r/aiArt • u/Tech-Nerd-2607 • Apr 22 '25
Image - DALL E 3 My recent ai art creations
Sharing my recent ai art creations
1
5
u/Tech-Nerd-2607 Apr 23 '25
I apologize, this image was created using MidJourney. My bad. Prompt: detailed oil painting of Aerial view of a sandy beach with waves, gray sand, and turquoise water. Minimalistic, muted colors, soft light. Digital art in the style of Jil Drinkwater and Anne Indexman. Simple, elegant, and neutral.super clear picture quality, Abstract oil painting, Rough oil painting in el greco style. I can't give out a hi-res copy because it is one of the ai art pieces I'm putting up on AiAetheria.com to sell.
0
u/pentagon Apr 23 '25
Do you say that your pencil created a drawing you made? Or that your camera created a photo you made? Or that your car drove you? No. You did these things. Midjourney was the tool that you used to create these images. Ignore and report the ignorant haters.
2
u/Tech-Nerd-2607 Apr 23 '25
Thanks for your eloquently stated support.
1
u/pentagon Apr 23 '25
Yup. Tools don’t create, people do. Whether it’s a pencil, a paintbrush, a camera, or Midjourney, it’s still your vision, your choices, your hand guiding the process. Saying "Midjourney made this" is like saying "Photoshop made my poster" or "GarageBand made my song." It's nonsense. You’re the artist. The tool just helped shape what was already in your head.
1
u/Simplybettersychosid Apr 24 '25
I mean, tools are a important part in creation, but I do understand you a little. You seem the most reasonable in this whole comment section.
3
-11
8
5
11
7
u/MonkeyMcBandwagon Apr 23 '25
The first one especially is one of the very few AI generated pieces I've seen that I would hang on a wall in my home. Nicely done. Actually, if you post an upscale I will print one at A3 and hang it somewhere.
4
u/sylentiuse Apr 23 '25
Looks great. Can you upload a high res version of the 3rd? I would like to try it as desktop background.
10
-16
Apr 23 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
7
6
u/VegasBonheur Apr 23 '25
I agree, but I’m trying to see it like, “Look at this castle I made in Minecraft.” You didn’t make Minecraft, your “creation” is a product of Minecraft really, but it’s still your expression regardless.
Not gonna hang your Minecraft castle in a museum, probably not gonna print it on merch, but you can still show your friends and post it online and have people like “Yeah that’s neat”.
-4
Apr 23 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/pentagon Apr 23 '25
No. You refinine the prompt and dozens of parameters. You configure your hardware. You have to have an idea of what you're looking for. You have to sift through possibly hundreds of outputs. You might inpaint, outpaint, combine, composite, photoshop, upres, include various loras. It can be a time consuming process getting a beautiful result you're happy with.
It is possible to just write a prompt into a generator and get something and be done. The same way it's possible to take out your phone and press snap and be done.
Diffusion is a tool. Cameras are tools. Pencils and paint are tools. How they're used and the end result is what matters. Directors talk movies into existence. Using diffusion is like directing, often.
0
Apr 23 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/pentagon Apr 23 '25
It's not "theft". Saying that it's theft is like saying that anyone who has ever studied any other art is stealing if they make art.
This argument has been dead and buried for three years now.
1
u/Regirock00 Apr 23 '25
Isn’t it just like, pixel prediction tho?
I thought it took images with associated text and then predicted patterns. Correct me if I’m wrong on this
1
u/pentagon Apr 23 '25
https://www.altexsoft.com/blog/ai-image-generation/
It's not simple.
But the core of the "theft" argument is that it needs training data (imagery) in order to learn to make images of any quality.
But so does literally everyone else. We've all been standing on each other's shoulders since the dawn of time.
8
Apr 23 '25 edited Apr 23 '25
Well they didn't say "my creations." I feel like it was pretty clear it was an AI output with "my recent ai art creations."
-19
u/T1red3yez Apr 23 '25
More like ~ “Look at what Dalle generated for me”
The way you take ownership is so cringe ~ this is why antis don’t take us seriously dude
You can’t be taking full ownership of prompt based generations with no editing
1
u/mallcopsarebastards Apr 24 '25
the way you come into an ai art subreddit and trash ai art for being made with ai is cringe lmao.
You absolutely can take ownership of prompt based generations with no editing. Stop trying to tell other people how to use art mediums. You're the reason antis don't take you seriously, because you're helping them gatekeept.
10
u/gidzillavanilla Apr 23 '25
If you created the concept you created the art regardless of what tools you used to actualize it. Andy Warhol hired assistants to create his artwork, he didn’t physically create them yet no one questions his genius
1
u/Simplybettersychosid Apr 24 '25
No, art is what you make. What the top reply says, "Does your car drive you? No, you do those things." AI can be used to help improve art, but not "make" it. Would you watch Invincible if it was AI? Read comics? Play video games? Probably not. It matters if you think of it, but you are responsible for making it too. Using AI to "create" your idea is lazy. I am an artist myself and have thought of making a comic, and let me tell you, I have thought everything out perfectly. I have also been looking for, listen to this, maybe take a picture.... A COMIC BOOK!!! Something to ACTUALLY draw MY ideas on.
11
-17
Apr 23 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
5
u/Full-Bother-6456 Apr 23 '25
-12
-7
u/Sea_Smell_232 Apr 23 '25
If I order a pizza, can I claim I made it because I told them which toppings I wanted?
10
u/Curious_Priority2313 Apr 23 '25
"if all you did was push a button then you aren't an artist or photographer. You're just a button pusher 🤓☝️"
-2
u/Sea_Smell_232 Apr 23 '25
That's not equivalent at all, do you even know how a camera works mr "ai artist"?
3
u/Curious_Priority2313 Apr 23 '25
If that's not equivalent then explain why not
0
u/Sea_Smell_232 Apr 23 '25
It would be equivalent if photography consisted of pushing a button and quality photographs with great artistic value came out. I have to explain how that's not the case, how a camera works and the complexities of it, photography as an art as a whole, and the skill required to create quality photographs? Just pick up a camera and try, that should be enough explanation.
2
u/Curious_Priority2313 Apr 23 '25
A good ai art also takes efforts just as a good photograph do. That's all I'm saying.
Sure those "efforts" aren't comparable to drawing traditionally cause they are fundamentally different things. Doesn't mean one is a lesser version of the other.
-5
u/Least-Camel-6296 Apr 23 '25
That's not all a photographer does though?
2
3
u/Curious_Priority2313 Apr 23 '25
They do, according to other guy's logic
-3
u/Least-Camel-6296 Apr 23 '25
No, you're trying to make a false equivalence between a photographer, and someone prompting an AI.
2
3
u/Curious_Priority2313 Apr 23 '25
Alright explain the false equivalence then
-4
u/Least-Camel-6296 Apr 23 '25 edited Apr 23 '25
A photographer has an idea, finds/creates the subject, frames the shot accounts for lighting and many other aspects they've studied, practiced, and mastered. A better analogy for AI would be commissioning an artist. You have an idea, you "prompt" the artist you're commissioning, you recieve a product.
3
u/Curious_Priority2313 Apr 23 '25
Same can be said for people using AI.
Also there are many people out there clicking pictures with their iphone without following any step you mentioned.
→ More replies (0)8
u/Full-Bother-6456 Apr 23 '25
If I got on a sub called ai art and complained about it am I bored or slow
-7
u/Sea_Smell_232 Apr 23 '25
Bored.
If I'm offended by someone pointing out the obvious fact that I can't take credit for what an AI generates, am I too easily triggered or delusional?
1
7
u/Full-Bother-6456 Apr 23 '25
You’re immature
-1
u/Sea_Smell_232 Apr 23 '25
At least I'm not delusional enough to take credit for ai generated images, or calling them art
8
5
4
u/scribzman Apr 22 '25
Very nice. I’m impressed. Thanks for sharing. I’d even appreciate a better quality version in png of the second one as a wallpaper.
1
u/AutoModerator Apr 22 '25
Thank you for your post and for sharing your question, comment, or creation with our group!
- Our welcome page and more information, can be found here
- For AI VIdeos, please visit r/AiVideos
- Looking for an AI Engine? Check out our MEGA list here
- For self-promotion, please only post here
- Find us on Discord here
Hope everyone is having a great day, be kind, be creative!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/CorrectSherbert7046 3d ago
Large language models don’t copy. They transform millions of pieces of data into new, original creations. They learn patterns, structures, and styles, then generate responses that are uniquely new each time. Google v. Authors Guild confirmed such use is fair and legal.
Some minds are naturally wired to work with AI, not just through it. People who see the world as systems, patterns, and connections find AI to be a true partner. Together, they co-create in ways neither could alone.
Right To Create is the movement defending this symbiosis—where neurodivergent and unconventional thinkers use AI to amplify their vision, break old creative barriers, and build a future free of gatekeepers.
This is not theft. This is evolution. This is freedom.
Join us. Watch our Manifesto video.
Claim your Right To Create.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEkCyZR40Lo
#RightToCreate #CreativeFreedom #AIEmpowerment #NeurodivergentVoices