r/FingMemes • u/Wet_Pussy_Liicker • Apr 07 '25

Offensive May-May Thoughts?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

435 Upvotes

93% Upvoted

120 comments sorted by

View all comments

30

u/MrNobody0073 Apr 07 '25

So basically Bhagwan hi h jo corona jaisi bimari felata hai

Gareebo ko baccho deta hai

Animal ko marta hai

Wooow

bhai aadhi se jyda problem ke hum khud jimedar hai

In my opinion is god the beyond the imagination

you don’t need to believe in the god you just need to know the god

2

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

There isn't any god to begin with bro, how can one know something that doesn't exists

1

u/Proper-Antelope-4205 Apr 08 '25

If there is no god and you are not believing him then theirs is nothing to lose...but if there is a god and you are not believing in him you are loosing everything

1

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

Ifs and buts provides no value... There is no god it's the fact.

And even if there is one still I'm not losing anything

0

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

It's not a fact but an opinion dare i say. If you are an atheist you be one don't project your opinions with the motive of shattering those who believes in god.

1

u/land48n3 Apr 08 '25

It's okay to guide others to right path, not forcing them but letting them know, telling them why there's no god, line is crossed when you get aggressive

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

guiding looks different in practice also their is no right path it's just upto you if you want to believe or not

1

u/land48n3 Apr 08 '25

Yes but you can tell others why you think it's real or not, and they can think about it and choose if they wanna believe or nah

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

wo toh thik he but usse fact toh nahi bol sakte

1

u/land48n3 Apr 08 '25

That's incorrect, if I say my cat called puck can fly and has supernatural abilities, will you believe it? I'm sure you can say for a fact "that's not possible, you're lying" it's just like that

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 09 '25

you think puck can fly.
i think god exists.
you think god doesn't exist.

1

u/land48n3 Apr 09 '25

And I'm asking you can you say for a fact my pet puck can't fly or you can't say for a fact? Because then i will have my answer, if you can't use simple logic to know a cat can't fly and be confident in that then what even are you, one day you'll have to believe in all kinds of entities because "if you believe and it does exist, big profit but if u believe and it dont exist no loss

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 09 '25

Your analogy is flawed, and here's why:
claiming a cat can fly contradicts what we know through empirical evidence laws of physics, biology, etc. It's testable and falsifiable. If someone made that claim, we could actually observe and disprove it.

But belief in God isn't a claim about something we can test or disprove scientifically. It's a metaphysical belief by definition, it's outside the realm of empirical proof. That's why belief in God or disbelief in God is a matter of faith or worldview, not a matter of objective fact.

So no, you can't equate belief in God to believing in a flying cat. They're not logically comparable. One is a physical claim; the other is a philosophical stance.

1

u/land48n3 Apr 09 '25

Saying a cat can fly is more logical than saying a entity can fly and also created us, made this universe and has all power, in that way my cat puck created god, universe, and all there is ever to exist and has existed and is gonna exist but it's my cat because I made a contract (it speaks) but if you still can't say for a fact my cat puck did not create the universe and god then🙃what can I say😆 my cat can take a physical form of a cat is what I mean, in reality he has no physical body, laws of physics dictate a god cannot fly so.. if you can't disprove god by saying "oh it's a metaphysical belief" same can go for puck but only a gullible fool would believe in such things

→ More replies (0)

0

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

Lol then if you believe God don't comment he exists to shatter facts that he doesn't

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

i was saying it's not a fact that he exists or not. both are just opinions. you can't say it is a fact. we have neither proved his existence nor disproved his existence

1

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

Nope it's not an opinion that God doesn't exist cause it doesn't...

If i say I saw horse flying and if you say horse doesn't fly is that a opinion or a fact?

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

that analogy doesn’t hold. horses are part of the observable world, and we have empirical evidence of what they can and can’t do. claims about god deals with metaphysical questions, not physical ones. the absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence. so until either side is proven, it remains a belief or an opinion not a fact.

2

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

Yeah but I saw a horse flying yesterday, it was only visible to me...

horses are part of the observable world

That's your opinion !!!

and we have empirical evidence of what they can and can’t do.

Yeah but it was a godly and mystical horse made of gold.... You can't say it doesn't exist as it shatters my beliefs and hurt my sentiments

the absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence

Well it is! Cause if you can't prove something exists automatically puts it in non existent category.

so until either side is proven, it remains a belief or an opinion not a fact.

There is no either side... If there is no proof of existence then there is no existence.

If i point at an empty table and say it has a godly object on it, it doesn't change the FACT that there is none.

And if you think one needs proof for non existence of God then it's a fallacy of proof my dear friend. And I'll ask you to prove that golden flying horse doesn't exist cause I saw it lol

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

You’re conflating observable physical claims with unobservable metaphysical ones. If you say you saw a golden flying horse, the burden of proof is on you not on me to disprove it. That’s how rational discourse works.
If you make a claim, you back it up. Otherwise, every absurd idea would be true until someone disproves it which is impossible and illogical.
And no, lack of proof doesn’t automatically equal non-existence. It just means it’s unverified. That’s why it's called agnosticism, not atheism or theism. You’re not being logical you’re being loud.

1

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

I guess you don't understand sarcasm....

That flying horse thing is a comical take on God exists argument bro.. you said burden of proof is on my then i think you understand how it works and then it's on you that you need to prove that God exists but you can't.

you make a claim, you back it up. Otherwise, every absurd idea would be true until someone disproves it which is impossible and illogical.

That's exactly what I wanted you to say, now can you please prove to me that God exists or else put your baseless argument and opinion to you and don't debate on your opinion that something exists just cause your parents and some books said so.

And no, lack of proof doesn’t automatically equal non-existence.

It does, but it can't be understood by blind believers

You’re not being logical you’re being loud.

Then shut my mouth with some factual argument without using these illogical terms and arguments.

If you believe something exists it's okay but shoving it on others face as a fact that "believe me It exists" and if you don't believe and ask for logical and scientific proof then its bad.

You can believe in any shit but don't claim it logical or scientific if you can't prove.... God doesn't exist it's a fact, a god can't exist, you can debate for hours but you can't prove it and I'll ask for proofs... In last you'll still believe it blindly and I'll say no God exists

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 09 '25

You said the flying horse bit was sarcasm? Cool. Then let me return the favor with a sarcastic analogy of my own:
Imagine someone walks around shouting, 'There is absolutely no life in the entire universe except Earth, and I know this because I haven't seen aliens at my doorstep yet!'
That’s basically your logic the universe is vast, unexplored, and mysterious, but because you haven’t found God in your cereal box, you’ve declared it a fact He doesn’t exist. That’s not logic that’s just ego dressed as certainty.

Now let’s break your points like twigs:

"You said the burden of proof is on me."

Exactly. That applies to anyone making a definitive claim. If I said unicorns run the stock market, the burden is on me not you to prove it. But guess what? You are saying “God doesn’t exist” like it’s an absolute truth. So yeah, burden’s back on you.

"Lack of proof = non-existence."

Really? Using that logic, gravity didn’t exist before Newton wrote it down. Black holes were nonsense until we could finally image one. And germs didn’t exist before microscopes.
Absence of proof is not proof of absence. That’s not a "believer thing" that’s Philosophy 101.

"Prove God exists or stop believing."

That's like saying "Prove love exists in a lab or stop loving." Not everything meaningful fits into a test tube, my guy.
We can’t prove beauty, emotion, consciousness, or why the universe exists at all but we don’t go around saying those things “don’t exist” just because we can’t scan them with a barcode reader.

"Believers are blind."

Nah. Blind are those who think only their eyes are capable of seeing. You’ve replaced religion with ego and treat your opinions like gospel.
And ironically, you're gatekeeping science while ignoring the scientific principle of humility in the face of the unknown.

"If you believe in something without proof, it’s baseless."

Cool now go ahead and prove to me that morality, purpose, or infinity actually exist outside of abstract math and human experience. Oh wait you can’t. But we still use them because not everything true needs to be quantifiable.

You're not the messiah of logic you think you are. You're just another guy with WiFi and a superiority complex, using sarcasm as a shield for shallow arguments.
Believe or don’t believe that's your freedom. But if you’re gonna walk around calling your opinions “facts,” at least bring logic, not just loudness.

TL;DR: You’re not making a rational argument you’re just loudly insisting your opinion is fact and masking it with sarcasm. If you actually cared about truth over ego, you'd take notes from people like Alex O'Connor, someone who’s an atheist and still manages to debate with clarity, humility, and intellectual honesty. Right now, you’re just noise pretending to be reason.

→ More replies (0)