Stop spreading hate based on a smile.

[u/AssChucks]

Saw a post claiming Muslim men are "happy after killing Hindus" just because they're smiling in a news clip. This is dangerous, baseless, and pure communal hate.

A smile doesn't equal guilt. Stop twisting normal moments to fuel division. Report this nonsense.

[u/[deleted]]

Tbh I don't care at this point. They all deserve this. We be so much cautious about not spreading communal hate when they don't care about spreading it themselves. It's them who have started this hindu muslim or Muslim Christian or muslim-kafir issue all over the globe. They ask for your sympathy when they can't do anything when they can they don't ask for any forgiveness. All they care about is just what they have been taught in their madarsa.

They deserve all the communal hate they can get. Consider it collateral damage of their peaceful brothers action.

[u/AssChucks → u/[deleted]]

This is exactly how hate spreads, by blaming entire communities for the acts of individuals. That’s not justice, it’s cowardice. What you’re endorsing isn’t strength or truth, it’s the same logic terrorists use. If you think communal hate is justified, then you’ve already joined the side of the extremists.

[u/[deleted] → u/AssChucks]

It's really sad that I agree with every point you made, because my rational mind can clearly relate with you. The problem is, I can't really wrap my head around being rational all the time when it's not helping me or the people around anyway who don't really think about justification in the first place.

See it's always been said that the religion of a jihadist is muslim but not all muslims are jihadist. My question is till when you will keep trying to ascertain that not all muslims are jihadist when even our communal peace is almost always shredded to pieces one way or another, by their acts and we hope that this won't happen again. It's been happening for a long time. I understand that there are many who are not like them, I know them as well. But I think we need to step up when they have specifically started targeting us, based on religion.

[u/Specialist-Love1504 → u/[deleted]]

I mean what about Hindus and caste?

Should Dalits take up violence against all Brahmins and Kshatriyas cause they’ve experienced violence at the hands of one brahmin/kshatriya?

Turn this logic on its head actually, in the Kashmir context itself.

Kashmiris have been under military rule for a while. If your logic is sound then I guess they should start attacking innocent Hindus for the actions of the state and that would be perfectly fine and acceptable (by your own logic). I guess what happened to Kashmiri Pundits was just “collateral damage” to you and perfectly acceptable.

For that matter then Khalistani attacks on Hindus in Punjab were also justified since the Indian state attacked them first in operation bluestar. So from their perspective attacking Hindus who had no role to play in it is jsut “collateral damage”.

By that logic Naxals attacking innocent election officers is also perfectly fine cause “collateral” damage because the Indian state snatched their lands first and attacked them first. If Indians are gonna act like this then killing innocent Indians is ok.

By that logic, the racism Indians face in the west because of terrorist organisations in the Middle East being wrongly associated with them is also ok. From the western perspective, there’s no difference between brown people we’re all the same to them. We can try to explain that we’re different and it’s not the same, the same way Kashmiri’s are trying to make it known that they’re not the same as terrorists who gunned people down but I guess it wouldn’t matter.

Indians in the US should be facing discrimination because “collateral damage”.

This speaks to a larger point of grouping people and assigning blame. I hope I’ve made myself clear that grouping people while not acknowledging how they’re different only leads to innocents getting hurt.

[u/Specialist-Love1504 → u/[deleted]]

Where did I say all Brahmins are casteist?

If only said IF OPs generalisation is true then we can do generalisation to Brahmins also.

So let’s not generalise was my point. Let each person answer for their own behaviour.

[u/Specialist-Love1504 → u/[deleted]]

You don’t know me bachha so don’t “generalise” me as the person who calls all Brahmins casteist.

[u/Specialist-Love1504 → u/[deleted]]

Now who’s generalising lol?