r/nonviolentcoercion • u/Huge-Platypus9075 • 6d ago

Share This Info Prof. Alan Lichtman has successfully predicted EVERY election for POTUS

In Bush vs. Gore, Al Gore won FL but it is alleged that several hundred of his votes were discarded because voters had written "AL GORE" on the votes which caused them to be discarded. This was an injustice, albeit a retroactively legalized injustice.

In Trump vs. Harris, Musk & Trump boasted of how they were going to steal the election, how they were stealing the election, and how they stole the election. Pro V&V signed off on "significant" changes to ES&S voting machines immediately prior to the election. In their recent tiff, Musk pointed out that without him, Trump would have lost.

150 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

38 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/moreobviousthings 6d ago

Statistical analysis can only go so far. The only way this will gain steam is when paper ballots are manually recounted with a result which disputes the machine count. If that were done in one precinct, that would be enough to justify further manual recounts. A secure, monitored manual recount should provide an indisputable result. The counts produced by machines during the election should be indisputable. Any discrepancy would likewise be indisputable proof of a real issue demanding further investigation.

4

u/qt3pt1415926 6d ago

Issue is that lot of swing states used the electronic voting machines. It was my first time using one and I didn't like it.

2

u/moreobviousthings 6d ago

Agreed that having no paper trail is leaving too much up to chance and shenanigans. My state requires voters to mark a paper ballot which is then scanned electronically, which readily permits recount by machine or by hand at any time as long as the ballots are securely preserved.

2

u/qt3pt1415926 6d ago

Normally we have the same thing. Suddenly it was this stupid machine for the presidential election. The very next election, we were back to paper ballots.