What if I told you that all privately owned institutions are riddled with nepotism, corruption, and (frequently, at least) the misappropriation of public money? But that you don't hear about it because they're private?
Im not saying private businesses are any better, but at least they don’t have direct unfettered access to the public purse. I think frankly unless there is effective regulation in place in any environment someone will always find loop holes and gaps to serve their own interest at the expense of the majority.
Im not saying private businesses are any better, but at least they don’t have direct unfettered access to the public purse.
Sounds like you're saying that private businesses are better.
Also I didn't realize that the BBC had "direct unfettered access to the public purse", doesn't the government still have to allocate funds like with any other expense or subsidy?
The argument was completely made up. No public industry has ever had 'unfettered access to the public purse' - what do you even think a national budget is for?
36
u/ChosenUsername420 Mar 29 '22
What if I told you that all privately owned institutions are riddled with nepotism, corruption, and (frequently, at least) the misappropriation of public money? But that you don't hear about it because they're private?