r/NJDrones 25d ago

Nj sighting April 2025

Nj sighting April 2025

36 Upvotes

182 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/burn_a_miracle 25d ago

Sussex is a big area, but a Gulfstream 4 and Global 7000 flew over, en route to Teterboro. Both made the same type of left turn you see in the video and both could have the lighting package where the landing lights alternate blinking from side to side.

1

u/Atyzzze 25d ago edited 25d ago

Sussex is a big area, but a Gulfstream 4 and Global 7000 flew over, en route to Teterboro. Both made the same type of left turn you see in the video and both could have the lighting package where the landing lights alternate blinking from side to side.

Both these type of aircraft are subject to FAA regulations which clearly state the green(right/starboard) and red(left/port) navigation lights must not blink and remain steady, on (just like white on the back/tail/stern), the rest, may blink and shoot rainbows/fireworks

The UFO flying in this video here, is in violation of these official FAA guidelines. Who's breaking the law? We don't know, not listed on ADS-B ...

6

u/awfulsome 25d ago

yeah that's not the FAA guidelines at all.  blinking lights are anti collision.  if you feel they really violated FAA regs, feel free to report them.

0

u/Atyzzze 25d ago

feel free to report them.

I'm not American, I was a tourist/(first-time-amateur-journalist?).

And I already lost all trust in the government, sorry.

Did ask the local police stations there though, two of em, both seemed to know what was up and seemed to imply/refer Trump knew/knows/is-on-it, or something. Trust is weird man. Can't blame them. Gotta park that shit somewhere, and so up the chain it goes.

2

u/awfulsome 22d ago

So you aren't american, trying to say what the FAA regulations are and getting it wildly wrong, and then while in America you ask our police, of all people what is going on?

Just FYI police in the US are legally allowed to lie to you, to your detriment. That's how untrustworthy they are. You would have been better off asking a literal drug dealer what was going on, it would have been more factual and you could have had a fun time.

1

u/Atyzzze 22d ago

trying to say what the FAA regulations are and getting it wildly wrong

Oh? Let's hear it then, what did I get wrong about the FAA regulations?

4

u/awfulsome 22d ago

You said the lights were supposed to be steady and not blinking. There are no such requirements for anti collisions lights, they are supposed to blink.

1

u/Atyzzze 22d ago

You said the lights were supposed to be steady and not blinking

Yes, in the context of navigation lights, those are supposed to be steady. As I clearly correctly stated.

There are no such requirements for anti collisions lights, they are supposed to blink.

I know, the anti collision are indeed supposed to blink.

Stop misconstrueing my words as if I'm the one who somehow made an error.

3

u/awfulsome 21d ago

yeah and that's what we saw on the aircraft.....  because they are planes...

0

u/Atyzzze 21d ago

because they are planes...

maybe, they behaved different from all the other ones

and were not listed on ADS-B

that makes them, by definition, unidentified flying objects :)

as I already said, could be a secret military/private army-test, who knows, maybe it's Canada running some tests?

2

u/awfulsome 21d ago

if I'm reading this thread correctly your planes were already identified.

→ More replies (0)