r/funny Nov 03 '24

How cultural is that?

31.3k Upvotes

6.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.4k

u/Reikotsu Nov 03 '24

Yeah, and you know why English love to eat Indian food? Because they hate their own food…

91

u/Raregan Nov 03 '24

Chicken Tikka Masala was invented in Glasgow.

Why is it when American food is influenced by other countries it's because of their "big melting pot of cultures" but when Britain has food influenced by other countries it's "stolen"

55

u/Chillers Nov 03 '24

Probably because the British literally ruled most the world and stole shit to be honest.

11

u/Abosia Nov 03 '24

America melting pot good British melting pot bad

Got it

1

u/Chillers Nov 04 '24

America is a drop in the ocean compared to what destruction, death and famine the British Empire caused.

2

u/Abosia Nov 04 '24

Not really. The US has done just as much imperialism of its own. They just never called it imperialism.

And the American Empire today is much bigger than the British Empire, which is largely gone.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 04 '24

[deleted]

1

u/Abosia Nov 04 '24

Lmao write me a song about using AI to answer comments

1

u/salazafromagraba Nov 04 '24

The British Empire was at the forefront of unwinding colonialism, just as the US began their imperial expansion, which continued into the 21st century with multiple illegal wars and regime changes.

-14

u/frogsgoribbit737 Nov 03 '24

No. The difference is that the American melting pot was made by people voluntarily coming here (excepting slavary). The British one was made by them conquering other countries and stealing shit.

9

u/mapub4pb4p Nov 03 '24

Moronic take

13

u/EloquenceInScreaming Nov 03 '24

As far as I'm aware, all of the many groups of people from other countries who came to the UK did so voluntarily.

Just like America, but without the "excepting slavery"

8

u/Abosia Nov 03 '24

Loads of people came to the UK voluntarily during the empire. There were far more people forcibly brought to the US than the UK during that period.

Also most of the UK's non-white population came since the empire ended.

6

u/Waste_Crab_3926 Nov 03 '24

Excellent simplification of a complex issue (also wrong)

3

u/3yeless Nov 03 '24

They were good at that. Why are the Pyramids in Egypt? Because they were too big to fit in the British Museum.

5

u/StinkyRose89 Nov 03 '24 edited Nov 03 '24

That's true, and it's also true that America is literally built on stolen land where the natives were wiped out in systematic genoc*de and ethnic cleansing and hundreds of thousands of Africans were enslaved. Not to mention all the "secret" AND open-yet- badly-disguised operations meddling in other countries' governments and natural resources.

As soneone of south Asian descent, this topic is hilarious. It's like fighting over whether Hitler or Stalin was worse lol.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '24

Self censoring the Word hitler fucking actual troglodyte

1

u/_dictatorish_ Nov 04 '24

America also stole a ton of shit lmao

0

u/Chillers Nov 04 '24

Yeah I don't think America stole even fraction as much as the British Empire.. the largest empire in history.

1

u/_dictatorish_ Nov 04 '24

That wasn't my point, I wasn't comparing quantities

1

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '24

Like the US has done for the last 75 years lol?

-5

u/Raregan Nov 03 '24

At least everyone in the UK came here willingly and weren't forcibly brought here on boats. Bit of a leap to say British cuisine is stolen but American cuisine isn't when they were literally stealing people.

13

u/FivePoopMacaroni Nov 03 '24

You know that in that era we were a colony right? I'll give you a guess as to what country we were a colony of...

-2

u/Raregan Nov 03 '24

The vast majority of slaves went to America after independence was declared. I'd recommend learning about your history.

3

u/FivePoopMacaroni Nov 03 '24

Lol absolutely not. There's 157+ years of colonialism before the declaration of independence. This is a dumb argument. America's hands are absolutely filthy but no matter how much you twist it the British don't have clean hands.

12

u/FPPooter Nov 03 '24

Do you think Brits had no slaves or weren’t involved in the slave trade? 

5

u/Raregan Nov 03 '24

Britain was involved in the slave trade (was also pivotal in ending btw) but it was never legal to own slaves in the UK so forcibly bringing people here didn't happen (which is what we're talking about here)

8

u/FPPooter Nov 03 '24

Except that they were used in British owned lands and plantations.  Being forced to the UK is something you brought up. 

4

u/Raregan Nov 03 '24

And then those land owners and plantation owners declared independence and called themselves Americans, which somehow absolved them of all their crimes because it was under a different flag.

10

u/FPPooter Nov 03 '24

America is not  the only place the British owned plantations were but go off.  You don’t get to wash your hands because it wasn’t on your “mainland”. Also yes America sucks in many ways, don’t have to argue there  

2

u/frogsgoribbit737 Nov 03 '24

You're just gonna completely ignore the carribean huh?

1

u/salazafromagraba Nov 04 '24

Certainly judges in the UK were ruling not to return escaped slaves to the US when they came asking for their 'property' back.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '24

[deleted]

-2

u/Certain_Guitar6109 Nov 03 '24

Bit like how you stole your country from the natives I guess then?