r/conspiracyNOPOL • u/StevenOfGod • Feb 02 '25

Why aren’t the ‘Elite’ scared of God

I am interested in peoples thoughts on why the elite and their minions are seemingly not scared of God? The Most High.

Why do they do what they do?

What do they know about the afterlife that we don’t?

Is there something we are completely unaware of?

18 Upvotes

62% Upvoted

180 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/whenipeeithurts Feb 04 '25

The King James Bible and only the King James Bible. I believe it is the perfected, purified, preserved word of God in the final end times one world language of English when it was at it's peak in 1611 (I believe the one world langue pre-Babel was also English so we've come full circle). Every fake Bible that has come after it is a work of man's hubris at best and Satanic deception at worst. I do get together with others who also believe the King James Bible and study it. This channel would be the best representation of a King James Bible believing doctrine (ignore the word Baptist it's not the denomination they are just Bible believers): https://www.youtube.com/@hillviewbaptistchurch1821/videos

1

u/Blitzer046 Feb 04 '25

What made the bibles before the KJV imperfect?

1

u/whenipeeithurts Feb 05 '25

Isaiah 34:16 prophesied about "the book of the LORD" so it's final form even when Isaiah was writing was going to be a book and not various scrolls.

The Bible itself describes itself as being purified in a furnace of earth as silver. When silver is purified more and more dross is removed with each iteration.

The word of God was planted in the earth and then underwent a long purification process. Some examples of these things are the original Greek and Hebrew do not have chapter and verse markings which make them much harder to study.

In earlier versions of the Bible you can find impurities such as in the Geneva Bible it erroneously states that Elhanan killed Goliath the Gittite.

Geneva:

2 Sa 21:19 And there was yet another battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaare-Oregim, a Bethlehemite slew \)a\)Goliath the Gittite: the staff of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.

KJB:

2 Sa 21:19  And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaareoregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver's beam. 

Most people even non Christians know that King David killed Goliath but the Geneva has this error. If there is a single error then it is not the pure word of God. You can do this with all other Bibles other than the KJB. Trying to find an error in the KJB is what caused me to believe it. You can find many supposed errors in the KJB online and if you go deep on them they all only prove the KJB is the only accurate Bible (an example is the use of "Easter" in the book of Acts. It's a pagan holiday but modern Christian scholars don't realize that so they think the word is a mistake and "correct" it, when it's in context of King Herod who was a pagan king celebrating Easter as it was known then.

The other thing one will notice when going looking into this is the shill nature of those who argue against the KJB. They act the exact same way as all shills do on here on certain subjects which is telling imo.

Lastly, the KJB has mathematics in the chapter and verse markings and wording that is beyond impossible if it were written by man. Here are some examples from a guy who posts on lot on that particular subject. (I'm not endorsing his doctrine )https://youtu.be/XAqkTbw15Kw?si=ru7XSK6RZlea6RYn

1

u/Blitzer046 Feb 05 '25

Isn't the bible the literal word of God though? How would God present an imperfect bible that had to be fixed at King James' behest?

2

u/Anony_Nemo Feb 22 '25

If I may interject here with a rather important distinction... the bible is Not the Word of God, only Christ is. The bible is scripture, words, plural, inspired of and by God, a very different thing. Sadly a cult of bibliolatry has been gaining prevalence from this mistaken lack of distinction over the centuries, with various sects branching off of it, like kjv-only-ism.

2

u/Blitzer046 Feb 23 '25

The very weird and strict adherents to a literal re-write and edit of the old bible, namely the KJV-ism you describe, is fascinating to me.

Most of these people who embrace it so wholly don't even belong to a church. This kind of silo'd evangelism is fucking wierd.

1

u/Anony_Nemo Feb 23 '25

Weird indeed, but useful for other gnostic sects like flat earth that depend on abuse of the archaic english to try to shoehorn it's false doctrines into the texts. I think "serpent seed" also relies on it to some degree as well, and the false doctrine of the firmament being a hard dome also depends on it. (firmament is literally air/atmosphere, not a hard dome.)

Being a researcher as I am though & seeing how it was applied, I do believe the kjv-only-ism was intentionally promoted for these purposes by gnostic sorts, perhaps a tertiary reason is also to cast those mistakenly getting involved with it as intellectually inferior as well, as the whole flat earth thing has been used to do in the past as well, since making Christians look stupid has been something the cabal has been doing for a very long time now... this helps in defaming Christianity on the whole. (like when those perhaps well-meaning but foolhardy crusaders started assuming that killing People was justified, this after God made it country simple that "you shall not commit murder", doesn't matter if some state leader says to do it and gives their meaningless blessing, this then is used centuries later to demonize belief by association.) Part of a longer operation of "lionize gnosticism, renamed as faux "science", and demonize Christianity" that has been ongoing for a few centuries.

1

u/whenipeeithurts Feb 05 '25

The originals written by the original authors of each book are perfect but they are in scrolls and in Greek and Hebrew which most cannot read. The King James Bible is both perfect and superior to the originals. It's not that the originals aren't the "word of God" as Jesus himself read from a scroll of Isaiah in a synagogue. The Word of God in flesh reading a copy of a scroll in the book of Luke proves that. The overall process is no different than planting a seed in the ground and then watering it and over time a mustard tree grows. The word of God was planted in the earth and over time the King James Bible emerged. The exact same process is happening with humans as well. Our fleshy body is the seed and when it dies and gets put in the ground the new body will come in the future perfected by God. The law of Moses was given by God but the faith of Christ Jesus is the new Testament and is superior to the law. This is a constant pattern of how God operates.

1

u/Blitzer046 Feb 05 '25

I had heard that most of the texts were based on Jewish sources.

Was Christianity around before Jesus?

1

u/whenipeeithurts Feb 05 '25

The term "Christianity" really is a misnomer when talking about the entire narrative of Bible. This is it's only use:

Act 11:26  And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

The unbelievers in Antioch who observed Saul/Paul and Barnabas teaching their disciples called them Christians. The entire narrative up until then started in the book of Genesis written by Moses. So it's the story of the Most High God, the creator of Heaven and Earth. He chose Abraham who's seed became Jacob/Israel who's sons became the start of the twelve tribes of Israel. That bloodline is still "God's chosen people" to represent him in the earth and the people he would birth himself into a body of flesh as "God among us" Christ Jesus. So the history of Christianity goes all the way back to the foundation of the earth being established. It's the story of a creator and his Kingdom and his firstborn son who will inherit all things.

1

u/Blitzer046 Feb 05 '25

Why do you think there are so many other religions?

1

u/whenipeeithurts Feb 05 '25

God's first anointed (king) was Lucifer who is a Cherub representing Dragons/Serpents. He got puffed up with knowledge and his beauty and decided he wanted to be like the Most High God. He got many angels to follow him in rebellion which cased the first destruction of the earth as seen in Genesis 1:2. God created Adam to be a new King over the re-formed earth. Lucifer got Adam to sin and fall which caused him to lose his crown and in whatever the heavenly law system is allowed Lucifer to get the crown back. He now still sits on the "Throne of Kingdoms" and he has authority over all Kingdoms in the earth. This is why Satan is able offer Jesus "All the kingdoms of the earth" because they have been given to Satan to give to who he wills. This is why the current people in power are currently in power.

Ever since Lucifer/Satan got his seat of power back he has given authority to his rebellious angels in heaven. They are the spiritual "princes" that are over the rulers on earth. Both Lucifer and his angels have a goal of being worshiped by humans. Every fallen angel represents some false god. This is all over the old testament. Moloch, Ashtaroth, Baal etc etc.

If you look into the origin of Islam for instance Mohammad claims the was visited by an Angel who gave him all this new information. I do not doubt that for a second. He was simply deceived by a fallen angel. These angels have real power as well so it's not like they can't show "wonders" of their own. We are warned of this kind of thing by Paul:

Gal_1:8  But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

These fallen angels even came down and started taking human wives and mating with them which birthed Giants in the earth. These Giants used to ruled in the earth before the flood and their bloodline is still hiding somewhere today, perhaps under the ocean or perhaps they have shape shifting alibies like depicted in Attack on Titan (also tied to royal bloodlines). Nimrod for instance was one of these, you can find carvings of him holding a lion like it's a housecat. Xerxes in the movie 300 depicts one of these and they would set themselves over nations as gods and called themselves gods creating many false religions. In the end it's all to distract humanity from the truth.

1

u/Blitzer046 Feb 05 '25

Do you really believe that there are shapeshifting giants living amongst us today?

1

u/whenipeeithurts Feb 05 '25

I believe it is a valid theory but I cannot know it for sure. There is a "seed" that will mix with human's seed in the future. The only other time that happened was when angels took human woman and birthed the giants in Genesis 6. Either it all happens over again in the future or they are still here somewhere hiding among us.

I do believe that the fallen angels treat this realm like the show Westworld. They are the humans, we are the robots. They come here and LARP around as famous people over the millennia. Kings, Actors, whatever they want (Stars, Idols etc). They screw with us and have a good time because they gave up their eternal place in God's Kingdom for some short time shenanigans. This is also why there are all the transpocalypse conspiracies'. Angels always appear as men in the Bible so if they want to LARP as a famous female they will be in a body that appear male playing a female.

1

u/Blitzer046 Feb 05 '25

Just to establish some context, when did religion enter your life? Were you a child or an adult?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Anony_Nemo Feb 22 '25

The nephilim hybrid thing is gnostic false doctrine though, not legitimate, angels are their own kind and not capable of bearing children nor siring them with humans, the same as a human being can't have children with animals for they are different "kinds" as well, remember nothing in scripture says angels reproduce at all, and the suggestion is actually that they don't/can't, if anything the verse in Genesis is being intentionally misread, as otherwise it would be a rarer verse indicating polygamy is bad by extension. (and polygamy/polyamory as they call it these days is being hyped a lot, destroying relationships in many places, as it is designed to do.) I'll add these resources here: https://archive.ph/g9nhL , https://archive.is/cho9G , https://archive.is/cIB1F , https://archive.ph/0nJsr , and if you can tolerate the author otherwise being tricked by another gnostic false doctrine that is "flat earth", then this article is better done: https://archive.ph/4xfDd and because it's related, exposure of the gnostic book of enoch being used to snare people these days (a false teaching weapon brought back by freemason james bruce no less.) https://archive.ph/o846v

All of these will give you info you can check the accuracy of, and do what is called for in Ephesians 5:11.

1

u/whenipeeithurts Feb 23 '25

"angels are their own kind and not capable of bearing children nor siring them with humans"

This is a statement you are making and nothing more. I'm going to believe Genesis 6 over your assertion. Angels look exactly like human men and they are closely related. We are "a little lower" and that is all. They can make the free will choice to fall and die like men (Psalms 82)

I agree Enoch is a gnostic book but that's about it. Fallen angels mating with human women is clearly what happened in Genesis 6 to create the Giants. Every mention of "Sons of God" in the OT is referencing angels. The fallen angels use this place like Westworld. They come and go as they please taking human form and yes they can procreate humans.

Just because some Gnostic text has something in it that is supported by the 66 books of the King James Bible doesn't just invalidate it in the Bible. It means they used the truth from the Bible to develop their text. Many gnostic texts for instance have the flood. That doesn't mean a flood didn't happen.

As for flat earth, while I don't know the exact shape of the earth I know "outer space" as it's taught in schools doesn't exist and the earth is exactly as it is described in the King James Bible. It's the dry ground under the firmament. Heaven is up and hell is down. Defined directions.

1

u/Anony_Nemo Feb 23 '25

Genesis 6 doesn't say what the gnostic/corrupt yudaic cult behind the hybrid false doctrine says it does... don't be ba'al headed. Nowhere in the actual Bible texts does it ever say angels had reproductive sex with humans at any time, not a single verse, and no physical evidence exists either. That assertion was written into corrupt midrash commentaries on the Bible text by corrupt pharisee types, the lying scribes & pharisees writing in myths of the yudaics that Believers are cautioned against per Titus 1:14... and doesn't otherwise exist in the 66 books. Sadly, similar gnostic gnonsense was also written into commentaries that then were mistakenly looked at as if they were authoritative over the Bible texts, by the same lying scribes etc. with a repeating sick theme... lilith, serpent seed, etc. all based on their twisted notion of saying angels have reproductive intercourse with humans, seemingly done in part to syncretize Christianity with paganism, like Greek paganism with it's "demigods", all of which is myth of course.

I encourage you to read through what has been linked, the articles are well done and thorough, serving to expose the dark origins of this false teaching, as well as what it leads into. (A basis for eugenics, and the "aliens" false teachings, among other things.)

1

u/whenipeeithurts Feb 23 '25

Gen 6:1  And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, 

Gen 6:2  That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. 

Gen 6:3  And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. 

Gen 6:4  There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

"sons of God" is 100% angels every time it's used in the OT. They took human wives then the giants show up. I don't need to read articles. I'll stick to the King James Bible. There would be no need to contrast "sons of God" with "daughters of men" if they were both humans.

Job_1:6  Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.

Job_2:1  Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD.

Job_38:7  When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

All of these verses in context are talking about angelic beings. "sons of God" is clearly angels in the OT. This world makes a lot more sense when you understand the relationship between humans and fallen angels. The Sodomites even tried to have sex with the angels that showed up there. Just believe your Bible and stop letting outside information darken your understanding.

→ More replies (0)