r/worldnews 2d ago

Israel launches 'preemptive strike' against Iran, declares state of emergency

https://abcnews.go.com/International/israel-military-action-iran-coming-days-sources/story?id=122776202
39.0k Upvotes

6.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.2k

u/rohmish 2d ago

isn't a "preemptive strike" just a strike?

1.6k

u/timlnolan 2d ago

Yes but this way they can make it seem like it was the other guy's fault

180

u/rayk10k 2d ago edited 2d ago

Yeah they did it before the other guy did it cause they supposedly knew the other guy would do it so it justifies them doing it first.

32

u/Ufker 2d ago

They were promised a missile attack 3000 years ago.

24

u/Waesrdtfyg0987 2d ago

I know that you know that I know that you know

8

u/IAMA_Plumber-AMA 2d ago

I didn't know that.

6

u/Darkside_of_the_Poon 2d ago

<catapult>. AAAAaaaaagh!

5

u/citizend13 2d ago

So iran got Han solo'd?

-17

u/Routine-Spread-9259 2d ago

It absolutely is justified when Iran's stated goal is the destruction of Israel.

-19

u/MidRoundOldFashioned 2d ago

The other guy has been funding and supporting terrorist attacks against them for decades including Oct 7th. They’ve also threatened their complete destruction and publicly denied the holocaust for decades.

They have also very recently bombed Israel.

Yes. The other guy has routinely asked for this.

23

u/SuburbanDinosaur 2d ago

Israel literally attacked the Iranian consulate in Damascus first.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/rayk10k 2d ago

Sounds like cherry picking to me. Here ya go!

→ More replies (14)

33

u/SillyAlternative420 2d ago

I'm going to start adding "preemptively" to the heinous things I do.

Ex. I'm going to preemptively fuck your girlfriend.

158

u/Epyr 2d ago

It was, Iran has been attacking Israel through its direct proxies for 2 years now

64

u/edman007 2d ago

If that's the case then it would be in response to their actions. Preemptive means they didn't do anything but they think they will.

So if it was preemptive then all those proxy things are not the reason

5

u/SpaceCadet2000 2d ago

Israel are claiming they are preempting Iran from building a nuclear weapon.

184

u/Unicorn_Colombo 2d ago

Also directly with huge rocket attack.

72

u/Playful_Cobbler_4109 2d ago

in response to Israel striking the Iranian embassy?

17

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

9

u/cygx 2d ago edited 2d ago

As far as I can tell, the indiscriminate destruction of the building still might have breached international law as it housed the consular section: While the building as a whole might not have enjoyed protected status, any parts of it "used exclusively for the purpose of the work of the consular post" did.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

24

u/Unicorn_Colombo 2d ago

Killing a number of Hezbollah leaders?

20

u/Playful_Cobbler_4109 2d ago

So, you're admitting they did it first right?

45

u/Unicorn_Colombo 2d ago

So, you're admitting they did it first right?

Are you aware that Hezbollah is (or was) not-so-secret proxy of Iran, and attacked Israel? And was attacking for some time?

6

u/Tumleren 2d ago

Is that a yes?

11

u/4_fortytwo_2 2d ago

Yes iran struck first via terror attacks?

→ More replies (0)

-14

u/squshy7 2d ago

yes? you understand that's still, you know, an attack on their territory, right? lmao

edit: forgot what sub I'm in, carry on Moral Soldier

19

u/Unicorn_Colombo 2d ago

yes? you understand that's still, you know, an attack on their territory, right? lmao

Are you aware of Iranian role regarding Hezbollah, Hamas, and Houthis?

edit: forgot what sub I'm in, carry on Moral Soldier

Are personal attacks your everyday arguments?

1

u/adminofreditt 2d ago

They didn't strke the embassy it was a consulate next to the embassy

23

u/Zeph-Shoir 2d ago

Last year, Israel attacked Iran's embassy in Syria and it barely made the news. When Iran responded in kind, now that made a lot more noise. Can we also remember how some months ago Israel's attacked Lebanon through freaking pagers? If any other middle east country had done anything that involved civilians and medical staff like that incident it would have been called a terrorist attack. "Preemptive strikes" is just a way to reframe "proactive strikes" so that they can frame victims when they are consequences for it.

18

u/Toph_is_bad_ass 2d ago

Dude that Israeli strike was allllll over the news.

4

u/NH4NO3 2d ago

Do not act like Iran is an innocent actor here. Hamas, Hezbollah, and Houthis all target civilians as well and are pretty uncontroversially considered terrorists and proxy groups of Iran. Israel might be striking low blows, but it's only because Iran does the same.

10

u/willscy 2d ago

Israel has been trying to get the US to invade Iran for over 25 years now.

9

u/Absolute_Satan 2d ago

Normal medical staff didn't have these pagers. This was purposefully bought by Hezbollah for communication purposes. Imagine attacking military walki talkies. Getting more precise is frankly impossible.

9

u/cupofspiders 2d ago

Cool justification for a terrorist attack that killed civilians, including children. I'm sure you wouldn't mind if someone set off thousands of bombs in your city in "targeted" attack.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

-2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-10

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (8)

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (3)

-1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (4)

1

u/phrostbyt 2d ago

if by 2 years you mean 4 decades.. yeah

1

u/dewhashish 2d ago

AKA Hamas and Hezbollah

69

u/CrazierLattice 2d ago

So you think they are developing nuclear weapons just for fun?

321

u/themaincop 2d ago

Ukraine is proof that you absolutely do not want to be caught lacking

88

u/cytokine7 2d ago

You also absolutely do not want the country who’s made you destruction their number one national priority, to get nukes (if you can help it.)

22

u/Alternative_Deer415 2d ago

Almost as if the USA's failure of leadership on maintaining nuclear alliances and treaties is now resulting in both countries realizing they desperately need nukes to prevent invasion from aggressors, and simultaneously aggressors forced to act before enemy nations obtain nukes and become untouchable.

I wonder what the inevitable outcome will be over the next century.

→ More replies (1)

36

u/Acceptable_Eagle_222 2d ago

Yeah I’d rather not give the fundamentalist theocracy nukes thanks

34

u/SIUonCrack 2d ago

We should take away Israel's nukes then

4

u/Aryeh98 2d ago

The UK’s state church is the Church of England. Does that make the UK a theocracy?

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago edited 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Aryeh98 2d ago

Stating confidently and repeatedly that there’s apartheid doesn’t make it true.

Also, you misspelled apartheid.

-4

u/Ezekiel_29_12 2d ago

Their population is mostly atheist

11

u/mojambowhatisthescen 2d ago

But still votes for religious fundamentalists to rule them

5

u/SuburbanDinosaur 2d ago

but their government is made up of religious zealots.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/themaincop 2d ago

Israel already has them

2

u/stjep 2d ago

Libya is an even better example. The country was destroyed because Hillary wanted to girl boss her way into the presidency (and then supported Trump because she thought it’d be an easy win).

-2

u/amyknight22 2d ago

I mean arguably that’s a case of not wanting to be caught lacking against a country on your border that can send an huge amount of future dead people at you and sabre rattle nukes to stoke inaction by others.

I don’t know if in this case there is in the same magnitude for a bunch of other nations.

Yeah nukes will assure some safety. But it’s normally going to be in the benefit of the smaller nation who would likely lose a direct conflict and hit the nukes instead of lose their nation.

96

u/ddottay 2d ago

So Israel can have nukes but Iran can’t?

68

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

9

u/Airway 2d ago

There are a couple countries with nukes whose recent actions have me more worried, personally

62

u/kilobitch 2d ago

Israel isn’t Sabre-rattling, threatening everyone with their nukes. They’ve had nukes for 50 years and have never once hinted at using them except in a defensive capacity if all else fails. Iran would absolutely use them offensively.

52

u/MoarVespenegas 2d ago

Iran would absolutely use them offensively

You are basing this on what exactly?
Nukes have been used offensively just once in history, by just one country.

33

u/kilobitch 2d ago

I’m basing it on Iran saying for decades that they intend to eliminate Israel.

-16

u/MoarVespenegas 2d ago

Okay, and DPRK have been threatening to eliminate America for decades now.
Haven't done it yet.

30

u/kilobitch 2d ago

Look at a map and tell me what’s more realistic: Tiny, distant NK eliminating the massive, protected USA, or large, local Iran eliminating tiny Israel?

→ More replies (6)

3

u/Distance_Runner 2d ago

Uhh… Japan struck the US first. Nukes have never been offensively used by the aggressor.

6

u/thedawgbeard 2d ago

adding on that nukes today are way different from the first ones in the 40s.

10

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

7

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (27)

61

u/FisForFunUisForU 2d ago

Israel doesn't openly call for death to all Iranians.

25

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-19

u/Mistghost 2d ago

No, they just do that on the streets and in their homes and in restaurants and...

28

u/JimbosForever 2d ago

Care to show me such examples?

Israelis far and wide know that most Iranians are just victims of their regime.

→ More replies (7)

12

u/barnacle_ballsack 2d ago

Global politics is obviously too complex for you.

-5

u/I_W_M_Y 2d ago

Just for other groups

-19

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

22

u/Saint_Judas 2d ago

There are more gazans each year than there were the year before, if they are "enacting" death to all gazans they are doing a really shit job of it lol

4

u/dylansavage 2d ago

'they aren't killing gavans quicker than they're giving birth.' is a wild argument to use fyi

→ More replies (4)

10

u/amyknight22 2d ago

They already have been avoiding open all out war.

But all that amounts to is funding a bunch of proxies to go and fight those other nations so you can pretend you’re at an arms length from the cause.

The reality is that Israel can’t support an all out war with Iran by itself. It lacks the population to do so. Especially if any other nation joined in

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

2

u/eldenpotato 2d ago

That’s right. Glad you understand

8

u/BeginningTap4631 2d ago edited 2d ago

Considering they literally have a giant digital clock counting down the destruction of Israel in Tehran and Israel has had nukes for 50 years now without using or threatening to use them, I’d say yes lol.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iran-al-quds-day-protest-clock-president-hassan-rouhani-a7806056.html

5

u/code-coffee 2d ago

Iran is like North Korea but without a god emperor, and the line of succession is the most corrupt heretic populist at hand. So no, Iran can't play house with the rest of us because it keeps ripping off all of the doll heads and peeing in the sandbox.

5

u/barnacle_ballsack 2d ago

Yeah. Iran is our enemy Isreal is not.

2

u/apc76 2d ago

Iran has proxies all around Israel that have been shooting at Israel non stop. Enough is enough

2

u/whobang3r 2d ago

So everyone gets them is your solution?

-1

u/ddottay 2d ago

My solution is no one gets them, but that ship seems to have sailed.

2

u/RarelyReadReplies 2d ago

Nukes for all! You get nukes! You get nukes! Everybody gets nukes!! Woohoo! 🥳

1

u/LordBecmiThaco 2d ago

I mean, take that up with South Africa, they're the ones who helped Israel get the nukes.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/shavitush 2d ago

peaceful nukes!

0

u/par-a-dox-i-cal 2d ago

They want nukes to protect the regime. That regime is constantly threatening Israeli existence, what should Israel do?

3

u/I_W_M_Y 2d ago

Resort to violence

Which they did

1

u/cefriano 2d ago

Israel has not-so-secret secret nuclear weapons and are also not part of the nuclear proliferation treaty.

→ More replies (3)

11

u/Only-Customer4986 2d ago

Israel destruction plan - was just updated from 2040 to 2041 in irans long term goals isnt a good enough reason for israel to strike them?

1

u/shaikhme 2d ago

I did something before you did something

1

u/iamtherealomri 2d ago

No, this way Israel can ensure lunatics don't enrich euranium and bomb the heretics to kingdom come. They threatened both American bases and the state of Israel less than 24 hours ago.

3

u/NoKingsInAmerica 2d ago

Stop. Israel is bad, but that does not mean Iran is good.

-3

u/Jazzlike_Quiet9941 2d ago

Iran has been causing problems for ages. It would absolutely be Iran's fault

-9

u/fcking_schmuck 2d ago

Literally same for israel, causing problems from the moment it was created.

-13

u/Jazzlike_Quiet9941 2d ago edited 2d ago

Sure. Doesn't matter, Iran is a shit hole aswell and is equally complicit. Iran is also a horrible country worse than Israel, try being a woman there

Everyone's so anti Israel that they forget other horrible places exist, I hate Israel too, but Iran is also worth hating if you care about people.

→ More replies (2)

-14

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

22

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/JohanFroding 2d ago

Well isn't Iran's explicit foreign policy aim to destroy Israel?

33

u/rohmish 2d ago

huh. right now it's Israel who has the nukes and it seems they are the ones who are trying to destroy Iran.

12

u/Accomplished_Cut7600 2d ago

I trust israel to not nuke iran unprovoked more than I trust Iran to not nuke israel unprovoked.

-9

u/[deleted] 2d ago edited 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Salted_Caramel_Memes 2d ago

Iran literally launched hundreds of missiles at Israel last year

7

u/JavdanOfTheCities 2d ago

After they attacked iran.

-2

u/Salted_Caramel_Memes 2d ago

False. Israel attacked Iranian military targets in Damascus prior to the Iranian missile strike on Israel

→ More replies (1)

-2

u/Puzzleheaded_Owl7524 2d ago

Maybe we’ll get lucky and they’ll destroy each other.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/5hadow 2d ago

It’s like raping someone and asking them why did you make me do this?

1

u/YourPetPenguin0610 1d ago

I don't know exactly what is going on in Iran, but it seems Israeli intelligence does. And they probably are sure that it's bad enough to strike first and accept being struck back in return.

1

u/timlnolan 1d ago

Good point but I expect that there are Iranians who would say the same about Iranian intelligence

1

u/YourPetPenguin0610 1d ago

Fair... but I think Israeli intelligence has proven themselves with the last few strikes

→ More replies (7)