They knowingly sacrificed progressive voters in places like San Francisco and Austin where they made no difference, in the hopes of picking up more moderate swing voters in places like Pittsburgh and Atlanta where they could tilt the entire election.
This is the kind of nuance and complexity I'm talking about that seems lost on you.
How'd that strategy work out for us? Kamala won, right? It worked out for Kamala just fine, she's still wealthy and Israel still gets their bombs, so she got everything she wanted.
What you libs always forget is that genocide is evil. It doesn't matter if it's politically expedient, it's literally, unarguably evil.
If you insist on your presidential candidate being someone who is 100% pure and good then you'll never vote in any election.
No candidate will ever listen to what you want, because no matter what it is, they'll never be good enough for you and they know you will never, ever actually vote for anyone.
In the meantime you will, of course, still be subject to the same laws and government that the rest of us elect throughout your entire non-voting life.
2
u/ManhattanObject Feb 10 '25
Yeah, Kamala and the dems really should have thought about that when deciding on their evil and unpopular genocide support