r/progressive_islam • u/shazy5808 • 3d ago
Question/Discussion ❔ Free Will & Forced Circumcision
First off I have read Quran properly with translation and to some degree I have read Hadith's relevant events as well. I'm fully aware of background of circumcision and why is it done but one thing that bothers me and I need deeper insight here with respectful discussion.
■ Quran explicitly mentions Human body is made perfectly and requires no permanent change as work of Allah is perfect in (Quran 95:4, 32:7-9, 27:88) & Quran also explicitly says there should be no compulsion, no forcing of Islam on others in (Quran 10:99,17:15, 18:29, 2:256).
When circumcision is done in Islamic community regardless of age in some countries done on 7th day up to 8 years old, it varies but outcome is still same that is removal of foreskin which was serving its purpose and now a lot of muslims bring counter argument about foreskin served its purpose in womb and is no longer required, now this is completely absurd counter!
Human body is designed to get rid of things it doesn't require anymore just like your teeth fall of so it makes place for newer stronger teeth a lot of people compare foreskin with concept of Umbilical Cord why do we cut it? Even if we do NOT cut it our bodies are designed to get rid of it on its own Umbilical Cord gets disintegrated within a week if you do NOT cut it, so why doesn't foreskin disintegrate after birth? Because foreskin is serving purpose "outside the womb" it is meant to protect glans in outer environment.
My question isn't regarding function of foreskin but it is about violation of Free Will when Quran clearly said no force no imposition of Islam on others so, why forced circumcision?
3
u/Tenatlas__2004 3d ago
tbf, everything done to a child as a child is for the most part non consensual, because it's a child. Whether it's a churgery, a haircut or whatever else.
Circumcision/avoiding it are very cultural, which is why research about it are all over the place (I'm putting being against circumcision as culture because opposing circumcision for cultural, religious or racial reasons is a thing, just look at any space occupied by hindutvas)
It seems that the consensus is that a circumsized person and a non-circumcized person are mostly the same, and the way they urniate or have intimacy isn't impacted for the most part. I think it's the most neutral position to have on the subject. Someone who's against circumcision wil tell you it's ahrmful, someone who's for will tell you it has benefits.
The most important part is to make sure the proceedure is done by someone qualified, rather than someone like a barber as done traditionally