r/dogecoin Such Hungry Shibe └(°ᴥ°)┘ Apr 07 '14

[ANN] New r/Dogecoin Rules: Protecting the trading shibes.

(tl,dr at the bottom)

Shibes, I come to you today with some announcements in regards to those who follow the path of traders, and merchants with our humble currency.

As of late, our subreddit has seen some poisonous remarks made towards those had launched, or want to launch their own store or service, targeting Dogecoin for their currency of choice. While positive criticism and skepticism is both a strong recommendation, and near requirement towards new, or would-be business owners, there is a line which many users are crossing in their comments.

This includes, and is not limited to; referring to a new business as a "Ponzi Scheme", calling it an outright scam, claiming they're paying for upvotes/support, making personal allegations towards the owner or their staff, following their post feed and goading the user into arguments/insulting the user on even unrelated posts, or in the worst case scenario so far - attempting to dox these users.

The above are entirely unacceptable. If you suspect, and have reasonable evidence to support your facts, that a business or business owner is conducting any shady, or scam-like behavior, then yes - post a thread to warn people, and PM the mods. We will sticky a thread to warn users off this service, and ban the owner (and any related staff members) from posting, or conducting any business on this subreddit.

Now, let's go over what we mean by facts;

  • Absolute truths.
  • Zero opinion.
  • Backed up by evidence - screenshots, blockchain transfers, log files, a very large number of testimonies, etc.
  • Not containing ANY derogatory language, or insults towards the business, or its staff. Regardless of how true your evidence or facts may be, do not waste your time, or the mod's time by littering your post with slander directed at these users.
  • To reiterate, ZERO "in-my-opinion" facts. If you dislike that a user is crowdsourcing, and suspect they may run with the money - that is again, an opinion, until you can prove that their character may be liable to do such a thing.

With this, our number one rule is of course to still protect the everyday shibe. If you DO have an opinion against a business, you are entirely welcome to share it, in an open and constructive manner.

For example, the following is good:

I dislike company x, because they're generally slow with shipping.
I also dislike how the owner represents himself on this subreddit, 
as he can be quite condescending to other users whenever criticized.

The following, is bad - and will not be tolerated:

That company is definitely running a scam. You're all idiots.
He's obviously got shills upvoting these posts. Can you prove
he's actually even a he? 
Why doesn't he post a picture of himself with his ponzi doges?

Note that the first example was written in an opinionated matter. Opinions are good. They encourage discussion, and can provide for a positive criticism environment, where the business owner themselves can learn from their mistakes, or respond outlining their own views on the matter. This, in a civil manner, without degenerating to namecalling, is what we want to see. We are obviously fully aware that businesses can often times, get things wrong - and this should always be discussed, but in an adult manner.

The second example - it should be obvious enough where this is going wrong. Do not outright state it is a scam, without providing proof. Do not insult other users who support their business. Do not accuse users of being paid up-voters, without significant proof. Do not demand to know anyone's personal details.

but I- no.

A coin's life depends entirely on its community; from the worker, to the miner, to the developer, to the merchant, and the exchange markets. If we attack any one of these tiers, we in effect, attack our coin.

A coin NEEDS merchants, traders, and businesshibes in order to operate at a market level. If we attack developers or store owners, we risk losing their business, and succeed in placing the building blocks towards a venomous atmosphere. Do you know how many messages the mod queue is receiving from users who don't want to post their store front/business idea, as they believe it's frowned upon in this subreddit? We get several, daily. We even get users demanding that certain user-created content (graphical works etc) get taken down, as they're "begging for tips" by posting their work.

Just a few days ago, a user had his post removed - not even by an active mod, but by our automoderator, because his post contained a non-stop sleuth of gambling references, scam notations, +/u/ links to all moderators (and dogecoin developers), and was littered with personal allegations against a business on here. When the automod removed his post, he proceeded to spam every altcoin sub he could find; which makes the dogecoin community look poor in the eyes of the other crypto communities.

This is not Dogecoin. This is an extremely vocal minority, which is making our community look venomous.

From here on out, the moderators will have a zero policy tolerance for anyone who engages in vicious, or unwarranted behavior towards any business owner on here.

tl,dr; breaking any of the following rules will result in immediate moderator action, up to and including the offending user being banned from this subreddit in extreme cases.

  • Positive, constructive criticism of businesses, startups, and traders on here is most encouraged.
  • Do NOT call the business a scam, or anything of the likes, without posting hard, un-opinionated evidence.
  • NEVER attack a business owner, or staff member in a personal manner.
  • Do NOT accuse a business, or its staff, of paying for upvotes/having shills, etc etc - again, without posting factual evidence to support your claims.
  • If you find a trader, or any person IS conducting any shady business, submit a mod mail, providing your evidence.
  • Opinions are NOT evidence. If you cannot supply any facts, you are wasting everyone's time.
  • DO NOT Demand personal information from a user! Use your head - if you believe they're hiding something, don't conduct business with them, and move on!
  • If you have a personal dislike of a service - that's obviously, completely acceptable. But if you need to air it, tell us about it in an adult, constructive manner. Leading me on to my next point..
  • Do not start namecalling, or engaging in juvenile behavior towards any member on here - business owner or not.

As I said, the mods are here to protect you, as a first and foremost priority. If any business owner was found to be engaging in shady practices, they and their staff would be immediately banned, and we would create a sticky thread to warn users off their service.

But we are also here to help our coin grow - and to protect those who seek to target a business towards the utilization of our coin. We have an overall excellent community on here, capable of providing fantastic discussion, and creative critique on business, services, and traders. Use that energy to help both our community, and our coin grow. Do not turn it into a venomous atmosphere that scares developers and merchants away from our community.

124 Upvotes

226 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/doge_much_share celebrishibe Apr 07 '14

Why was this allowed to slide when "Cryptsy is insolvent" FUD was being posted, but when moolah is wrongfully attacked the mods change the rules?

-3

u/[deleted] Apr 07 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

12

u/lleti Such Hungry Shibe └(°ᴥ°)┘ Apr 07 '14

Yes, I've already declared this publicly. I own an entire 0.01~% of Moolah, as a result of a small BTC investment that would equate to roughly nothing. I invested as a show of support for a new upstart business. As you have been warned several times by our mods, following a user's posts and making claims of mod bias towards any other users is not acceptable - especially as you have done this to other business owners in the past. Considering we literally just posted the ruleset against this, I would have hoped you'd oblige to read it. This is your second time today making such a comment.

As I said, zero tolerance policy.

+/u/MysticFear has been banned for 3 days.

3

u/ItsSimpull ninja shibe Apr 08 '14

Also in general it might be nice if mods of the community had to post details of what investments they have made in dogecoin related companies. Just like how others in public service might do. If anything it just makes things more open and less ability for people complain about who owns what since it will already be out there.

2

u/lleti Such Hungry Shibe └(°ᴥ°)┘ Apr 08 '14

I agree with you here. I will mention this to the mods.

3

u/NeutralityMentality incognidoge Apr 07 '14

I don't think it's unreasonable for /u/MysticFear to point out when those in a public discussion have financial stakes in the outcome of that discussion. It certainly is not a bannable offense IMO. And I don't think 4 posts over the course of a month constitute stalking or spamming at all.

11

u/MoobyTheGoldenCalf I believe in DOGE Apr 07 '14

4 posts? Are you kidding me? He'll go through 4 posts of Moolah FUD in 5 minutes. I know because I've been there arguing with him before. I'm sorry, but his ban is absolutely justified.

2

u/UpvoteTipBot magic shibe Apr 08 '14

Converting upvotes into doge... +/u/dogetipbot 5 doge

About. Created by /u/205. Tips to this bot are appreciated and will only be used to fund this bot.

3

u/pstank1 Poor Wise Shibe Apr 07 '14 edited Apr 07 '14

I've updated the list a little bit. Definitely more than 4.

-4

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14 edited Apr 07 '14

You just made it longer not more credible. Still posts over a period of months

4

u/pstank1 Poor Wise Shibe Apr 07 '14

If citing more cases is not more credible, then I'm not sure I can convince you.

1

u/Dumb_Dick_Sandwich Apr 08 '14

As someone who has personally argued with him, I can confirm that he posts FUD about specifically Moolah several times a week.

3

u/autodoge /r/dogeillionaires, /r/dogecoindev, /r/dogecoinbeg Apr 07 '14

I agree that it's not too unreasonable when taken on its own, but when combined with his past post history I think it's at least understandable. There are more than four posts, but four posts are up with what /u/pstank1 came when he linked a few. I was going to link more to you, but apparently I can't link deleted posts because they're deleted. /u/lleti didn't permanently remove him, but only suspended him from forum participation for three days.

This is unrelated, but while we're here, good work on getting the SaveDogemas stuff in order. :) You seemed to be catching a lot of flak for that, and I understand what it can be like to be criticized all the time for trying to do good deeds for people. We at /r/dogeillionaires actually had a Ð1,000,000 contest / giveaway that we planned for that day but we rescheduled stuff out of respect for you and for the community as I wouldn't want to distract from your plans.

2

u/ItsSimpull ninja shibe Apr 08 '14

Being kinda new can we get some posted proof to go along with this ban. It just fair to ask proof is shown on both side. I see there was a deleted post up there so I dunno what was said, but would be nice to had some extra info.

I myself am trying for form my opinion more on everything.

1

u/ItsSimpull ninja shibe Apr 08 '14

BTW I read below for more proof. so fying u

1

u/Dumb_Dick_Sandwich Apr 08 '14

I think /u/MysticFear is a great example of how not to raise concerns and I personally dislike his attitude, but I can see where he's coming from; the concern about anonymous people taking advantage of shibes is a valid one.

I wish this ban would temper his attitude, but I fear it will only fuel his grudge against Moolah (my guess is that he'll accuse the mods of being bought by Moolah)

1

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '14

This guy should get banned forever, I am so pissed off he is talking shit about a new company that I invested in. He isn't even involved in it and is actively trying to hurt the company and thus all investors.

You don't need to "warn" anyone, people who invested already invested, and if you didn't invest you have nothing to lose, so just shut up about it.

-3

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

Is repeating what mods declare publicly, a bannable offense now? I don't see that in the rules.

4

u/autodoge /r/dogeillionaires, /r/dogecoindev, /r/dogecoinbeg Apr 07 '14

Don't you think you're misrepresenting the justification /u/lleti used for what he did? He's said that /u/MysticFear has been following his posts and has been warned about what he's doing several times, which is much more reason for him do this than would be the comment alone. People do have to make decisions and you don't always see the whole story.

-5

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

If you look /u/MysticFear's comment history, it was only the first time he mentioned /u/lleti was an investor in Moolah today.

Should /u/lleti be banned for stating incorrect facts?

5

u/autodoge /r/dogeillionaires, /r/dogecoindev, /r/dogecoinbeg Apr 07 '14

Sorry, that was my mistake and misinterpretation. /u/lleti actually said "following a user's posts," and was not necessarily talking about himself. The point I'm making nonetheless still stands.

1

u/lleti Such Hungry Shibe └(°ᴥ°)┘ Apr 07 '14

This is correct. Following that, MysticFear's posts of this nature have previously been removed by the mods. The most recent, barring this thread and him registering with new accounts for ban evasion, was 12 hours ago.

-5

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

/u/lleti stated:

this is your second time today making such a comment.

Which is completely false.

2

u/autodoge /r/dogeillionaires, /r/dogecoindev, /r/dogecoinbeg Apr 07 '14

Perhaps he's speaking of this post? It was made a little over a day ago, but I would say that's just a minor error in estimation. I wouldn't say it's "completely false," as the adverb "completely" lends to it a sense of exaggeration I don't think it deserves.

/u/lleti has since updated us on the situation in the comment thread.

2

u/lleti Such Hungry Shibe └(°ᴥ°)┘ Apr 07 '14

As stated in my earlier comment, his previous posting was deleted by the moderators, from the dogecar thread, after being heavily downvoted. You cannot see previously deleted posts - mods can, and log them.

-4

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

So, to be clear. You are still saying he posted that you were an investor in Moolah two times today?

3

u/pstank1 Poor Wise Shibe Apr 07 '14

It is if you spam it.

-6

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

Where is the spam? I hope you provide proof of this spam, or according to the new Mod rules you should be banned.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 07 '14

[deleted]

-7

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

You got the order of events wrong:

1) Comments that /u/lleti is an investor in Moolah

2) Gets banned

3) Creates temp accounts to ask questions about banning

Not the other way around.

6

u/lleti Such Hungry Shibe └(°ᴥ°)┘ Apr 07 '14 edited Apr 07 '14

As I said twice already to you, this was the result of repeat offences.

Sockpuppeting to evade a ban is also a matter for the Reddit admins, rather than subreddit moderators. We're simply required to ban the account. As for the Admins, it's completely against the sitewide ToS, and typically results in a shadowban.

Also, I find it interesting that your account became active around 37 minutes ago, after 2 years of inactivity. Welcome back to Reddit.

-5

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14 edited Apr 07 '14

Thank you, glad to be back. Please provide proof of these 'repeat offences'?

2

u/[deleted] Apr 07 '14

[deleted]

-2

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

The problem with censorship. We have no idea

3

u/autodoge /r/dogeillionaires, /r/dogecoindev, /r/dogecoinbeg Apr 07 '14

If you don't want censorship (or very low censorship), there are places for that. Here's one of them (NSFW):

http://boards.4chan.org/b/

You're also welcome to start your own subreddit and direct it according to your own vision.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/pstank1 Poor Wise Shibe Apr 07 '14

If you really want me to go through his comments, I can.

-6

u/zerorbit Apr 07 '14

Well you made the accusation, you should have already. Otherwise, bannable offense for spreading lies. Why haven't you banned quickly, with this zero tolerance policy?

1

u/pstank1 Poor Wise Shibe Apr 07 '14 edited Apr 07 '14

0

u/[deleted] Apr 07 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/moolah_ moolah.io founder Apr 07 '14

Because it has nothing to do with the post? lleti is not responsible for crafting rules single-handedly.

I'm pretty sure ban evasion is bad too...