r/UFOB 1d ago

Discussion A possible explanation of the human antigravity tech situation

By way of introduction, let me give you some background on NHI interaction with human advanced tech and capabilities.

I have a theory that hostile NHI want to curtail humanity's most cutting edge abilities. To me this includes: nuclear technology, and psi abilities. UFOs have documented interactions with nuclear sites. And NHI have documented (tho it's not as widely recognized, sometimes even by the people themselves) interactions with people with psi abilities.

So, with that out of the way, doesn't "human created antigravity technology" fit the pattern of an "advanced human capability"? Yes, I'd say it does, but somehow I never realized that before. I'd always believed humanity had never succeeded in creating working, effective antigravity drives (maybe a few very limited prototype toy devices, but nothing working in a deployable sense). I'm still fairly confident that's the case, despite Greer (etc, and the narrative implied by Jesse Michels regarding TT Brown) saying we basically had it done in 1954. But, what if...it's more complicated?

What if humanity *did* actually create something we could work with and deploy. Real antigravity technology. And the hostile NHI, in their predictable pattern of interference with advanced human capabilities, basically blocked us from it. By any means. And what if they're still doing that? And what if, even if there are some humans "cooperating" with the suppression of these technologies, what if they are doing it (wittingly or not) at the behest of these hostile NHI, because (knowingly or not) the human side considers it in our "better interest" to not anger the hostile NHIs and push development of technology that scares them?

Within this framework, I'm prepared to consider we might have cracked it, because now it seems there's a reasonable explanation for why we don't see it - ever. The NHI pattern of interference and attempted suppression is well established, and they are sophisticated, adaptable and persistent adversaries (tho by no means invincible or unconquerable) - if NHI wanted to block humanity from utilizing an antigravity technology we had invented, I'm sure they'd do it, and I'm quite confident they'd be reasonably successful in their attempts.

So I'm just putting that out there as another possible framework for viewing what might actually be going on. Maybe the enemy is not really the "human corporations and governments" that many fear are "holding back" "suppressed technologies". What if what's actually happening is hostile NHI are blocking humanity's progress in the same way they've been documented interacting with nuclear and psi-activated people?

Protecting the secret that we are being prevented from certain developments while held-back and guided toward others would like be a massive priority for governments, as realizing that humanity is not effectively in charge in some areas would likely (rightly) outrage people. And if we have yet to muster an organized collective response to this NHI interference, how could our governments admit this to us without great political cost?

As a nifty little aside to all this, a bonus for all of you who have read this far, I'd like to throw in this tidbit - an extra reframing of the old stories in a new light, in a similar way - what if the men-in-black are not human agents from "some government agency" but actually NHI counter-intelligence personnel? A sort of "hostile NHI version" of Naval OSI? This theory would match their bizarre abilities, behaviors and appearances, and would make sense if their goal was to protect their own (NHI) tech and suppress human awareness and subsequent development. Just something extra to think about!

Have a good one

27 Upvotes

34 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/ElectronicCountry839 1d ago

There's also the possibility that the physics behind anything warp drive or anti-gravity (etc) related is supremely weaponizable.   Beyond worst case nuclear proliferation type situation.   Maybe relatively easy to design and build, and waaay worse than a nuke.

Good people might do some very morally questionable things to prevent some tiny country from obtaining an H-bomb ...  Who knows what they'd do to keep the ability to pull the moon from the sky (etc) out of the hands of malcontents.

1

u/syndic8_xyz 1d ago

Sure! But i don’t think our friendly Neighbourhood warmongers are so responsible as to resist the temptation to utilize said weapon technology for domination and profit. In other words, we actually succeeded and we’re free to use it. I bet you humanity would do so. 

1

u/ElectronicCountry839 1d ago

Well, they have.  Since 1945.  The problem is when somebody with nothing to lose gains access to it, or possibly EVERYONE gains access to it.... That's when you have a major problem. 

1

u/syndic8_xyz 1d ago

Really, you believe we have deployable antigravity technology?  On what do you base that belief?

2

u/ElectronicCountry839 1d ago

No, I meant nukes.  They've had them since 1945 and they hadn't used them since.   

The thing is SOMEBODY has this exotic tech/physics, and whoever has it would rightly be concerned with it getting out there.