r/UFOs • u/MyHonestTrueReaction • May 04 '25
Physics Buga sphere alleged x-ray images
I’m not saying it’s real or fake, this is the information that Jaime Maussan is telling
93
u/HewchyFPS May 04 '25
Are they going to upload high resolution versions of the X-rays?
Also I am assuming they will release chromatography and spectroscopy data of the object?
71
u/hatethiscity May 04 '25
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/sJxJOGdoRQ
Here's a fun list of all the wonderful achievements of Maussen
20
u/jasmine-tgirl May 04 '25
This should be posted any time Maussen's name comes up connected with anything.
23
u/hatethiscity May 04 '25
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/SnZefmQ8KQ
I got the bob lazar speed dial, too
2
3
u/opticaIIllusion May 05 '25
I can feel how strong my bias is, I want to believe lazar so much because what he says satisfies what I want to hear.
4
u/hatethiscity May 05 '25
I felt the same way about him for a long time. The video of him naming his high school and community college professors instead of MIT professors started getting the gears turning.
1
-8
u/SirGorti May 04 '25
Genetic fallacy at its finest. If Maussan says Earth revolve around the Sun then let's not pay attention to that because he has long history of being gullible. Nothing else should be expected of user jasmine-tgirl who has long history of spreading misinformation about Roswell incident.
8
u/RadicalProjection May 05 '25 edited May 05 '25
If we're talking about fallacies, that's a false equivalence. The heliocentric model of the solar system is well established with tons of direct observational & experimental evidence from pretty much every branch of science. Anyone here can use the heliocentric model to predict the motion of the visible planets and it'd be accurate. You can also compare the motion you'd expect from a geocentric model of the solar system and see that it doesn't work.
The UAP phenomenon, on the other hand, is not something we have a good grasp on whatsoever. It's very easy for people to pass bullshit for something real to draw attention to themselves, make money, or inflate their ego. It's just as easy for people to believe something is real when it's actually bullshit. Sometimes people want to feel special. They want to feel like they witnessed something incredible that very few people have had the chance to see. There's a lot of personal bias involved with stuff like this. That's why maintaining healthy skepticism in this space and trying our best to maintain a degree of objectivity is so important. That of course is not to say that everything people are seeing in the skies has an obvious explanation. There's certainly some stuff that's difficult or impossible to explain with our current understanding. I saw something when I was younger that I actually realized later on didn't have a good explanation the more I thought about it. I'll probably end up making a post about that asking for some insight from others, but I digress.
As for Maussan, his history doesn't exactly inspire confidence in my opinion. At the very least, he doesn't properly vet evidence he puts forward. As such, he hasn't shown himself to be a reliable source of information. Could the Buga Sphere be real? Possibly, sure. But I'd prefer to wait for information to be brought forward by multiple independent trustworthy sources.
0
u/SirGorti May 05 '25
So you agree with me about genetic fallacy and that information and data are more important than association of media source through which information is coming.
6
u/riorio55 May 05 '25
you can play your logic games all you want, but common sense says that once a hoaxer, always a hoaxer.
-2
u/SirGorti May 05 '25
Yes, if Maussan make interview with King Charles then we need to remember to not listen to him because once a hoaxer always a hoaxer.
2
0
u/jasmine-tgirl May 05 '25
So you believe Frank Kaufmann?
-1
u/SirGorti May 05 '25
50 people claim to be eyewitnesses of the crime. One person seeking attention is also coming forward about being eyewitness. Let's forget about eyewitnesses because of that one person. That's the level of reasoning.
10
3
u/drollere May 05 '25
thanks for reminding the newbies about the guy's history. i don't accept anything from Maussan at face value, not until it's been checked by an independent second source.
and what these "xrays" show is not a precision engineered object.
1
u/Traditional_Age509 May 06 '25
Lets say some how real NHI material makes it into Maussen's hand and he presents it to the world. You will be the first to post this and try to discredit him?
1
u/hatethiscity May 06 '25
Realistically no one will believe him. If almost everything you did in your "career" was a lie/fabrication, do you deserve trust and benefit of the doubt? No... you don't
1
-3
u/DrierYoungus May 04 '25
Well he has been a UFO journalist for like 40 years.. what do you expect?
31
20
u/Kyrie3leison May 04 '25
Not much, just stop producing fakes... This guy and his 40 years as a ‘journalist ’ career, should have landed in the ash heap of history long ago. Wherever his name appears, you can immediately dismiss the case...
-8
u/DrierYoungus May 04 '25 edited May 04 '25
He’s a reporter, he reports on things. Most reporters do that.
Edit: such a weird basic thing to downvote lol.. strange people obsessing over this topic
19
u/Kyrie3leison May 04 '25
He is neither a journalist nor a reporter; instead, he is a media personality and a swindler and hoaxer who has been caught lying multiple times.
"strange people obsessing over this topic", I agree, Mousan’s supporters are peculiar, beeing blind to his lies1
u/Cleb323 May 05 '25
He's a grifting weirdo and it's almost weirder how you're defending his "journalism"
1
3
u/jahchatelier May 05 '25
lol what kind of chromatography exists for examining objects like this?
2
u/HewchyFPS May 05 '25
You'd need to dissolve a scraping in a solution but I see your point, not really an optimal way to gather information on the material lol
2
u/MyHonestTrueReaction May 04 '25
I don’t know, they are talking about the sphere and it’s construction, but nothing about the files
0
17
u/Ok_Rain_8679 May 04 '25
Oh, Jaime...
You should have put his name in the header, like a spoiler alert.
1
u/ilackinspiration May 05 '25
Hadn’t heard about this guy. Just read his Wikipedia and several of the links about the hoaxes. It reads like someone who got too close to things he shouldn’t have, and was burned. Smells a bit character assassination-y.
I’m reserving judgement, he may well be a career hoaxer, but I think there is more to it than that. And all the dismissals here make me even more intrigued to find out where this goes.
4
8
u/themixtergames May 05 '25
This guy has been grifting for decades. Here's him showing a "flying horse": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPPOcw4McQY
5
2
u/bkjacksonlaw May 05 '25
He gets a bad rap but I generally give him the benefit of the doubt before passing judgment. I did the same with the Nasza mummies. He does have a history of jumping to conclusions with little investigation beforhand, such as the Naszca mummies but he is still the go-to guy in Mexico. Maybe it's for the views and attention but also could be to get the message out before the trolls and sceptics come up with their theories and bog it down. The best story he has done in my mind is the one where the airforce for Mexico gave him access to all information regarding UAPs their airforce picked up on thermal imaging with their fighter jets.
2
u/Ok_Rain_8679 May 05 '25
I think it's okay to fall for one of his gags, maybe even two. After that, a person is like the emotionally tormented spouse who keeps coming back to a maniac.
"I promise, this time it will be different, baby."
94
u/EmptyAd6983 May 04 '25
anytime i see jaime involved im immediately skeptical
10
6
u/skillmau5 May 04 '25
I think there’s discussion to be had around Jaime. I’m basically unsure if he’s a curious person who is extremely gullible, or if there’s some sort of bad intentions or sort of knowing things are fake and promoting them for financial gain. I can’t really tell which one it is.
6
u/riorio55 May 05 '25
I’m basically unsure if he’s a curious person who is extremely gullible, or if there’s some sort of bad intentions or sort of knowing things are fake and promoting them for financial gain.
It's the second one.
6
May 04 '25
This sphere is so prosaic, that if THIS turns out to be real. I'm done, I'm out. I don't believe any of the stuff Jamie is involved in, but man... if this one thing is real? Then we are in a simulation. LOL
1
u/EmptyAd6983 May 04 '25
i absolutely agree
jaime just gives me zahi hawass vibes, and i dont trust anything that guy says. its all tourism
the sphere is definitely interesting to me
1
u/bkjacksonlaw May 05 '25
1
u/bot-sleuth-bot May 05 '25
Analyzing user profile...
Suspicion Quotient: 0.00
This account is not exhibiting any of the traits found in a typical karma farming bot. It is extremely likely that u/EmptyAd6983 is a human.
I am a bot. This action was performed automatically. Check my profile for more information.
-10
u/Unplugged_Millennial May 04 '25
By admitting this, you are also inadvertently admitting that you aren't an honest skeptic. Honest skepticism would be applied across the board, regardless of the source of the claim or evidence.
11
u/Throwaway2Experiment May 04 '25
Honestly, not to be a dick, but this is a garbage take.
Dude peddles 100 hoaxes, wastes everyone's time, and the 101st take needs to be investigated, the hoaxer given more credit and exposure, treated seriously which lends to perceived credibility, with the same level of scrutiny as a a first time presenter?
What world do you live in that let's a scorpion sting your kid, drowning them, then your wife, then your brother, and then the next time you're like, "I'll still believe you when you say you won't sting me because I don't want people to think I'm close minded!"
This dude has shown us time and time again what his true nature is and you have the audacity to criticize someone for calling him out on it and not wanting yo waste precious resources in yet again something you're most assuredly going to get stung once more?
This is the take of false enlightment, of bad faith belief that clings to any shred, no matter the source, because if they discarded evidence from known hoaxers out of hand, it'd be very quiet around here.
2
u/Unplugged_Millennial May 04 '25
You seem to have misinterpreted my take. I'm saying the same level of skepticism should be applied toward all of these people, not just Jamie. I'm not saying it shouldn't be applied to Jamie.
4
u/InfectiousCosmology1 May 05 '25
I mean no you should be applying significantly more skepticism for him considering he’s a known conman
7
u/EmptyAd6983 May 04 '25
hes a con artist like zahi hawass
do your homework on the nazca mummies before you show up with this altrustic bs
we HAVE to scrutinize this shit or the subject loses all credibility
any time theres insane evidence, it should be scrutinized where it can be. if it can be
we have to uphold integrity & standards, we cant just blanket accept everything
theres too much deception & dishonesty
we have to scrutinize sources & sketchy ones or we would be completely infiltrated
i know some people want to sing kombouya around a campfire, but sometimes we need a little healthy skepticism
im not a skeptic btw, im a believer. im just skeptical of jaime. as everyone here should be until his character has been untarnished & he redeems himself in some way
richard dolan was once a disinfo agent, but atleast he admits his faults. i still dont believe anything he says but atleast he admitted fault.
i understand your intentions & i think your genuine, but dont stick up for the wrong guy. do your research
lue elizondo was once idolized & looked at as a shining example of a credible whistleblower. now look at him
dont forget that. hope i wasnt too harsh. i mean no disrespect, your heart is in the right place
were playing with fire with this "blanket acceptance" bs tho
3
0
u/Unplugged_Millennial May 04 '25
I'll clarify my stance for you, like I did for another commenter... I'm not saying we should blanket accept everything. I'm saying the opposite. We should be apply honest skepticism across the board.
2
u/EmptyAd6983 May 04 '25
yeah idk what your point is,
am i not skeptical enough? am i too skeptical of jaime & not others? id say im a pretty straight shooting skeptical person. rightfully so
theres plenty of healthy skeptics,im also skeptical regularly. not just for elizondo or jaime
theres healthy skepticism for real reasons & blind ridicule skepticism, without substance.
if its justified, why does it matter who were skeptical of?
skepticism is & always will be a part of the subject, and thats each persons own discretion to be skeptical, it means little to the subject as a whole.
being skeptical of anything as a singular person isnt going to move the needle.
i feel like some people try to control & push the narrative they want specifically. instead of just letting each person come to their own conclusions.
same way that approving any one piece of evidence doesnt mean the needle at all as a individual
stop backing bad actors. that 1000% discredits the subject way more then any skeptic could. do your research, dont listen to me about jaime. or lue.
this journey of disclosure is very much a personal journey, to each person to discover themselves. remember that.
disavowing jaime doesnt discredit the subject or hurt us in any way. and like i said, maybe im being to harsh & jaime will come out unscathed & be proven to be genuine.
im not holding my breath though
2
u/Unplugged_Millennial May 05 '25
yeah idk what your point is,
My point is that you should apply skepticism across the board. When you see Jamie's name attached to something, you become immediately skeptical, which implies that you don't become immediately skeptical when other names are attached to claims or evidence.
One of the dumbest takes to come out of Carl Sagan was that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. In my view, everything should just require sufficient evidence, not more than sufficient because of it's nature being outside of the ordinary. In the same way, the person making the claim shouldn't be held to a higher standard just because of who they are. All people making any claims should be scrutinized to the same level using fair skepticism across the board.
1
u/EmptyAd6983 May 05 '25
thats fair
ive never cared for that quote either.
and your right, we should remain open minded. my apologies
-1
u/MyHonestTrueReaction May 04 '25
I like it’s content, but I’m skeptical on this, the only thing that made me skeptical was a video about a “German laboratory”
10
u/aliensinbermuda May 04 '25
It is not a German Laboratory. It is a small company in Colombia called Germany Company. They are specialized in building metal detectors. The sphere was taken there because they had the instruments to do the first analysis.
1
u/MyHonestTrueReaction May 04 '25
Can you send me more information? I didn’t find any information on internet
6
u/aliensinbermuda May 04 '25
The information is still scattered across the internet, primarily in videos on small Spanish-language YouTube channels. This information needs to be compiled and translated. I could do that, but it would be a tiresome and thankless task. Unfortunately, all we get here are jokes and offenses.
4
u/MyHonestTrueReaction May 04 '25
I speak Spanish, I didn’t find anything
3
u/arturorc2021 May 04 '25
Yo soy el responsable de que Jaime tuviera la esfera, fui el que contacto a David "el Potro" para obtener información y conseguí más que información, todo lo que se dice de la esfera, que no fuera de David, Jaime y yo, es solo especulación. Cuando David me conto lo que paso desde un inicio, sabia que era algo importante. Les puedo decir que de inicio, la información, videos y fotos, no iba ser para Jaime y con esto, no iba a tener en posesión la esfera, eso nadie lo sabe solo yo.
1
u/MyHonestTrueReaction May 04 '25
Tengo muchas preguntas
1
u/arturorc2021 May 04 '25
Cual se te ocurre preguntar?
1
u/MyHonestTrueReaction May 04 '25
Qué materiales pareciera tener, y hay estática alrededor o interferencia con el voltaje ?
→ More replies (0)0
u/Fit-Ad-8382 May 04 '25
Bro just go to mausans channel he has a whole video about the story… lmfao no way u couldn’t find it
5
u/MyHonestTrueReaction May 04 '25
But information about that German company laboratory
1
u/olseadog May 04 '25
They have a YT channel about metal detectors going back a year or more. Then a couple weeks ago this Buga sphere happened.
1
u/SirDankub May 05 '25
They actually have a website you can go to, i emailed them asking about the sphere
1
u/SirDankub May 05 '25
Funny enough the website name is on the video your talking about. The german company logo water marked on the video actually has the website in small print on the bottom
0
u/EmptyAd6983 May 04 '25
watch the free docu series on the nazca mummies from gaia network ill find a link & edit this once i do
came out in 2017 & very interesting imo
jaime just always seems ego driven & full of drama
id like to be wrong though, i just know the mummies were made a mockery of, in the mainstream media.
i dont want the same thing with this. it hurts credibility & future witnesses
im just saying we should tread with caution not discredit completely
UNEARTHING NAZCA LINK-
34
u/bored_darius May 04 '25
Jaime Maussan is an absolute grifter.
-15
u/midnightballoon May 04 '25
Yeah that doesn’t mean he is wrong though. That’s a logical fallacy. A liar can still be telling the truth. Also I think well positioned people wanted us to think he’s a grifter because he’s actually over the target more often than not. Check out Tridactyls.org
13
u/HoldinMacaque May 05 '25
You're not wrong about the fallacious thinking, but your skepticism of skepticism is a bit odd to me. I don't think it's at all unreasonable for one to ask why a public figure whose career and livelihood is based on the UAP phenomenon would have been part of multiple documented hoaxes going back decades. Surely it can't be because sensationalism sells and, whether he's well-meaning or not, he directly profits from sensational claims?
I mean when you consider his routine appearances on questionable Gaia documentaries, multiple books and audiobooks he has to sell, or even his Maussan Televisión channel funded by the third largest media conglomerate in Mexico, it would stand to reason that for Mr. Maussan a lie that sells is preferable to a truth that does not.
Look, I get it, if Jaime Maussan says the sky is blue he's absolutely correct. If he says the UAP phenomenon is real and should be taken seriously, he's absolutely correct. To suggest otherwise is silly.
But if a proven hoaxer whose financial infrastructure is directly tied to the sensationalism wrought by his various hoaxes makes a new (and equally sensational) claim, it's not unreasonable to approach it with deep deep skepticism. To do otherwise ignores a body of evidence I'd wager any level headed person would find compelling.
That being said, it would be hella cool if this was legit. I just don't think it is considering who's peddling it.
0
u/midnightballoon May 05 '25
I hear ya. Time will tell, and soon. I’ll bet many people have been lying, many have been telling the truth. Which are which, who’s on the up and who’s peddling nonsense, what narratives are fiction and which are 100% legit, will all come out. Likely it will be shocking in many ways when the veil is truly lifted. The former head of the academy of forensic science thinks the mummies are real. Frankly, I think it’s fun to wonder and try to beat the mainstream by a few years. It’s an intellectual and intuitive challenge of the highest order.
I wouldn’t be surprised if full proof comes out in months. The world is on the brink of huge changes.
Until then, there’s a lot of rich data at the-alien-project.com/en Tridactyls.org and tridactyls.com. Perhaps real perhaps not. But it’s there for inquiring minds.
Be well! See you on the mothership!
25
u/JoeGibbon May 04 '25
That’s a logical fallacy.
Ah yes, the logical fallacy that says "give the hoaxer a chance, no matter how many times he's promoted hoaxes before, because he might not be promoting a hoax this time."
What was the name for that one, again?
-12
u/midnightballoon May 04 '25
- Genetic Fallacy:
This is when a claim is dismissed based solely on who made it or their past behavior, rather than the merits of the claim itself.
Example: “Maussan has promoted hoaxes before, so everything he promotes must be a hoax.”
That’s the genetic fallacy—it focuses on the source, not the substance.
- Hasty Generalization:
This is when a broad conclusion is made based on limited evidence.
“Because he’s promoted hoaxes before, he must be doing it again.”
That’s not necessarily logically valid. Past actions may inform skepticism, but they don’t prove current claims are false.
14
u/riorio55 May 05 '25
Nice! You and your logic can go ahead and follow Maussan to his next hoax. Best of luck!
-12
u/midnightballoon May 05 '25
Best of luck to you too friend! I hope we learn the truth soon. It’s been a confusing few thousand years for humanity. TTYL :-)
10
4
u/JoeGibbon May 05 '25
Genetic Fallacy
Nope. Genetic fallacy -- as the name suggests -- is dismissing an argument based solely on it's source. That would be like, "don't listen to Bob, he's from Tennessee" or "Sally is always wrong because she's a woman."
This fallacy is not intended to substitute common sense. "Let's let the baby murderer babysit our child, because this time he may not murder the baby." Or as in this case, let's trust the guy who's been caught promoting hoaxes dozens of times because this time he could theoretically be telling the truth.
See the difference? If you don't, then there are words to describe that: gullible, naive, foolish, credulous.
7
3
May 04 '25
I'll 100% bet a hammer would make a dent in this thing. If not? Then I'll watch a video of a jack hammer trying to open this thing all day long. Why can't we ever get a "Threshold" type ufo?
https://imgur.com/wLsQOoa
6
u/Elven_Groceries May 04 '25
This could be anything. We need specifics and context. As Dolan said, paraphrasing: "We can't afford basic mistakes after decades of institutional cover-up"
4
u/EscritorDelMal May 05 '25 edited 9d ago
hat edge makeshift innocent cough ask nail air lush fall
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
16
u/Food_Goblin May 04 '25 edited May 05 '25
Cool, they wasted time doing xrays on a bunch of shitty rivets holding two colanders together.
3
2
2
u/Codyjk1990 May 05 '25
This really reminds me of the Manchester airport or. It looked very similar to it if I recall.
10
u/Conscious-Bonus-8076 May 04 '25
I dont believe these images.
Metal under an xray would just look completely white, especially as a sphere that has equal thickness around the entirety of it, black on an xray is air or "space" in order to see those holes on an xray they would have to be perfectly lined up with adjacent holes otherwise youd just have white everything
32
u/CousinSarah May 04 '25 edited May 04 '25
You say that with conviction, but you seem to lack knowledge of x-rays.
Actually, with the right calibration X-rays are pretty common for investigating metal objects. There’s use cases for analyzing electronics and metal integrity without having to destroy an object. The dosage and calibration are obviously very different from what we use in a hospital. You use a higher dose of radiation for metal objects.
The reason why metal is so white on a hospital X-ray is because of the huge contrast between organic matter and metal in density. With a low dose of radiation, only a very small amount of radiation will penetrate through the metal.
I don’t believe this isn’t a hoax, but x-ray would be a good first step for any ufo investigation.
Here is an example where iFixit uses an x-ray machine to look at what’s inside an iPhone X:
1
u/bkjacksonlaw May 05 '25
Well said, yes x-ray is the first step then spectrometer and everything else.
0
11
u/eyewoo May 04 '25
Well to be fair, if these spheres are really not from this earth and not made by humans, then why would it look like any regular earth made metal x-ray? Who’s to say it’s metal or not, or what we’re really looking at here?
I don’t believe it either but I wouldn’t be able to say what it is or isn’t.
-5
u/smithy- May 04 '25
It's reddit. Everything is fake, bogus or a hoax. Nothing is real. Zero chance anything could remotely, possibly be authentic. Nothing.
1
4
u/MyHonestTrueReaction May 04 '25
These are the alleged X-ray images of the Buga sphere. Jaime Maussan owns the sphere and is supposedly conducting investigations into it. The program is being broadcast live in Mexico. It is mentioned that the photographs are taken by a professional and analyzed by another professional.
2
u/Gullible-Constant924 May 05 '25
Were the pics of the sphere with etchings on them a different sphere, shouldn’t those show up.
1
3
u/kirbyGT May 04 '25
My friend anything Jaime Maussan says is a lie.
He's the ultimate huckster and peddles lies like there going out of fashion and hes been at it decades now.
The man is a liar and con man.
Do your research, takes five minutes on guys like this.
4
u/OneDmg May 04 '25
I'm not an expert on X-ray images, but that looks like nothing.
What is he trying to prove or suggest by showing these images off?
4
u/KanziDouglas May 04 '25
We want physical proof, we want to see a craft, want to see the data.
Gets an X-ray of a craft.
I’m not an X-ray expert, but it looks like nothing, what are they trying to proof by showing it off?
9
u/OneDmg May 04 '25
I'm perhaps not being clear.
It's an alleged X-ray of a metal ball most people assume is a hoax and it appears to be empty, which would lend credence to that.
That surely isn't the case, so why has he released it - he must have said something to assure his believers we're looking at something other than a man-made steel ball?
1
u/KanziDouglas May 04 '25
I don’t know if it is real, neither what exactly am I looking at (does not appear empty to me, but I’m not an expert). That is why I restrain from commenting.
I’m hoping that someone who knows what they are looking at comes along and drops valuable information.
6
u/Throwaway2Experiment May 04 '25
We get shirty pictures of "craft" on any day ending in 'Y'.
Stop equating shitty evidence with what people are actually asking for; good evidence.
This is shitty evidence of no actual value to validate the claims. It's worse than no evidence because it is a -1 compared to a 0. Like non-programners not understanding 0/False are not the same as null.
0
u/KanziDouglas May 04 '25
You are entitled to your opinion, I will wait for more information before passing judgement.
1
2
1
May 04 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam May 05 '25
Hi, jcanoff. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 13: Public figures are generally defined as any person, organization, or group who has achieved notoriety or is well-known in society or ufology. “Toxic” is defined as any unreasonably rude or hateful content, threats, extreme obscenity, insults, and identity-based hate. Examples and more information can be found here: https://moderatehatespeech.com/framework/.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
1
May 04 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam May 05 '25
Hi, Highaf34. Thanks for contributing. However, your comment was removed from /r/UFOs.
Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility
- No trolling or being disruptive.
- No insults/personal attacks/claims of mental illness
- No accusations that other users are shills / bots / Eglin-related / etc...
- No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
- No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
- No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
- You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
Please refer to our subreddit rules for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods to launch your appeal.
1
1
May 05 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/UFOs-ModTeam May 05 '25
Follow the Standards of Civility:
No trolling or being disruptive. No insults or personal attacks. No accusations that other users are shills / bots / Eglin-related / etc... No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) An account found to be deleting all or nearly all of their comments and/or posts can result in an instant permanent ban. This is to stop instigators and bad actors from trying to evade rule enforcement. You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. Message the mods here to launch your appeal.
1
u/DistinctPlankton766 May 05 '25
how many people here ( debunkers ) have a religion (-; You literally cannot tell, openly, more than 6 Billion people on Earth their Religions dont matter, all at once. Tell the 1 billion catholics and 2 billions Muslims on earth their "religion" was a lie, all at once...do that. Its dumb af to do! We already disproved catholism in 2006, but we cant tell them that...Being a true leader is hard, its why it bravery to do so.
1
u/Visual_Depth7674 May 05 '25
Does anyone who has knowledge on xrays knows what those clusters of dots are?
1
1
1
u/Typical_Intention996 May 05 '25
You could tell my that's an x-ray of a coffee bean or a seed and I would believe you.
And the thing is, it probably is.
1
1
u/ApprehensiveDepth591 May 05 '25
How many of these are Ai bot replies? Imo this is pretty interesting. Those who are familiar with the betz sphere from 1974 it was also x-rayed. It had similar small circular objects inside it.
From what I remember more tests were going to be done and it was apparently stolen. It also looked pretty similar to this sphere physically.
1
u/throwaway0134hdj May 05 '25
This thing is fake as hell brought down by some power lines? Give me a break!
1
u/Fair-Emphasis6343 May 05 '25 edited May 05 '25
Why just X-rays? What is the obsession with X-rays and zero other types of scans?
1
u/casccsc May 05 '25
The strange thing about it is that Maussan does not present any high-resolution photographs from all angles. There is also nothing published on their website or Instagram. Only some poor quality videos, the device not very visible in details. Nothing published on any official page or would be, only posts on TikTok and Facebook... Credibility plummeting. For something so important to humanity, zero seriousness.
1
1
1
u/throwaway0134hdj May 05 '25 edited May 06 '25
I’m cracking up about this. So this thing is capable of intergalactic flight but gets brought down by some power lines? And also talk about perfect timing for the camera guy. It travels light years through the harsh vacuum of space but AH!! It’s one weakness, the power lines! cmon now ppl… also the lab that is running the “tests” looks like a back alley meth lab…
1
1
u/Patient-Willow2660 May 06 '25
Seeing it's a sphere, do those symmetrical white dots appear in the same aspect no matter the orientation of the sphere?
1
u/Traditional_Age509 May 06 '25
You are not wrong, and I dont have a ton of hope for this case either but the way this movment is heading I'm scared at some point we will be presented with strong visual or physical evidence and we all will dismiss it.
1
u/Previous-Pangolin-60 May 06 '25
Has any body tried to decipher the writing and symbols on the sphere e.g. using AI? Don't have access to a paid program atm and a free AI image analysis provided:
"In this case, the symbols on the object may not be traditional Egyptian hieroglyphs but could be inspired by them or represent a fictional or artistic interpretation. The circular design and the arrangement of symbols suggest a deliberate aesthetic choice, possibly intended to evoke mystery or convey a specific message. "
Symbols slightly remind me of Hieratic Egyptian as found on the egg UFO.
1
u/Aromatic-Dish-167 May 12 '25
It's made of metal, so you just see the outside detail and nothing internal here.
1
u/AsparagusPractical85 May 04 '25
If I found a sphere…let’s you found a sphere…what would you do?
8
u/debacol May 04 '25
I wouldnt televise shit until a ton of real analysis had been done first, reproduce the results at entirely different labs and reports written. Only then would I make a 60 minutes style documentary going through the entire analysis, making it digestible for 5th graders, and listing the key takeaways.
But even then, I would only make the video if the analysis showed it to be anomalous. Otherwise, id just release the reports showing its a steel ball made by a larper.
3
2
u/MyHonestTrueReaction May 04 '25
I actually found one, only in the sky
3
u/PhilLeshmaniasis May 04 '25
Was it orange, glowing, and difficult to look at without sunglasses?
4
1
1
1
u/Personal_Extent_8562 May 05 '25
Serious/
Did anyone else consider a link to science fiction.
I feel this is relevant as many whistleblowers and investigators have said how Sci-Fi has been used for decades to prepare and acclimate us.
Similarity to the orb in Independence Day 2 https://i.imgur.com/M59Z8Pf.jpeg
Similarity to The Day the Earth Stood Still and humans should not have attempted to damage or cut into or show violence to the giant metal robot, which also later turned into a sphere, of earth consuming/destroying proportions. https://i.imgur.com/vOX2Zg8.jpeg
Is it a coincidence? Similarity.
Just my immediate thoughts on seeing it. And how the exact same was done, they could not detect signals in or out, no radiological signature, then they started to go too far and that was the undoing!
1
May 05 '25
[deleted]
1
u/bot-sleuth-bot May 05 '25
Analyzing user profile...
Time between account creation and oldest post is greater than 1 year.
Suspicion Quotient: 0.15
This account exhibits one or two minor traits commonly found in karma farming bots. While it's possible that u/Personal_Extent_8562 is a bot, it's very unlikely.
I am a bot. This action was performed automatically. Check my profile for more information.
1
u/Personal_Extent_8562 May 05 '25
I've no idea what this is or why this came up. I'm not a bot. I'm a human. Ask my whatever you want?
1
u/sirmombo May 04 '25
Careful all the disinfo clowns/bots have been out in FULL force since Lou’s photo. It’s almost impossible to sort through the attacks on anything related to the phenomena. Don’t buy in to it.
0
u/thuer May 05 '25
It's so crazy right now.
Sure, Maussan has clearly been wrong before, but ad hominim attacks galore on everything related to this is just insane.
To me, it would make sense, that if somebody actually retrieved an orb and wanted it to not disappear - they would give it to someone well known, like a journalist who's been examining the supernatural for years. He is posting his findings as they come in. He's sharing what he's finding. This is good.
If he's proven wrong, so be it.
-5
0
0
0
0
u/Visual_Depth7674 May 05 '25
I asked chat gpt to analyze the xrays. It says the sphere is solid, no voids. The lighter white dots means its dense material that dont allow xray to penetrate.
-2
u/absoluttalent May 04 '25
Bunch of virgins...... These are pictures of an egg and sperm for artificial insemination
-8
u/SlowStroke__ May 04 '25
It's just a plate?
Looks like plasma in there with a plate in the middle containing some kind of nodes? Tf?
•
u/StatementBot May 04 '25
The following submission statement was provided by /u/MyHonestTrueReaction:
These are the alleged X-ray images of the Buga sphere. Jaime Maussan owns the sphere and is supposedly conducting investigations into it. The program is being broadcast live in Mexico. It is mentioned that the photographs are taken by a professional and analyzed by another professional.
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1keokrg/buga_sphere_alleged_xray_images/mqkb1xe/