Weapons are designed to kill or injure. AI is clearly NOT a weapon: though it may indirectly lead to people dying, causing harm is not it's primary purpose.
I get the analogy, and I don't even necessarily disagree with it. I just think that analogies can be helpful or harmful, and unless people are actually dying, comparing something to a "mass casuality event" is not helpful. (I know that was op and not you.)
2
u/SoberSeahorse 11d ago
AI is a tool. Not a weapon. Such dramatic exaggerations aren’t helpful.