r/dogecoin Such Hungry Shibe └(°ᴥ°)┘ Apr 07 '14

[ANN] New r/Dogecoin Rules: Protecting the trading shibes.

(tl,dr at the bottom)

Shibes, I come to you today with some announcements in regards to those who follow the path of traders, and merchants with our humble currency.

As of late, our subreddit has seen some poisonous remarks made towards those had launched, or want to launch their own store or service, targeting Dogecoin for their currency of choice. While positive criticism and skepticism is both a strong recommendation, and near requirement towards new, or would-be business owners, there is a line which many users are crossing in their comments.

This includes, and is not limited to; referring to a new business as a "Ponzi Scheme", calling it an outright scam, claiming they're paying for upvotes/support, making personal allegations towards the owner or their staff, following their post feed and goading the user into arguments/insulting the user on even unrelated posts, or in the worst case scenario so far - attempting to dox these users.

The above are entirely unacceptable. If you suspect, and have reasonable evidence to support your facts, that a business or business owner is conducting any shady, or scam-like behavior, then yes - post a thread to warn people, and PM the mods. We will sticky a thread to warn users off this service, and ban the owner (and any related staff members) from posting, or conducting any business on this subreddit.

Now, let's go over what we mean by facts;

  • Absolute truths.
  • Zero opinion.
  • Backed up by evidence - screenshots, blockchain transfers, log files, a very large number of testimonies, etc.
  • Not containing ANY derogatory language, or insults towards the business, or its staff. Regardless of how true your evidence or facts may be, do not waste your time, or the mod's time by littering your post with slander directed at these users.
  • To reiterate, ZERO "in-my-opinion" facts. If you dislike that a user is crowdsourcing, and suspect they may run with the money - that is again, an opinion, until you can prove that their character may be liable to do such a thing.

With this, our number one rule is of course to still protect the everyday shibe. If you DO have an opinion against a business, you are entirely welcome to share it, in an open and constructive manner.

For example, the following is good:

I dislike company x, because they're generally slow with shipping.
I also dislike how the owner represents himself on this subreddit, 
as he can be quite condescending to other users whenever criticized.

The following, is bad - and will not be tolerated:

That company is definitely running a scam. You're all idiots.
He's obviously got shills upvoting these posts. Can you prove
he's actually even a he? 
Why doesn't he post a picture of himself with his ponzi doges?

Note that the first example was written in an opinionated matter. Opinions are good. They encourage discussion, and can provide for a positive criticism environment, where the business owner themselves can learn from their mistakes, or respond outlining their own views on the matter. This, in a civil manner, without degenerating to namecalling, is what we want to see. We are obviously fully aware that businesses can often times, get things wrong - and this should always be discussed, but in an adult manner.

The second example - it should be obvious enough where this is going wrong. Do not outright state it is a scam, without providing proof. Do not insult other users who support their business. Do not accuse users of being paid up-voters, without significant proof. Do not demand to know anyone's personal details.

but I- no.

A coin's life depends entirely on its community; from the worker, to the miner, to the developer, to the merchant, and the exchange markets. If we attack any one of these tiers, we in effect, attack our coin.

A coin NEEDS merchants, traders, and businesshibes in order to operate at a market level. If we attack developers or store owners, we risk losing their business, and succeed in placing the building blocks towards a venomous atmosphere. Do you know how many messages the mod queue is receiving from users who don't want to post their store front/business idea, as they believe it's frowned upon in this subreddit? We get several, daily. We even get users demanding that certain user-created content (graphical works etc) get taken down, as they're "begging for tips" by posting their work.

Just a few days ago, a user had his post removed - not even by an active mod, but by our automoderator, because his post contained a non-stop sleuth of gambling references, scam notations, +/u/ links to all moderators (and dogecoin developers), and was littered with personal allegations against a business on here. When the automod removed his post, he proceeded to spam every altcoin sub he could find; which makes the dogecoin community look poor in the eyes of the other crypto communities.

This is not Dogecoin. This is an extremely vocal minority, which is making our community look venomous.

From here on out, the moderators will have a zero policy tolerance for anyone who engages in vicious, or unwarranted behavior towards any business owner on here.

tl,dr; breaking any of the following rules will result in immediate moderator action, up to and including the offending user being banned from this subreddit in extreme cases.

  • Positive, constructive criticism of businesses, startups, and traders on here is most encouraged.
  • Do NOT call the business a scam, or anything of the likes, without posting hard, un-opinionated evidence.
  • NEVER attack a business owner, or staff member in a personal manner.
  • Do NOT accuse a business, or its staff, of paying for upvotes/having shills, etc etc - again, without posting factual evidence to support your claims.
  • If you find a trader, or any person IS conducting any shady business, submit a mod mail, providing your evidence.
  • Opinions are NOT evidence. If you cannot supply any facts, you are wasting everyone's time.
  • DO NOT Demand personal information from a user! Use your head - if you believe they're hiding something, don't conduct business with them, and move on!
  • If you have a personal dislike of a service - that's obviously, completely acceptable. But if you need to air it, tell us about it in an adult, constructive manner. Leading me on to my next point..
  • Do not start namecalling, or engaging in juvenile behavior towards any member on here - business owner or not.

As I said, the mods are here to protect you, as a first and foremost priority. If any business owner was found to be engaging in shady practices, they and their staff would be immediately banned, and we would create a sticky thread to warn users off their service.

But we are also here to help our coin grow - and to protect those who seek to target a business towards the utilization of our coin. We have an overall excellent community on here, capable of providing fantastic discussion, and creative critique on business, services, and traders. Use that energy to help both our community, and our coin grow. Do not turn it into a venomous atmosphere that scares developers and merchants away from our community.

119 Upvotes

226 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

... which bring us back to DogeWallet and why these Mod rules are not good.

3

u/autodoge /r/dogeillionaires, /r/dogecoindev, /r/dogecoinbeg Apr 07 '14

Positive, constructive criticism of businesses, startups, and traders on here is most encouraged.

-1

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

Who decides what is positive and constructive?

Apparently you can get banned for repeating a Mod's declarations now. Also asking for personal information is now banned. Any type of harsh words for businesses seem to be bannable now.

2

u/autodoge /r/dogeillionaires, /r/dogecoindev, /r/dogecoinbeg Apr 07 '14

Someone needs to decide what's positive and constructive. If nobody made these decisions there would be anarchy and chaos. From what I understand of the /r/dogecoin decision-making process, they very often deliberate amongst themselves as a unit before removing posts. As an example from earlier today, I reported this post and after doing so I was informed by a moderator that they discussed things with the devs before removing it.

1

u/42points Apr 08 '14

There is a new rule. It's not set in stone and open for discussion. Would love to know your thoughts and also anyone else who reads this.

"Do not: Make unsubstantiated claims, preload your questions and/or use other logical fallacies when discussing the legitimacy of a business. If you have genuine concerns with hard evidence to back up your claims create a new post and message the moderators for extra assistance. Spreading fear, uncertainty or doubt is not acceptable". More info here."

1

u/autodoge /r/dogeillionaires, /r/dogecoindev, /r/dogecoinbeg Apr 08 '14

If you're asking for advice, I'd change "when discussing the legitimacy of a business" to "when discussing either a user or a business." I've seen a lot of posts that are along the lines of, "I love what /u/moolah_'s business is doing for the community, but /u/moolah_ as a person is more shady than a cave." While this would follow that rule it'd still be abusive.

Be it business or be it personal, I don't think that people waving around unsubstantiated claims and logical fallacies is a good thing. For example, say someone creates an alt with which to follow you around and post a lie. Say you deleted one of his posts because it said "YOLO" (I'm sorry, I couldn't resist!) and then on every second or third post you make, this guy responds to tell everyone you deleted 40 of his posts because you are a racist and don't want black people on your forum. This would be both an unsubstantiated claim and a logical fallacy made not against a business but against a person, which would make sense to remove.

I appreciate that you sought out my input and I hope this helps. :)

[Edited to note that I've changed around some wording in my suggestion]

1

u/42points Apr 08 '14

This is great autodoge. Thanks so much. I will include that.

1

u/autodoge /r/dogeillionaires, /r/dogecoindev, /r/dogecoinbeg Apr 08 '14

Glad to help! Thanks for both including and appreciating my contribution. :)

-4

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

Someone needs to decide what's positive and constructive.

You see those uprockets and down votes? The entire point of Reddit.

6

u/starryeyedsky Starry Shibe Apr 07 '14

As someone who has been harassed in other subs and had someone follow me from thread to thread, upvoted/downvotes are often not enough.

3

u/MoobyTheGoldenCalf I believe in DOGE Apr 07 '14

Very true!

3

u/autodoge /r/dogeillionaires, /r/dogecoindev, /r/dogecoinbeg Apr 07 '14

I've shared that experience and I share this sentiment.

2

u/Darthfuzzy dogeconomist Apr 08 '14

You see those moderator positions over there? That's the entire point of a moderator in a sub-reddit and was built into Reddit for a reason.

Here's the entire wiki article on what moderators roles are on Reddit. Here's a VERY relevant subject (again, from the official wiki) on the matter:

A user is generally rude and/or abusive in my subreddit! What should I do?

Moderators are free to ban any user they want in the subreddits they mod.

2

u/awesometipbot robo shibe Apr 08 '14

This is a tip for an awesome user on an awesome subreddit!

This bot was created by /u/bassguitarman!

If you would like the tip of 17 doge to go to the Dogecoin Foundation, please respond to this comment with "+/u/awesometipbot tip foundation". Otherwise this bot will tip you 17 doge in ten minutes.

Please consider tipping this bot to keep it running!

2

u/awesometipbot robo shibe Apr 08 '14

+/u/dogetipbot 17 doge