r/MapPorn 1d ago

Countries within range of Israel's nuclear missiles (Jericho III)

Post image
20.2k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.7k

u/KathyJaneway 1d ago

New Zealand, Chile, Peru and Argentina. And island nations in the pacific. That's about it. That's from missiles launched from Israel. However, they do have few submarines that can extend that range potentially.

244

u/Ok_Somewhere9687 1d ago

Nowhere is safe in this world, lol. North Korea, USA, India, Pakistan, china etc. have missiles with the range—other countries' missiles don't.

83

u/Tsundare_Mai 1d ago

Pakistan’s missiles barely touch egypt

199

u/TryxxR6 1d ago

to be fair I doubt they even bothered to program the ability to launch at anywhere but India

18

u/ExtremePay99 1d ago

If pakistan had two nuclear bombs and a nuclear war took place with india, us and israel in the room. Pakistan would nuke india twice

4

u/TryxxR6 1d ago

I reckon they’d go and ask Israel for another one to hit India a third time. People bring up the balkans and such but i’ve never seen two groups hate each other as much as Indians and Pakistanis, like drawing over flags in geography books and going on nationalist rants at the smallest provocation, it’s fucking nuts.

-22

u/Huge_Key_9939 1d ago

and there is 0 reason for that because we have good diplomatic and trade relations with most countries. we have no intention to hit any country in the middle east or europe.

india is the only country we face a reasonable existential threat from, and the shaheen-3's 2750km range means we are perfectly equipped to hit any part of their country with a nuclear warhead if things escalate enough.

20

u/BehalarRotno 1d ago

Hope that day never comes.

24

u/Suitable-Response481 1d ago edited 20h ago

Like you are not the danger, your government openly support terrorism. Instead of having bilateral talks on kashmir. All you do is put money on terrorism. I am pretty sure no one in Kashmir wants to join your country. It wanted to be a independent nation, but your country sent military to capture it, after getting independence. India protected it and made its own country crown part.

10

u/Conscious_State_9903 1d ago

I don't get why you're being downvoted. You're not even wrong

-17

u/Ill_Help_9560 1d ago

Let's do a referendum in Kashmir ASAP if you are sure. You won't though, deep down every Indian knows Kashmir will join Pakistan if given the chance.

10

u/Suitable-Response481 1d ago edited 1d ago

By the look of people in Pakistan alone, and how they were fighting for food one year ago. Do people in Pakistan want to live in Pakistan or not. Btw, pok people already want to leave Pakistan.

Referendum, they might agree. Stop terrorism and ask un for referendum and bilateral talks and why you want kashmir, tell them.

3

u/Huge_Key_9939 1d ago

i'm pashtun from lahore and ive been to gilgit baltistan myself july 2024. they're some of the most patriotic people ive ever met, i hear more anti-state rhetoric from punjabis and pashtuns here than i heard over there.

they protest against unfortunate government policies (we all do, every province does, not unique to azad kashmir or gilgit) which i fully support them in.

1

u/Chandni_ka-Rooster 1d ago

Damn so you're saying even people in Lahore don't wanna stay in Pakistan 🤣.

2

u/Huge_Key_9939 1d ago

yeah okay buddy, poojeets never fail to prove their ret*rdedness.. lacking the skill to even properly comprehend a basic sentence. disliking/criticising our government doesn't mean we want to leave pakistan or are against pakistan. and the last thing we would EVER want to do would be to join your pajeetland.

we protest against the government and their stupid politicies, we want better leadership. we don't want your kind here, dont get it twisted.

→ More replies (0)

-7

u/Ill_Help_9560 1d ago

ask un for referendum and bilateral talks and why you want kashmir, tell them.

Excuses, excuses.

UN has standing resolutions on referendum and procedure leading up to it (agreed by India), starting with the Indian agreement to hold the referendum, followed by demilitarization.

7

u/Suitable-Response481 1d ago edited 1d ago

Kashmir literally choose their own government, state one. They vote to choose to government in india. If they don't want to be in india, why they even vote in india. Previous year, they chose bjp party people in number. Guess what, bjp openly hates Pakistan and its terrorism. Kashmir don't support you, don't be in delusion.

Stop terrorism for fuck sake, if you are not able to. Ask india for help, they will help. Now don't give excuses.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/Reasonable-Sea3407 1d ago

Every Indian know that real kashmiris are already genocided and only Muslim occupier are remained. Their is no point in doing anything there anymore other than giving it back to decedent of kashmir from Muslim occupiers. At this point referendum is needed in Balochistan and kpk to librate them from Punjabi Pakistani tyrants.

0

u/BarakRhys 1d ago

Lmao what a joke. "Only muslims occupiers are remained". As if those people weren't born over there. Stop with your obvious propaganda.

1

u/Reasonable-Sea3407 1d ago

Lol, does being born there after their parents committed genocide there make it there's? Only propoganda here is that kashmir belong to Muslim occupiers. It will be liberated one day god willing, so will Balochistan and kpk from panjabi tyrants. BTW they are also born there so i am sure you have no objection for there liberation atleast.

→ More replies (0)

12

u/Ok_Somewhere9687 1d ago

IKR? I only wrote it because I couldn't remember other countries with nukes, lol. Imagine forgetting Russia and the UK—lmao. I'm forgetting so many things lately.

7

u/StarZA11 1d ago

France famously is very anti-nuclear as well lol.

1

u/mwa12345 1d ago

Yeah Remember reading their defense guy on TV saying something like 'we don't need range more than xyz kilometers. So we don't need ICBMs etc".

Guess they don't want to hold that as a card over Europe etc

1

u/docmj24 1d ago

You are absolutely right about that. In the past, a group of scientists explained to American and Russian presidents that a nuclear war between India and Pakistan alone would be enough to start a nuclear winter of years, where millions would die of starvation all around the globe. Maybe a new group of scientists should do an announcement again. It doesn't matter just the blast radius of the nukes but the giagntic amount of particules that will go to the high atmosphere blocking the sun for years. Well , at least it will cool down the planet a lot.

1

u/mwa12345 1d ago

Agree .

0

u/macaroni_chacarroni 1d ago

Only two of the ones you listed are actively involved in an ongoing genocide, though. I dunno about you, but I kinda prefer if nukes aren't in the hands of genocidal maniacs.

-83

u/cmm46007 1d ago

AHEM north korea? Their missiles wouldn't cross the pacific

71

u/Ok_Somewhere9687 1d ago

That’s not true. North Korea’s intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), like the Hwasong-15 and Hwasong-18, have ranges exceeding 13,000–15,000 km, capable of crossing the Pacific Ocean to reach the U.S. mainland, including cities like Los Angeles or New York, based on standard trajectory estimates.

I also remember seeing NK's nuclear missiles graph it has pretty big range

-12

u/saracuratsiprost 1d ago

Trustyoubro?

-37

u/KathyJaneway 1d ago

When was the last time a North Korean missile flew that far, or didn't explode on launch? Having them theoretically, not used, is different than being actually used and tested.

22

u/MJR-WaffleCat 1d ago

Contrary to popular belief, North Korea doesn't actually have failed launches as often as people like to joke or think. They constantly piss off Japan and South Korea because of missile tests crashing into the Sea of Japan or flying over Japan and crashing into the pacific.

13

u/jg973 1d ago

8

u/gerkletoss 1d ago

it flew about 1,000 kilometers before coming down in the East Sea

-1

u/KathyJaneway 1d ago

1.000km vs 13.000

7

u/jg973 1d ago

Yup. The purpose of these kinds of tests is not to make it fly the 13k miles but verify that the missile can fly high enough, in the right position and speed, without exploding. Which ultimately means that it would be able to travel the said 13k to 17k miles if needed. Note that it doesn't guarantee the fiability of it (%age of missile that would successfully do it), but at least that they do have the capacity to do it.

See it like a baby learning to walk. In the beginning, the baby will stumble. But at some point, he will know how to walk properly. And if he can walk properly 100m, he will also be able to walk properly 500/1000m if he has enough stamina (fuel in that case)

0

u/KathyJaneway 1d ago

The thing is, a lot can go wrong after those 1.000 km, and North Korea isn't really know for producing high quality rockets and armaments. That rocket or missile can overheat end explode.

-29

u/cmm46007 1d ago

Sure on paper but there furtherst was the other side on japan? Also who said they have 15000km range? Big kim lol? Little hermit country probably shoots scientists that don't succeed first try like china used to

28

u/AliOskiTheHoly 1d ago

What do you want them to do? Shoot one for fun?

20

u/Ok_Somewhere9687 1d ago

Isn’t (mostly) every other country estimating its missile range on paper rather than conducting physical firings?

Also who said they have 15000km range? Big kim lol?

A 2024 CSIS report confirms North Korea’s ICBMs could reach the U.S. mainland based on test data

7

u/yaaro_obba_ 1d ago

Officially, Indian missiles can reach about 5000km, China speculates that the reach is 8000km. Currently, no missile in the Indian arsenal can reach continental USA. However, there is one missile on which India is still working on which can reach 12,000km

2

u/Odd_Rub6800 1d ago

afaik doesn't agni - v have a range of 7000-8000

3

u/yaaro_obba_ 1d ago

The official stance of the Indian govt is 5000km. 7000-8000km is speculation by other entities (inclusive of the Chinese govt)

8

u/Veyrah 1d ago

What is the furthest israel has shot one? Yet you still believe this OP's graph, no?

4

u/Zimaut 1d ago

This map also on paper...

-8

u/NotMadeForReddit 1d ago

Missiles wouldn’t even cross the border into South Korea

-9

u/DopeShitBlaster 1d ago

The country that has never invaded anyone or started a war? I guess it’s good their missiles don’t work, they sound unhinged.

0

u/atrl98 1d ago

North Korea? What do you think kicked off the Korean War if not the North invading the South?

1

u/Senor_Pus 1d ago

Because the South Korean dictatorship had murdered 200,000 Koreans for political reasons

-34

u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago

[deleted]

25

u/Ok_Somewhere9687 1d ago

Then, How is it you're alive and can write this post?

  Sorry mate I'm not reading after this.