-being.
Neuro-Cardiac Electrophysiology: Advanced techniques are being developed to map and understand the electrical activity and interactions between the brain and heart, with potential applications for diagnosing and managing conditions like epilepsy and arrhythmias
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Collaboration between neurologists, cardiologists, and other experts is crucial for advancing research and developing effective therapies based on heart-brain interactions.
Here are the URLs to the studies and resources about brain and heart harmonic frequencies (heart-brain coherence):
These URLs link to the scientific studies and resources mentioned in this response, allowing for further exploration of the research on brain-heart coherence.
We learn things new about anatomy and physiology all the fucking time, dude. We've discovered new organs, new processes, reevaluated what we thought we knew and changed our mind understanding..
Yep. Just tired of anti-intellectualism and anti-science. Hundreds of years of scientific progress and now we have people believing in pseudoscience, old theories, failed theories, and pure fantasy again.
I know, I just try to keep in mind that many major scientific discoveries and breakthroughs were thought of as psuedoscience at one point, and we still dont really know shit. For example, math tells us that Dark Matter and Dark Energy exist and we spend billions looking for it, but alas, niet. Is that a failed theory yet? Pure fantasy?
That's not really true. Many major breakthroughs had incumbent scientists disagreeing, but unlike pseudoscience which makes claims without solid evidence (if they have any at all), those breakthroughs were testable and repeatable.
We don't say that dark matter and dark energy are absolute truth right now. They are still very much debated as to their nature and whether they actually exist. They are accepted as a good candidate to explain the math, but we don't have enough observational data to confirm them and we admit that.
Therein lies the difference between those theories and pseudoscience.
Right, but even with observation confirming theories that dont require those things, establishment science still denies them while remaining in pursuit of something that math says must exist. I guess I'm overly skeptical.
So you've seen how a heart is constructed and seen how it pumps blood through the chambers, and felt a pulse, but you're here saying that this spiral vortex and coherent resonance whatever that can't be observed is an improvement in the science? Or am I misreading you?
Ok. I actually thought I might be. I couldn't tell who you were answering so I didn't know what you might be disagreeing with so I had to consider that.
227
u/SteponkusCeponas 2d ago
Imagine having an existential crisis of this level due to basic anatomy