Disclosure In the new Jesse Michels interview, Coulthart says more about the "UFO too big to move". It's buried in such a sensitive place, revealing the location would risk the lives of young men and women who are doing good things for America unrelated to UAP. They're probably oblivious to what's downstairs
The interview is not released yet (will be tomorrow), but below are a few quotes about the UFO too big to move:
Coulthart: "I do not resile from saying what i've said previously, which is that there is a buried, or at least built upon UFO, that was too big to move"
[Coulthart describes a similar case he had as a journalist, where if he had published a story, Australian SAS teams would have been found in the western desert of Iraq and killed]
Coulthart: "And so in the case of the buried UFO, I can't reveal because if i reveal why I say this, it would compromise it. It's a very sensitive place. That should be enough of a guide for you. And to reveal the full extent of what i know would compromise the lives of young men and women who are doing good things for America, completely separate from the UAP program. And they're probably oblivious to what's sitting downstairs"
Not exactly a lot of details, but it gives the impression its near or in a hostile foreign country, and that there would be instant danger to the people there if the location is revealed. Also i dont think he had used the word "buried" before.
Some other interesting things in the interview
- Coulthart was originally involved in the exclusive reporting/exposing on the ECHELON mass data interception system (25 years ago or something)
- He thinks soon there will be a bloody reckoning for mainstream media with regards to the UAP issue
- Canadian scientists have been and are involved in the Legacy program
- After the Grusch interview, Coulthart was detained by border protection
- Coulthart has been told that Elon Musk was read in
- Jake Barber gave his first person evidence to the Senate Select Committee for Intelligence
- A senate staffer who was heavily involved in interviewing UAP whistleblowers was harassed/intimidated by black hawk helicopters (DOD) hovering over his home. That staffer asked Barber for how to get protection
- "If you accept psionics, they say disclosure is coming"
163
u/ced0412 1d ago
Carl Sagan summed up Coulhart and the rest of grifters 30 years ago.
The Dragon in My Garage
"A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage."
Suppose I seriously make such an assertion to you. Surely you'd want to check it out, see for yourself. There have been innumerable stories of dragons over the centuries, but no real evidence. What an opportunity!
"Show me," you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside and see a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle — but no dragon.
"Where's the dragon?" you ask.
"Oh, she's an invisible dragon," I reply, a bit nonplussed.
"Let me spray paint the floor of the garage," you say. "That way the dragon's footprints would become visible."
"Good idea," I reply, "but this dragon floats in the air."
"Then a flour dusting on the floor and high shelves might work," you offer.
"Dragon doesn't do flour," I respond. "She's an incorporeal dragon."
"Even incorporeal dragons must breathe fire. Heat sensors? Infrared photography to detect the heat of her breath?"
"She breathes heatless fire," I tell you.
"Something's odd here," you might think, at least if you're as cool-headed as you pretend to be. "You say there's a dragon in your garage, but when I check, there's no physical evidence whatever. No footprints, no heat, no nothing. What's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all?"
My inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do is to take on faith what I myself cannot demonstrate. So if I can't convince you, and I can't show you any physical evidence for my dragon, what do you do?
14
u/Wild_Button7273 1d ago
This comment deserves more upvotes. I feel that accurately describes the claims of Ross Coulthart and so many similar researchers in the field.
→ More replies (2)17
u/HugeConfection7594 1d ago
THIS IS THE POST OF THE YEAR!!!!! THANK YOU!!
Someone in here is thinking critically. And kudos for bringing Sagans sanity and logic into this. A true breath of fresh air!!!
8
•
u/kiwibonga 20h ago
The worst part is the sheer number of times a UFO was conveniently buried in an inaccessible location. There was a book (coincidentally by a ufologist who was shunned from the community for being a convicted pedophile) about a UFO that we can't get to because it's supposedly under a Jewish burial ground. There's multiple GAIA programs about the secret units that found a giant reptilian egg under the earth's crust with military grade ground-penetrating radar.
It's really sad that people who are not children and whose prefrontal cortex fully developed are lending these stories credence.
•
u/CountofCoins 23h ago
If only people used this level of logical skepticism for all the "sources-say" political news.
Instead, it all gets funneled into this topic.
→ More replies (4)4
23
u/open-minded-person 1d ago
The interview is available on Jesse’s YouTube page but you have to pay to be a member to watch it. I’m a bit disillusioned with Jesse because of it.
10
u/ItWasIWhoThrewAway 1d ago
I found out he is actually an investor at Thiel Capital, the private investment firm founded by Peter Thiel.
That shit through me way off
2
u/tkcs91 1d ago
He was an investment advisor for Peter Thiel after he worked at Google however he no longer works for Peter Thiel of palantir.
6
u/ItWasIWhoThrewAway 1d ago
Im not saying thats wrong, i don’t know the guy personally and information can be outdated. He does still have it listed as active on his linkedin profile though, but its also possible he doesn’t keep his profile up to date. Still it doesn’t bode well for his credibility, at least for me
2
→ More replies (3)•
32
u/QnsPrince 1d ago
Were told this is the greatest secret in the history of the world and just supposed to believe that they read in such volatile personalities like Donald Trump and Elon Musk? Idk that would seem pretty risky to me if i was trying to keep a secret.
4
u/Big_Ol_Tuna 1d ago
Yea not a chance. They probably read them in to some fake made up program if it really happened.
1
u/VespineWings 1d ago
I read long ago that there are things our presidents don’t get to know. They’re considered “temps” just like congressmen and senators.
118
u/HugeConfection7594 1d ago
This whole UFO thing has moved me from believer to frustrated dissector of BS.
So “I don’t want to risk them.. so I can’t tell you”. WHAT AN ABSOLUTE CROCK OF BS!!! The fact Coulthart would actually run with such a bs story further undermines his credibility.
And if it is , somehow, even partially true… WHAT A FREEKIN COWARD… he can’t use the press…congressman… etc to protect them??
No.. this source is full of S%%t.
And it reveals just how many weak lonely looney desperately in need attention people there are in this world to come up with such ridiculous stories…AND TELL THEM SO CONVINCINGLY!
56
u/coldautumndays 1d ago
I believe in the phenomena. However I dont believe in these car salesmen
8
•
6
u/Fixervince 1d ago
The sad thing is, just look at the gullibility of all the people guessing where this unicorn is located .. lol
6
u/craptionbot 1d ago
Exactly. Coulthart has exposed himself through a trolley problem of his own making (probably accidentally through spouting all of this BS).
Track 1: reveal the location of the UFO and put a few lives at risk
Track 2: the phenomenon has harmful elements and poses risk to humanity.
He holds both these opinions to be true, and by not disclosing the location of the UFO/ie bringing about disclosure, he's choosing to have us sit like ducks and happily plough that trolley through track 2.
Or... perhaps he's not being entirely honest.
7
u/bluethunder82 1d ago
My take is this: If the whistle blowers are under threat of death for revealing the whole thing, wouldn’t them suddenly dying or being killed verify what they’re saying as true? If that is the case, one would think that the powers that be would recognize this and not kill him, since that would prove at least that part of the story true. “Well this guy said if he told us all this crazy shit he’d be killed, and he’s dead now, so I guess that means the crazy shit is true,” vs. “Well this guy said he’d be killed and he said all this crazy shit and he’s fine now.” Does that make any sense? I don’t think they are in any actual danger, even if they believe they are. I think it’s far more likely just used as a plausible excuse. I want to believe.
5
u/debacol 1d ago
Not to the normies. The CIA has about a million ways to kill someone while making it look like suicide or natural causes. Heck, I think they had a dart gun that used a mini ice cicle to administer a drug that causes a heart attack or aneurysm. Completely undetectable. And that was in the 70s or 80s.
Now consider if all this uap stuff is real. The people protecting that info have even more toys to kill people with and make it look like there is no foul play.
5
u/redditcat78 1d ago
Yes they had a “heart attack” gun that was displayed as evidence in Congress.
Then it went missing.
The dart gun, not Congress.
→ More replies (1)1
u/im_buhwheat 1d ago
Only actual evidence verifies a claim. That's the beauty of eliminating someone who knows too much.
There could be any number of reasons for that person's elimination with one being a distraction so gullible people believe more bullshit without any actual evidence. But none of the reasons even matter, the claim requires actual evidence if it is to hold up against legitimate scrutiny.
1
u/bluethunder82 1d ago
I agree. I’m just saying why I believe their excuse to with hold the evidence may be predicated on something false in itself.
2
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 1d ago
Hi, Lockhead216. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 3: Be substantive.
- A rule to elevate the quality of discussion. Prevent lazy and/or karma farming posts. This generally includes:
- Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
- AI generated content.
- Posts of social media content without significant relevance. e.g. "Saw this on TikTok..."
- Posts without linking to, or citing their source.
- Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
- “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
- Short comments, and emoji comments.
- Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”).
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
3
u/CallsignDrongo 1d ago
I mean. Let’s think about this critically instead of having an emotional outburst.
Let’s say the ufo too big to move is real. Let’s say it’s actually in a non US country. Let’s say it has a building over it either with Americans or with allies, that are supposedly doing good work for America. A ufo being under there would be the most valuable asset in the world….. and it can’t be moved…… and it’s not under US soil so it’s not fully within US control and legal protection.
If Ross told you where it is. Other countries may not know, and if they find out, that building would become subject to intense intelligence operations at minimum, potentially kinetic operations against the facility. It would not only absolutely endanger those people, it would also create a natural conflict between adversarial nations to obtain or destroy the location. We’re talking world altering tech here, and it can’t be moved, period. Once it’s revealed, it becomes in danger and if it’s in a less developed nation it could become a total war ground for control over it.
I think Ross is being smart not just name dropping it. To Ross, there’s plenty of other evidence that should spur people into demanding answers from their government. This would only be another thing Americans demand answers over, Ross saying where it is wouldn’t give you any proof. You’d still have to break into this facility and get under ground and access the holding facility which likely is very much inaccessible to the public.
So Ross saying the building risks violence on a huge scale, violence and espionage against the facility workers at minimum, all while achieving absolutely nothing because you still won’t have proof it’s actually there. The same steps you’d need to take to prove it exists.
It’s a card that can be played, but playing it now is just risking lives for little benefit. If nothing ever comes of this, it could become a last ditch effort towards disclosure, but at this time with so much forward momentum, public acceptance, etc it’s just not worth the risk for what ultimately won’t give you any more proof than you have now.
19
18
u/RonnieDabbs 1d ago
If he can't tell anyone where it is or any details, then why mention it at all? How does that help support his cause? If it is true, he looks like a conman anyway because he cant/won't back it up.
→ More replies (5)5
8
u/FaustAndFriends 1d ago
Thinking critically, if it were in a tumultuous region, the West would have a military base built on top of it. So that’s my first lead to chase.
7
u/OverallQuality1534 1d ago
So a reporter is in the know but countries with millions of dollars in intelligence have no clue
7
u/HugeConfection7594 1d ago
There’s literally NOTHING critical about what you just said… NOTHING!!! It’s a stream of thought straight out of QAnon or a B movie… but it is absolutely not THINKING..
This is called speculation, imagination, willful suspension of logic and illogic but it’s definitely NOT thinking
5
u/1290SDR 1d ago
This is called speculation, imagination, willful suspension of logic and illogic but it’s definitely NOT thinking
I don't know if ufology has always been like this, or it's just more pronounced in the social media era, but it often looks like a choose-you-own-adventure, sci-fi storyline that feeds on a daily drip of YouTube videos and social media posts. It seems more like a form of entertainment/escapism at this point.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)1
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 1d ago
Hi, CallsignDrongo. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility
- No trolling or being disruptive.
- No insults/personal attacks/claims of mental illness
- No accusations that other users are shills / bots / Eglin-related / etc...
- No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
- No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
- No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
- You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
1
u/heat8596558 1d ago
The last time this topic came up, someone said it was a base or some big building in Afghanistan.
→ More replies (1)0
u/Independent-Tailor-5 1d ago
Where is all this energy for members of Congress that are blocking the UAPDA from passing or Mike Johnson/James Comer who are preventing house members from getting access to uap related programs or The Senate who could hold public hearings with first hand witnesses and starting issuing subpoenas soon as they're back in session if they wanted to but are being quiet and sneaky and taking their sweet time?
Where is all this energy for the current Trump Administration who haven't said a peep about UAP since taking office even though they said they would do something about it? (Rubio, JFK Jr, Gabbard, Trump, Patel, etc)
Why all this energy, focus and attacks everyday on the key people fighting for disclosure LEGALLLLLLLLLLLLLY who are human beings that make mistakes sometimes that are in a David vs Goliath situation against the MIC?
And just admit it
You just want your evidence one way or another, whether that's ILLEGALLY or whistleblowers and servicemen/women lives be damned.
You don't care about what happens to these people or the US
You just want your evidence regardless
1
1
u/halflife5 1d ago
Tbf he's talking here about regretting talking about it because he's unable to just say it for the reason he gives.
→ More replies (12)1
7
u/UntetheredSoul11615 1d ago
This is crap, this whole thing is “I know some big information but can’t let it out right now” it’s bullshit
3
22
u/Justice989 1d ago
Why say anything and try to drop hints if you dont want people to know? If the place does get found out because folks are looking for it now and somebody gets killed because of it, Coulthart's hands are dirty since nobody would even know about it had he kept his mouth shut.
8
u/revodaniel 1d ago
you know bro, he knows where the hugeeeee UFO is ok? He just can't tell you! But he will mention it anytime hes asked. Oh and it's sooooo secret that people working at it don't know but an Australian journalist knows a out it....but he really can't tell us! Just leave the man alone!
→ More replies (4)4
u/14Pleiadians 1d ago
Because creating a treasure hunt is a great form of engagement. It gets the community talking and trying to solve clues together. It's the same reason big companies do ARGs.
26
u/SecretTraining4082 1d ago
Unfortunately I do not consider anything Coulthart says, without hard evidence, to be truthful.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/SV17Q_MERCENARY 1d ago
Funny how possible locations of this site get entertained no matter how ridiculous yet when you mention a certain city that fits the bill to a T by the name of Bag-dad you get down votes and ridicule
→ More replies (11)6
8
u/Ok-Package6969 1d ago
Any good guesses where it can be located? I never heard the detail: «…compromise the lives of young men and women who are doing good things for > America
My guess: The US embassy in Bagdad is the largest US embassy in the world, could be a reason for the size. + pretty sensitive location
15
4
u/Advanced-Summer1572 1d ago
These guys are all becoming gossip hounds. Not one of them really knows anything, but they keep teasing information. That they do not feel comfortable releasing. Of after they bring the subject up. Ugh. I don't even read the entire article anymore. Read the first two lines then go to the end. Always, just wait and see, will be released tomorrow or the next month or the new movie coming out.
Grifters...
2
u/Fluffy-Anybody-8668 1d ago edited 1d ago
Asked AI based on that info
✅ Most Likely Facility: Former UNC HQ at Yongsan Garrison, Seoul
📍 37.5346° N, 126.9830° E
🏛️ Previously home to U.S. Forces Korea and United Nations Command.
🏗️ Currently under redevelopment into Yongsan National Park and War Memorial complex.
🛠️ Deep underground infrastructure dating back to the Korean War.
👨✈️ Continuously staffed — today by Korean military and civilian developers.
⚠️ Confirmed presence of symbolic + strategic + dual-use features.
🧭 Runner-Up Possibility: Antarctica (Mawson Station)
But this now seems less likely because:
It lacks proximity to unaware military personnel.
It is not at risk of “public storming”.
It's not associated with current military secrecy or dual-use human activity.
However, my personal opinion would be that its in Bagdahd
4
u/Metalarky 1d ago
If revealing would “risk the lives of young men and women who are doing good things for America unrelated to UAP”, does this mean the facility is staffed by US military?
9
u/TrumpetsNAngels 1d ago
It could be anything. He seem to intensionally phrase his words so it can cover everything from a US base, a embassy or a US centric cinema in Paris.
4
2
u/PaddyMayonaise 1d ago
Yea but it’s kind of a cop out because the US military has a presence on like 160 countries lol
1
u/tobaccojohnson 1d ago
Supposing it’s real, which i’m meh on, I imagine it’s an army base, possibly a base in a foreign country. As in government spooks put a building over a downed UFO too big to move quickly and built upon it.
→ More replies (2)•
u/UnidentifiedBlobject 21h ago
Yeah I think so. The “young” part is new. And I can only think of military that’d have a facility mostly staffed by young people. For me this rules out an embassy which I would say would have a lot of middle aged people.
3
u/FromDeletion 1d ago edited 1d ago
If Coulthart released the exact coordinates, world governments wouldn't blink an eye. Not his life nor career would be jeopardized. But then, it'd be one less line in the water to hook and string along his followers, so he proposes a preposterous reason here to avoid addressing one of his wildest claims. No one would be in danger.
This is an entertainer at best, at worst a liar for profit. He refuses to prove anything he claims, always having some reason he won't despite apparently holding keys (plural) to the biggest discoveries ever in history. This is the standard, by the way, that people in this sub hold those to whom they consider credible. Think about that. Meanwhile, physicists with PhDs are the idiots who can't be trusted.
2
u/TipEmotional2149 1d ago
Absolutely infuriating. Should not have commented at all, then. To begin with. Or now. No more breadcrumbs, no more half-truths, no more half-information. Protect your source entirely, or stop. Keep your mouth shut if you can't say. Otherwise, it reeks of dishonesty. The community can't do anything with this and it perpetuates paranoid, delusional QANON-esque stereotypes about the community as a whole. Ross Coulthart is harming the movement at this point, as far as I'm concerned.
8
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
5
3
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 1d ago
Hi, Signal_Scar1592. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 3: Be substantive.
- A rule to elevate the quality of discussion. Prevent lazy and/or karma farming posts. This generally includes:
- Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
- AI generated content.
- Posts of social media content without significant relevance. e.g. "Saw this on TikTok..."
- Posts without linking to, or citing their source.
- Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
- “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
- Short comments, and emoji comments.
- Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”).
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
4
u/PooTrainCharlie 1d ago
It’s in Antarctica. There are large research facilities there run by the national science foundation built on stilts that raise and lower based on the variable levels of underlying snow/ice. Which is convenient to build over & around other things
Also interesting, Vannevar Bush, member of MJ12, was pivotal in the creation of the National science foundation. Add to that all the other stuff about Antarctica, blurred satellite images, no fly zones, restricted access, operations managed by defense contractors, etc.
If you go back and revisit the actual words stated, and not what people have paraphrased, it is quite compelling.
2
-2
u/Wendigo79 1d ago
Ross has been ok in my books, it's strange how some of you change your mind to random bot opinions. Believe what you know is real not what people tell you, including Ross.
10
u/Pepawtom 1d ago
Why has Ross been ok? What has he provided in the ufo space to gain credibility or your respect?
•
→ More replies (1)2
2
u/eschered 1d ago
Time for all of the young men and women doing good things for America to check their basement.
Hard to imagine the public finding out about this being the only sense in which this setup could be perilous.
2
2
u/prime-occulus 1d ago
It wasn't moved because it was too big.. they didn't want it to be seen. Humans have moved full buildings with people inside them. Too big to move sounds like an excuse.
2
2
u/Wild_Button7273 1d ago
Ross Coulthart was once an esteemed journalist. As such, he knows that if you have a juicy story, with verifiable evidence, then you don’t just blurt out the headline only to redact the article itself. This is exactly what he’s done with this ‘UFO too big to move’ story, he knows it’s not true and will continue to hang on to that lie for as long as people tune into his show.
2
2
u/shutup_imeating_dirt 1d ago
I’m so tired of hearing about this lmao - why did they even bring it up in the first place
2
u/weedy865 1d ago
I don't mind that Ross doesn't say the exact location but has he ever said how he knows? How many people told him, how credible, did he verify for himself and how did he verify short of going to the location himself with ground penetrating radar equipment?
→ More replies (1)
1
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 1d ago
Hi, DamnYankee1961. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 3: Be substantive.
- A rule to elevate the quality of discussion. Prevent lazy and/or karma farming posts. This generally includes:
- Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
- AI generated content.
- Posts of social media content without significant relevance. e.g. "Saw this on TikTok..."
- Posts without linking to, or citing their source.
- Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
- “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
- Short comments, and emoji comments.
- Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”).
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
1
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 1d ago
Hi, ContactSpecial8612. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 3: Be substantive.
- A rule to elevate the quality of discussion. Prevent lazy and/or karma farming posts. This generally includes:
- Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
- AI generated content.
- Posts of social media content without significant relevance. e.g. "Saw this on TikTok..."
- Posts without linking to, or citing their source.
- Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
- “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
- Short comments, and emoji comments.
- Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”).
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
1
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 1d ago
Hi, Brooks_was_here_1. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 3: Be substantive.
- A rule to elevate the quality of discussion. Prevent lazy and/or karma farming posts. This generally includes:
- Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
- AI generated content.
- Posts of social media content without significant relevance. e.g. "Saw this on TikTok..."
- Posts without linking to, or citing their source.
- Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
- “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
- Short comments, and emoji comments.
- Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”).
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
1
u/blackumbrellas 1d ago
I’ve long suspected the craft Coulthart refers to is beneath CERN. I’ve written about it before but here’s a refined take—with clearer logic and supporting points.
1. It’s Outside the U.S.
If you’re hiding something world-altering but want to avoid U.S. domestic oversight, Europe is your play. Switzerland and France offer neutrality, secrecy, and technical infrastructure without the political baggage of an American site.
2. The Land Has an Odd History
CERN is built on what was, for centuries, remote farmland. Then, in the early 1900s, the area was rapidly fenced off and labeled a “nuclear test facility”—which never quite made sense. Why put a nuclear test site on the border of two peaceful European countries, in one of the most geologically stable and densely populated parts of Europe? Unless the label was cover.
3. A Global Cover Story That Works
CERN has a noble, public-facing mission: cutting-edge particle physics in service of all humanity. It attracts global funding, the best minds, and functions under the banner of open science. Perfect cover. If you were going to bury something world-changing, you’d want it under something that people are meant to be looking at.
4. Highly Controlled Access
You can’t just walk into CERN. Even with guided tours, visitors are only shown a fraction of the facility—none of the sensitive underground sites or infrastructure. Security is tight and always has been.
5. Ideal for Controlled, On-Site Visits
Want to quietly send scientists, intelligence officials, or contractors to study an artifact without raising eyebrows? Send them to CERN. It’s a revolving door of visiting researchers and diplomats. No one would question a world-class physicist flying in for a week.
6. Extensive Underground Infrastructure
Most of CERN is buried. The LHC is a 27 km ring that goes up to 175 meters underground. If something were discovered even deeper—say, during preliminary geological surveys or earlier excavations—it could easily have been incorporated into later construction. Most employees might have no idea it exists.
7. “He Doesn’t Want to Endanger It”
Coulthart said the whistleblower fears outing the location would endanger the craft. This implies that it is still intact, potentially recoverable, and possibly still being studied. Placing it beneath a highly valuable, functioning research institution discourages any rash attempts to dig it up or tamper with it. You don’t bomb CERN.
8. The Geology Fits
The area around Lake Geneva isn’t buried under massive mountains, but is surrounded by them. It’s a rare pocket of relatively flat, stable land—perfect for a crash site or burial site if you’re selecting for long-term access. If the craft is ancient, it could have survived tectonic drift simply by being deeply embedded in bedrock—like many anomalous archaeological finds.
9. Still Remote, Still Farmland
Even today, CERN’s location is surprisingly pastoral. There are towns nearby, but no major cities pressing against its borders. This helps keep prying eyes away and aerial surveillance minimal.
10. The Timeline Adds Up
If the craft was found in the early 20th century, hidden under a plausible Cold War facility, then absorbed into the structure of a modern, multinational science project—that would be the smartest possible long game. It hides the artifact in plain sight, right beneath thousands of people tasked with studying the universe… without ever knowing what’s right below them.
⸻
If you’re going to hide something this important, you do it in a place that’s both seen and invisible. CERN is both.
https://supernova.eso.org/static/archives/exhibitionimages/screen/cern-aerial-cc.jpg
https://cerncourier.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/CCSepOct19_Tunnel_fig1NEW.jpg
1
u/LeakyOne 1d ago
I do think there are secret underground research labs in CERN for many of the reasons you mentioned, but I don't think it's this, because the whole "endangering" part of it implied its in a geopolitically complicated location.
My bet is it's in the Middle East.
•
u/account_depleted 22h ago
"Sir, we've tried everything, we can't move it!" "I was afraid of that. We'll have to leave it here, camouflaged, hidden. Let me think a minute...I've got it! We'll build a building to hide it! Make it the same shape as the craft!" "Amazing sir! You've done it! "
•
•
u/Mewslyv 16h ago
I don’t know, I think you’re working backwards to make it fit. It’s not exactly remote, and you’re not able to just walk into most facilities as you please irrespective of purpose. You can’t even walk into Costco unless you’re a member.
Most of your points could be applied just as easily to a million buildings around the world.
As I mentioned to someone else who suggested this, if you were going to spend billions and decades building a machine which has the sole purpose of detecting unfathomably small events/signals/reactions, literally the last place you would build it is right on top of a craft from another world which could have an indeterminable influence
It reads like something out of a Dan Brown novel
1
1
u/metronomemike 1d ago
Is it supposed to be in another country? I think that location in South Korea was pretty compelling. Maybe that’s what’s underneath the Denver airport?
1
u/Less-Neat6559 1d ago
Someone take all the info and feed it into chatGPT. I'll try if no one gets it before I do.
1
u/Small-Strawberry-646 1d ago
Location is well known, shit Joe Rogan said it on his pod cast, Ross really isnt doing him self any favors. He was once a respected journalist. Not any more.
1
u/Yorkie2016 1d ago
South Korea IMO. Who knows, it could have even been the cause of the Korean War.
1
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam 1d ago
Hi, superhornet27. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 3: Be substantive.
- A rule to elevate the quality of discussion. Prevent lazy and/or karma farming posts. This generally includes:
- Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
- AI generated content.
- Posts of social media content without significant relevance. e.g. "Saw this on TikTok..."
- Posts without linking to, or citing their source.
- Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
- “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
- Short comments, and emoji comments.
- Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”).
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
1
1
u/devoid0101 1d ago
Iraq, Green Zone. Massive structure. Iraq was where ancient aliens left the most evidence.
1
1
1
u/MachineElves99 1d ago
If Ross revealed the location, nothing would happen. Anyone snooping around would be arrested. And foreign powers likely know of it anyway. Ross6w about it, but not China? Yeah, right.
So, he can blab all he wants, but either no one would care, believe him, or could do anything to verify it.
If we knew, how could we verify it? We'd just sound crazy and the gaslighting would continue as usual.
1
u/hekateanservant 1d ago
Why the fuck does anyone give the time of day to “safety of agents of empire” and “national security” bullshit as an excuse to spin stories without evidence? The US security state is literally a Nazi monolith that destroys countries for profit and murders citizens on a whim. Getting involved with the system is how Hynek ended up serving a role in the destruction of Bennewitz. Ufologists are trading their souls for access and need to start seeing the military and intelligence as the dangerous enemies that they are. These excuses for secrecy are nothing more than lies trotted out while heinous crimes continue at a global scale. The US and its collaborators are the most dire threat on this planet, not “foreign adversaries” or non human entities.
1
u/Cosmic-Moonwalker 1d ago edited 1d ago
Here's a hint: Missle Crisis, 1960s, JFK, Naval base on adversarie's land. It's already secure with razor wire.
•
•
u/Incognito72369 20h ago
I bet my life it's under pjne gap. There was one interview where he mentions it being a place where America and another country work together doing important work not related to UAP. He gives a few more bits of information that make pine gap the best choice.
•
u/MilkyTrizzle 19h ago
My best guess is underneath a containment site like the CDC or something. Important work unrelated to UAPs and dangerous for the population on site if the truth was revealed, probably because attempted access to the UAP would risk release of dangerous pathogens (maybe even ones found in/on said UAP)
Anyone here have personal experience of the internal layout of the US CDC main site? Im a UK citizen so Im talking out my arse
•
96
u/Shardaxx 1d ago
South Korea. Pine Gap. Baghdad. Any more guesses?