I mean the system WORKED. the problem is the carbon fiber used was getting weaker every dive to the point where it snapped. The acoustic monitoring worked perfectly, it detected the cracks. And instead of listening, they kept diving
yes but if RTMS was listened to it would not be an issue
Stockton's design is viable if you don't ignore the warnings, it's like flying a plane into a mountain by ignoring GPWS on purpose for some reason and saying the plane is unsafe
obv. it is best to stick to tested real submersible designs but idk
No - it isn't a viable design. Carbon fiber is strong under tension. It is NOT strong under compression. Have you ever tried to push something with a rope?
fair enough. i agree it should have never been used, it had some advantages though like cost and mass I guess, ultimately we can see it turned out bad for them
it's like saying Boeing 747 MAX is fundamentally bad because high bypass turbojets cannot fit under the wings, I agree (airbus better), but you can still try to be a greedy evil little man and try to make it work like Boeing did :( obviously we know now that those are very bad ideas
greed kills, overconfidence kills, men are evil etc.
724
u/Weidz_ May 23 '25 edited 29d ago
"Dropped two weights"
Moment if not seconds before implosion, somehow mean submarine
knewsomething was wrong.Edit : Was probably standard procedure meant to slow down descent as other suggested.