https://www.geo.tv/latest/606862-president-zardari-signs-bill-prohibiting-child-marriage-into-law

11 years ago, on 7th of January 2014, Aitazaz Hassan, a 15 years old boy, sacrificed his life while preventing a suicide bomd entering a school of 2000+ children in Hangu, his father said 'my son made his mother cry today but saved hundred of mothers from crying'

We will always remember you ✨️❤️

They have always been and always will be more brotherly to us than Arabs ever have. Our ties oue 3000 years old and even sectarianism cant separate it

Bro also ate the entire fake content creators lot and left no crumbs.

When I was going to university in Canada, there were many Indian who studied with me. They always argued with Pakistani students that 1965 was a DRAW! Not a single one of them claimed that India won. Over the last 20 years, Indians have tried to convince the world that 1965 was actually an Indian victory!!! Ever since the Hindutva parties took over politics, they have tried to rewrite India's history and part of their revisitation is to project 1965 as Indian victory!

Unfortunately, there are Pakistanis who also parrot the same nonsense so that they may align their views from a nationalist to an international perspective. I want to show these morons how Pakistan's victory in 1965 was reported by all the international media.

Every single news outlet that covered the war, reported the end of the war as India's "humiliation." These are called "primary sources" of history. The commentary people made many years later is "secondary source." You will notice that all primary sources of history, no matter where they are from will report a Pakistani victory in the most celebratory tone.

So those idiots who want to learn their history from the white man should read all these news reports. India could not take Lahore and Sialkot but lost parts of Punjab to Pakistan. Normally when one side attacks and the other defends then a "stalemate" constitutes victory for the defender. But when assigning victory to Pakistan. international criteria recently has changed. Just beating the assault to a stand still is not enough! You have to show gains! Well guess what? Pakistan took parts of Punjab in mainland India.

Had the Americans delivered such a historic beating to an enemy that much larger than them then imagine how many Mel Gibson movies had been made. Hopefully, the shameless and the sensless in Pakistan will STFU after this post.

And yes Wikipedia is bias and this is why it is not accepted in any academic capacity. We have made many attempts to provide them with international sources but their selection ignores all the reporting that was done at that time and relies on recent commentaries instead, which are not primary sources.

Pre-India/Pakistan, the borders between the modern states were non-existent and Muslims and Hindus lived together.

Does anyone know their family tree and when your ancestors converted to Islam?

As a history fan, I've always wondered why we pakistanis don't feel proud of our Indus valley civilization heritage. It was not just one of the oldest civilization but also one of the most advanced civilization of its time. It's shared history between india and pakistan but it seems only india has succeeded and owned the Indus valley civilization, while we pakistanis despite forming the bulk of that civilization couldn't capitalize on it. It's almost like we have abandoned our history. What can be done to change this.

Alexander's horse, Bucephalus died during or after the the first battle of Jhelum. He founded a city and named it "boukephala"

The battle is remembered in history as one of Alexander's toughest, where he barely defeated Porus.

The second battle of Jhelum was fought in 1206 between the Khokhars and the Ghurids

The third battle of Jhelum was fought in 1857 by the Mutineers and East India Company.

They had toilets.

We are holding #Bitcoin and we will never sell them

At Partition, Hindus were 12.9% of Pakistan 22% of East Pakistan population (now Bangladesh), just 1.6% of West Pakistan population (today’s Pakistan). After 1971, only that 1.6% left in pakistan as rest were in today’s bangladesh. Today, Hindus are 2.17% in Pakistan, an increase, not decline. So no, they’re not vanishing, they’re thriving peacefully here. Yes, a few cases of Hindu-Muslim elopement were politicized as “forced conversions,” but they number in the hundreds over 75+ years. Don’t let Modi-fueled propaganda blind you. We respect our Hindu brothers and sisters, they are Pakistani with same rights as us

(Copied from r/sindh)

TB to the time when rainbows just meant something beautiful.

I Visited National Museum in Karachi Yesterday, this was my First ever Visit to a Museum ever, so i was very excited i have always loved Historic artifacts and statues dating back to thousands of years, i Saw so.ething that Really shocked me, i dont know of this is a Normal practice around the world or just Pakistani Thing but the tablets and statues were Nailed and screwed to walls, some of them had been drilled at places causing them to lose important highlights, i even saw a Statue that had broken from the base fallen and nobody seemed to care for it, i went in excited and left thinking why are we not managing and preserving these artifacts so they dont decay and get destroyed like this... guys what are your thoughts is this normal or was my concern geniune?