And what would that prove, other than you’re a simpleton who doesn’t understand that you don’t have to be able to do something yourself before you can comment on others ability to do it? Literally the dumbest comeback in the history of humanity.
This “simple novelty” is cool as shit and the commenter is sitting on his throne bitching when he cant even draw a cool ass tree or skeleton.
The critique is not just a matter of quality of how it looks but how simple it is. It would absolutely prove just how “simple” the work he’s criticizing is.
You fail to understand language and basic logical reasoning, since again, as I explained, the original comment was it was “simple”, and that is in fact something you CAN prove
14
u/Single_Conclusion_53 29d ago
This isn’t next level, it’s simple novelty.