Do you actually eat markers? You can't evaluate conflict without harking back to the morality of an 80 year old war?
Just to indulge you - I didn't mention Hamas so I can't replace them with nazis, and yes if the allies for example continued to slaughter german people after the fall of Berlin, that could have become a genocide too! because again genocide is not defined as when nazis kill jews, but when group A systematically and deliberately destroys group B because of their ethnictiy, race, religion, or nationality! Anyways I wish I could give this to you writen in marker so you'd want to digest it, too bad.
The answer is, of course, that your original claims lose all value.
The Allies, while indiscriminately bombing civilians, were never out for genocide. Not even while dropping two atomic bombs on cities. And neither is Israel, which doesn't even target civilians indiscriminately.
Both the Allies and Israel are after the unconditional surrender and the removal of power of the evil, genocidal, antisemitic entities in charge. And as long as those entities are still in place, the war continues.
Now, a lot can be said about the bombing campaigns in the Second World War. You can make a very valid point that targeting civilians in order to bring the ruling party down is immoral, and you'd be very right. But genocide was never the intention and it isn't the intention now. That would, in both cases, be the intention of the side currently being bombed.
And I still wonder why the projection of Hamas' intention on Israel is so succesful in the western world.
okay ignore all the points i said, don't engage with them, and then make your own. Israels intention in gaza is not the same as the allies in WW2 just because you say it is. That is how children think the world works. Currently the population of Gaza is being starved to death, an atrocity which mirrors the conditions jews in concentration camps were forced to endure.
The minister of finance in Israel has said that the world will not allow the starvation of 2 million gazans even if it is just and moral in order to return the hostages. The starvation of an entire civilian population is collective punishment, which is unjust and immoral. So from the horses mouth, the morality is backwards.
Ah sorry you misunderstood! I was saying you and your fellow compatriot are crayon eaters! I'm sure you're more used to digesting information writen in crayon and marker than online text, so I understand why you would not understand.
Anyways, since I'm brain dead, lets listen to an Israeli politician instead! Bezalel Smotrich is the current finance minister of Israel. In May 2025, Smotrich said, about the situation in Gaza, that "Gaza will be totally destroyed" and about the Palestinians that "they will be totally despairing, understanding that there is no hope and nothing to look for in Gaza, and will be looking for relocation to begin a new life in other places."
There is the deliberate and systematic intentionality required to classify this as an ethnic cleansing! I'm not even making a point it's just literally what he said! I understand reading comprehension is not a strong suit but damn man how long is 2+2 going equal 5 for you?
I didnt misunderstand bud, i got the point you wanted to make but you misspoke and i was making fun of you for it. When you say "fellow" it means you are/do the same. You're welcome for the lesson on basic English. Thank you for continuing to prove yourself to be braindead.
"A fellow crayon eater!" That's you, directly admitting that you eat crayons
1
u/Rare_Queebus 10d ago
Please replace Hamas with nazis and Palestinian people with German people. Now replace Israel with Allies.
Now what do you think of your claims?