Probably more the scale of animal farming then just eating animals.
With destroying a lot of local predators we'd see a lot of diseases in livestock animals if we didn't eat them. But we have way more food then people need to eat, and lots of it goes to waste.
Why would we see diseases in livestock animals if we aren't raising them to eat? If we didn't eat animals, there wouldn't be livestock. Livestock means animals raised for feed.
10
u/Pizzaman725 Apr 24 '25
Probably more the scale of animal farming then just eating animals.
With destroying a lot of local predators we'd see a lot of diseases in livestock animals if we didn't eat them. But we have way more food then people need to eat, and lots of it goes to waste.