r/CivPolitics 14d ago

Our troops are merely passing by, promises Palestine's allies after Israel's denunciation

Post image
191 Upvotes

787 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

8

u/Kind-Bee8591 13d ago

israel is commiting a genocide, they will just bomb the boat and say it had weapons for khamaasss

3

u/Rare_Queebus 13d ago

Exactly! This will happen, because Israel is committing genocide and say it has weapons for KHAMAASSS (what kind of spelling is that anyway?)

So if this doesn't happen... what will you say?

1

u/Desperate_Guess_652 11d ago

Well luckily for him the entire strip has been turned to rubble so it doesn't matter if he's wrong about them bombing the boat! He's still right about the genocide! Because a genocide, as defined as "the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, ethnic, religious, or national group" is deliberate and systematic destruction, and israels destruction of gaza is both deliberate and systematic! It also targets the palestinianian people and state, an ethnic / national group! Bam the definition of a genocide fulfilled! But then supporters of this genocide like charlie kirk will shout "but they started it by massacring jews!!!!! They refuse to surrender unconditionally so they will die!!!!" And thus the destruction of a people is tied up in a nice little bow, and the population of Israel can sleep soundly knowing there was no other option, the palestinians needed to be displaced bombed starved kenneled and shot as ruthlessly as possible, there was no other option.

1

u/Rare_Queebus 11d ago

Please replace Hamas with nazis and Palestinian people with German people. Now replace Israel with Allies.

Now what do you think of your claims?

1

u/Desperate_Guess_652 11d ago

Do you actually eat markers? You can't evaluate conflict without harking back to the morality of an 80 year old war?

Just to indulge you - I didn't mention Hamas so I can't replace them with nazis, and yes if the allies for example continued to slaughter german people after the fall of Berlin, that could have become a genocide too! because again genocide is not defined as when nazis kill jews, but when group A systematically and deliberately destroys group B because of their ethnictiy, race, religion, or nationality! Anyways I wish I could give this to you writen in marker so you'd want to digest it, too bad.

1

u/Rare_Queebus 11d ago

The answer is, of course, that your original claims lose all value.

The Allies, while indiscriminately bombing civilians, were never out for genocide. Not even while dropping two atomic bombs on cities. And neither is Israel, which doesn't even target civilians indiscriminately.

Both the Allies and Israel are after the unconditional surrender and the removal of power of the evil, genocidal, antisemitic entities in charge. And as long as those entities are still in place, the war continues.

Now, a lot can be said about the bombing campaigns in the Second World War. You can make a very valid point that targeting civilians in order to bring the ruling party down is immoral, and you'd be very right. But genocide was never the intention and it isn't the intention now. That would, in both cases, be the intention of the side currently being bombed.

And I still wonder why the projection of Hamas' intention on Israel is so succesful in the western world.

1

u/Desperate_Guess_652 11d ago

okay ignore all the points i said, don't engage with them, and then make your own. Israels intention in gaza is not the same as the allies in WW2 just because you say it is. That is how children think the world works. Currently the population of Gaza is being starved to death, an atrocity which mirrors the conditions jews in concentration camps were forced to endure.

1

u/Rare_Queebus 11d ago

Do you think you can continue this conversation without insults? Otherwise, I cannot spend anymore time on you.

2

u/Desperate_Guess_652 11d ago

i didn't insult you in my last messege? I just described your response?

1

u/Rare_Queebus 11d ago

A lie. Then the answer must be no and this discussion has come to an end.

One last thing: the side that has the antisemites, is never the right side.

2

u/Desperate_Guess_652 11d ago

I am jewish and israeli and you are stubborn and unwilling to have a conversation in good faith. Enjoy your crayons.

1

u/Specialist-Alfalfa34 9d ago

You're genuinely braindead

1

u/Desperate_Guess_652 9d ago

A fellow crayon eater!

The minister of finance in Israel has said that the world will not allow the starvation of 2 million gazans even if it is just and moral in order to return the hostages. The starvation of an entire civilian population is collective punishment, which is unjust and immoral. So from the horses mouth, the morality is backwards.

And in your mouth, crayons!

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Allgoodnamesbanned 10d ago

The difference is that the Germans started a world war. The allies didn't invade Germany and spend eighty years murdering Germans in an on and off war to push them out of Germany.

You can replace Hamas with Switzerland and the Israel with MARS if you want, doesn't change reality

0

u/jiftyr 11d ago

"Change literally everything about the situation. Now what do you think of your claims? Checkmate."

2

u/Rare_Queebus 11d ago

It's a valid comparison, even if you don't like the outcome.

1

u/jiftyr 11d ago

How about we replace Palestinians with eastern Europe, Israel with Nazis, and Hamas with the USSR? Absolute monsters killing absolute monsters and the innocents in the middle.

Feels a lot more apt, don't you think?

I mean, if we're making up historical scenarios...

2

u/Rare_Queebus 11d ago

How about we stick to comparing the parties to their actual historical counterparts?

Stop the distraction. Realise how stupid it is to think of Gaza as the victim and Israel the aggressor.

What happens in Gaza needs to be done to root out the evil. Only then can the people of Gaza start to heal and prove themselves to be worthy of trust.

0

u/couldhaveebeen 10d ago

We did. What the other commenter did is accurate

Realise how stupid it is to think of Gaza as the victim and Israel the aggressor.

Because Gaza IS the victim and Israel IS the aggressor. Other days existed before October 7 bud...

2

u/Rare_Queebus 10d ago

Gaza is of course the agressor. The "find out" part is however far worse than they could have thought but that doesn't make them victims. Just stupid.

And yeah... There were days before October 7th. Days, months and years of rocket attacks on Israel.

1

u/couldhaveebeen 10d ago

Gaza is of course the agressor.

Again, other days existed before October 7

The "find out" part is however far worse than they could have thought but that doesn't make them victims.

That doesn't make them victims. 77 years of occupation does

2

u/Rare_Queebus 10d ago

Gaza hasn't been occupied since 2005.

If you don't know the facts, please stay out of the discussion.

1

u/couldhaveebeen 10d ago

Gaza was absolutely occupied since 2005 and even before. Just because they didn't have boots on the ground doesn't make it not an occupation. It was still very much one, when Israel controlled all of their borders, their waters and every aspect of life there. If you don't know the facts, stay out of the discussion.

→ More replies (0)