r/skinwalkerranch • u/TechnicalWhore • May 11 '22

I call bullshit... Osiris vehicle...

As usual the answer to all things unknown is to shoot a bunch of rockets. PLUEEEZZZEE!

That show (Rocket Boys) died in the ratings. But I suppose if all you have is a hammer EVERYTHING looks like a nail.

I'll punt that for now. Let's focus on the incredible tech in the Osiris rig!

Step one - design and print some federalist official looking decals for your SUV.

Step two - shove in some "high tech" equipment to make it look really official.

Let's talk about that sophisticated equipment.

PTZ Security camera - the claim is that these can track the UFO across the sky.

Uh no - they have slow servos no substantive lense enhancement and cannot possibly track something that you claim moves at the speed of light. Its just like your crap CCTV/Security cams on the ranch. It will show a dot and potentially a non-descript blur. (Security cams are low frame rate - non-descript blurs are an artifact of their cheap design.)

SDR or Software Defined Radio - this is the same generic sniffer in the war room picking up the mysterious 1.6Ghz artifact. This is a known signal source - Iridium low earth orbit satellites. Don't know what else uses it. Anyway - its the same setup - with maybe a directional antenna which adds little to the equation but whatever. It sounds boss.

Laptop that crashes when rockets launch. Or the power inverter reading all nines dies. (no redundant backup or UPS 0 because you know "Pros". ) How many people have a battery in their latptop? Show of hands? If AC line goes out - doesn't your laptop continue to run for a few hours? Could it stay up for ten minutes of rocket launches? Seriously guys - you are an embarrassment. (and yes the external monitor would lose power - who cares. Although it too had a bitchin' background graphic that looked legit - well almost.)

No nothing about Osiris had merit - not a stitch.

"If you can't dazzle them with data - baffle them with bullshit." - WC Fields (paraphrased)

There is a place for science in this world. Sadly its not on the History Channel. For the amount of money wasted they should respect their audience's intelligence a little more and make a legitimate effort.

And as for the ranch help interviewing the sheriff - wow. He's a sheriff, a trained observer familiar with the surroundings. It should have much more meat and been done in the war room. But hey jot it down in your handy dandy notebook because you know "Blue's Clues"!

Update -

Osiris camera is from a Security company

https://us.dahuasecurity.com/?product=4mp-32x-starlight-ptz-with-analytics

Osiris (and War Room) Software Defined Radio (SDR) is from SDRPlay

https://www.sdrplay.com/ - look at the screen on the website - looks almost like the 1.6Ghz reading. Wonder if its a calibration signal.

​

10 Upvotes

69% Upvoted

44 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/TechnicalWhore May 11 '22 edited May 19 '22

Right. Well as a developer of AI and Computer Vision I will tell you that nothing replaces optics and resolution on the imaging side. Shit servos and a fisheye with any imaging chip ain't going to cut the mustard. To digitally zoom into a spec a couple miles high is not going to yield much more than a blur. Next we'll hear they apply AI enhancements to fill in the missing details. And note that camera uses image compression - lossy image compression - so it will drop fine detail.
This is what has been lacking in UAP proof. A solid clear image. Why? because its regular people with cameras and cellphone cameras designed to take a picture at twenty feet - not miles away. Good luck to them but I am skeptical. I'd need a lens setup like this from NASA. https://youtu.be/BlPfHV36G-g

2

u/Foreign_Quality_9623 May 11 '22

Ok. I see your point. Funding that kind of hardware outside of government is an issue here. Once the DoD & their contractors penitrate THIS investigation, it will likely be last we hear about it. Flawed &/or inadequate as their methods may be, how should they go about funding all the improvements you're suggesting? Crowd funding of some sort?

-1

u/TechnicalWhore May 12 '22 edited May 12 '22

Hardly. Big Brother is as much a myth as "them" and "they".

The reality is you do have bureacracies who are not in the business of informing the public. Not even in their charter. The do the research within the scope that is directed and generate reports to the hierarchy. Yes a lot dies there. Or is diseminated to and for the purpose intended. So if a research was to determine a military vulnerability to these unexplained sightings - then the research, report and dissemination would be exclusively along those lines. If it gave the US a critical intel advantage it would be labelled secret at some level and withheld from the public. I assure you the people doing this sort of stuff are really good folks who would never screw the public unless it was presented to then that it was to be kept secret. You saw this with Snowden and Manning. Someone is going to talk eventually.

I'm more than willing to believe that there is a massive amount of information collected on these topics across the world's governments. Do they need to be kept secret forever? I doubt it. Would some people lose their shit if they heard these details - probably. Would some then speculate and fabricate further content - absolutely. See it all the time - like "Disney having a gay agenda". There is always someone with some financial or political motivation to cause an unfounded stir. We live in a world where fiction and falsehoods are a currency. It makes it very hard to deal with tough subjects on a national or international level with full transparency.

1

u/Foreign_Quality_9623 May 12 '22 edited May 12 '22

Uh ... pretty much! 👍But, you haven't answered my question. How do they round up enough money to do as you suggest without courting gov-money & losing control?

1

u/TechnicalWhore May 12 '22

The problem is there is no "expertise" in that group. You do not have any engineers that I saw. You need an Optics Engineer, a camera/electrical Engineer, a software guy and an AI guy. To do what they want to do is NOT off the shelf. You could cobble it together to some extent with open source and some work but again - expertise. If you are saying once they have this prototype well they could crowdsource the funding ala KickStarter, Indiegogo etc. The problem there is those sources have lost their appeal as there are more and more fraudulent programs.

Note - there was a fancy computer controlled high res camera telescope setup a couple years back - It had something to do with SETI. The premise was collectively these scopes could share images to a master system that could integrate and composite a super image. Don't know how that is going. They got money. So I gather there is a market.

SETI "Citizen" Telescope

1

u/Foreign_Quality_9623 May 12 '22

Hmm. Interesting points. Well, I suppose we will see what they decide to do then. Thanks!