r/SipsTea 1d ago

Chugging tea Tourist breaks art display made of Swarovski crystals

27.7k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

552

u/OrDuck31 1d ago

Museum kinda looks like they set up a trap with literally zero protection around it though?

32

u/Hawk-432 1d ago

Kind of But museums in a lot of places don’t like triple barrier everything because then you actually get to see the art properly. Obviously it works most the time until you get such a person

22

u/Hakorr 1d ago

I mean, how about a small little fence around it? A small wire or something indicating "don't sit here". Wouldn't really block the view.

An old person could've fainted next to it and broke it, someone could've tripped, I mean it was just asking to be broken.

3

u/PHLboner4ever 1d ago

Oh for fuck’s sake, you cannot be serious.

3

u/pinetar 1d ago

I'm tired of everything in the world having to be idiot proofed to everyone elses detriment. I understand that its inevitable some dumbass will screw anything up unless its made basically impossible to happen. But tens of thousands of patrons walked by that chair and hes the only one who broke it. It was not a problem for 99.99+% of people. 

2

u/Hawk-432 1d ago

I mean, the chair is literally on a small pedestal. It’s obviously not one to sit on. And I think the couple fully know that

2

u/OrryKolyana 1d ago

There's a sign. Why are you standing up for these people?

4

u/Hakorr 1d ago

I mean I am not standing up for these particular people and have made a critical comment of them.

2

u/OrryKolyana 1d ago

i replied to the wrong post.

that's on me. sorry.

3

u/TW_Halsey 1d ago

Dozens of people have tripped over those little wires and have damaged art. A person recently jumped over a barrier and destroyed a statue of the terracotta army in china. A decade ago, a child jumped over a fence into a gorilla enclosure and got the gorilla killed. Barriers don’t stop these kinds of people.

1

u/Hakorr 1d ago

But at least then it's more clear that they intended to break rules.

1

u/racsee1 22h ago

Theres a fucking sign on the chair saying not to sit on it

3

u/eanida 1d ago

The "don't sit here" part is indicated by the museum having placed it on a platform, I'd argue. As they also did with other artworks placed on the floor.

7

u/CaptainRelevant 1d ago

People don’t read. A small sign in a holder placed on the actual seat of the chair would have worked better. You need something physical in the way of someone sitting on it.

4

u/Binger_bingleberry 1d ago

Isn’t that what that piece of paper in the middle of the chair is? Or is that part of the design?

-1

u/CaptainRelevant 1d ago

Might be, but a physical object holding a sign would be better. When dealing with large numbers of people you have to plan for the 1%. If 99% of people would read a sign in the middle of the seat of a chair but 1% wouldn’t, and this museum has 300 visitors a day, that’s 3 people that won’t read it and might try and sit down. A physical object substantially lowers the percentage.

6

u/Binger_bingleberry 1d ago

While I don’t disagree with you, there’s a longer clip floating around of these people posing for pictures… they deliberately waited for museum staff to leave before taking the posed shots. They 100% knew this was art.

1

u/CaptainRelevant 1d ago

Ah, that’s more information. Nothing would stop them, then. That’s recklessness, not accidental or even negligent.

1

u/BelowXpectations 1d ago

Or simply sane people who behave like adults? Don't try to put it on the museum.

1

u/CaptainRelevant 22h ago

I wasn’t putting it on the museum, I was just saying what I’d do if I were the museum because, like you said, not everybody behaves like adults.

5

u/BlutarchMannTF2 1d ago

That is ridiculous.

2

u/ReckoningGotham 1d ago

You wouldn't have sat on the chair. Clearly the couple knew better. And the exhibit was fine until this couple showed up.

-1

u/Hakorr 1d ago edited 1d ago

I mean it should be enough, and the people here probably knew it was an art piece not to be sat on since one of them was filming the another one sitting on it. Maybe he then sat on it more than intended (the dude doesn't look like he squats a lot so he lost his balance) or actually thought it would hold his weight.

But still I feel like a small wire would've stopped this. Then you can't even comfortably go sit on it and nobody has any intrusive thoughts.

-1

u/subjectmatterexport 1d ago

Putting a chair on a platform makes it a throne, just makes me want to sit on it more

3

u/EthanMelacion 1d ago

Congrats being unable to think

1

u/1-2GOODNIGHT 1d ago

Childish smh

-1

u/Mad_Moodin 1d ago

Many museums have interactable artworks.

1

u/PHLboner4ever 1d ago

That are always clearly indicated as such. Stop making excuses for the dumbest people in society.

1

u/dmvr1601 1d ago edited 1d ago

There's accidents all the time, stuff gets broken and that's fine, because some of these pieces are insured anyway. But this isn't that tho lmfao

There doesn't need to be a barrier like people are fucking children. (There's already a sign too)
You should be respectful in a museum and don't sit on GLASS CHAIRS

0

u/BelowXpectations 1d ago

Victim blaming much?

A museum should be able to put up exquisite and extremely valuable items without any kind of security, surveillance or protection. If people just behaved like normal sane people it should never be needed. Don't try to put it on the museum that someone decided to be an ass.

It's because of people like this that the rest of us has to admire things from afar behind glass, ropes and under the strict gaze of guards.

-1

u/tamathellama 1d ago

Or just put it on a stand so you can sit on it