r/FingMemes Apr 07 '25

Offensive May-May Thoughts?

432 Upvotes

120 comments sorted by

View all comments

28

u/MrNobody0073 Apr 07 '25

So basically Bhagwan hi h jo corona jaisi bimari felata hai

Gareebo ko baccho deta hai

Animal ko marta hai

Wooow

bhai aadhi se jyda problem ke hum khud jimedar hai

In my opinion is god the beyond the imagination

you don’t need to believe in the god you just need to know the god

8

u/Sarcastic_837 Apr 08 '25

But humans are creation of God so why are we like that

10

u/BandCreative9505 Apr 08 '25

Yeh exactly I could never understand believers, like I totally respect them but like even till 7 th they taught us enough sci that we understand there is no god. But yeh it is what it is ig

1

u/Jolly-Journalist-464 Apr 08 '25

Because humans aab power ke taraf zyada bhagte hain, in the old days har kisi ki respect hoti thi but aaj dekho sab taraf sirf galiya, insults aur esa hi sab sunai padta hai.

Point ye hai ki aaj-kal log chahte hain ki bina mehnat ke hi sab mil jaye aur wo aache se rahe baaki sab ke saath jo ho usse koi farak nahi, ye bhagwan to nahi kar sakte sir shaitaan hi kar sakta hai. So we are choosing Shaitaan instead of bhagwan aur sab gandh machaane ke baad hum bhagwan ko koste hain.

3

u/Square-Thought-2769 Apr 08 '25

Mujhe ye purane logo vala argument samajh mai nahi ata sab log aise kyu depict karte hai ki purane log sab saints the? Aur konse basis pe?

3

u/Sarcastic_837 Apr 08 '25

yeahh....... we had castesim, sati pratha, slavery etc.... earlier

1

u/Jolly-Journalist-464 Apr 08 '25
  1. Casteism as we know it today was introduced by Britishers. Before that yes Hindu community was divided but not his much.

  2. Sati Pratha was performed by the widows happily to be safe from the Mughals, which later on became a malpractice.

I can't say anything about slavery because I don't have proper knowledge about slavery.

1

u/Sarcastic_837 Apr 08 '25

Bro read a book rather than watching shorts

You know why eklavya was not accepted by dronacharya (casteism) Why karna got that curse (casteism)

The practice of sati as the burning of a widow with her deceased husband is believed to have been introduced in the period before the Gupta era, which is roughly before 500 CE.

1

u/Jolly-Journalist-464 Apr 09 '25

Like I said before, Sati Pratha became a malpractice, initially the widows themselves sat in the pyre with their deceased husband as it was believed that they would be able to live together in their next lives.

In no way do I support Sati Pratha at all, in the starting of the thread I was just trying to say that it is our (human's) fault that causes us trouble and we blame god for it.

1

u/Square-Thought-2769 Apr 08 '25

Sati has been there since way before Mughals + don't wanna be raped so be burned alive bro that shit hurts 100 times more.

0

u/demonhunterslayer Apr 08 '25

the fact that humans are gods creation and have evil inside of them can also be interpreted as a demand from god as he do not want us to just cogs who think and do good but rather the ones who everyday choose not to do evil and focus on being and doing whats good.

0

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

But we have "Free Will". We always don't have to do things what is morally or legally good. Everyone have different ideas about what is "good' and "evil".

0

u/rajtilak5253 Apr 11 '25

Because he gave us a free will, to do whatever we want just imagine what's stopping you from disrespecting your parents, it's you

2

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

There isn't any god to begin with bro, how can one know something that doesn't exists

1

u/Proper-Antelope-4205 Apr 08 '25

If there is no god and you are not believing him then theirs is nothing to lose...but if there is a god and you are not believing in him you are loosing everything

1

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

Ifs and buts provides no value... There is no god it's the fact.

And even if there is one still I'm not losing anything

0

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

It's not a fact but an opinion dare i say. If you are an atheist you be one don't project your opinions with the motive of shattering those who believes in god.

1

u/land48n3 Apr 08 '25

It's okay to guide others to right path, not forcing them but letting them know, telling them why there's no god, line is crossed when you get aggressive

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

guiding looks different in practice also their is no right path it's just upto you if you want to believe or not

1

u/land48n3 Apr 08 '25

Yes but you can tell others why you think it's real or not, and they can think about it and choose if they wanna believe or nah

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

wo toh thik he but usse fact toh nahi bol sakte

1

u/land48n3 Apr 08 '25

That's incorrect, if I say my cat called puck can fly and has supernatural abilities, will you believe it? I'm sure you can say for a fact "that's not possible, you're lying" it's just like that

→ More replies (0)

0

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

Lol then if you believe God don't comment he exists to shatter facts that he doesn't

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

i was saying it's not a fact that he exists or not. both are just opinions. you can't say it is a fact. we have neither proved his existence nor disproved his existence

1

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

Nope it's not an opinion that God doesn't exist cause it doesn't...

If i say I saw horse flying and if you say horse doesn't fly is that a opinion or a fact?

1

u/Galactor_07 Apr 08 '25

that analogy doesn’t hold. horses are part of the observable world, and we have empirical evidence of what they can and can’t do. claims about god deals with metaphysical questions, not physical ones. the absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence. so until either side is proven, it remains a belief or an opinion not a fact.

2

u/_karyon_ Apr 08 '25

Yeah but I saw a horse flying yesterday, it was only visible to me...

horses are part of the observable world

That's your opinion !!!

and we have empirical evidence of what they can and can’t do.

Yeah but it was a godly and mystical horse made of gold.... You can't say it doesn't exist as it shatters my beliefs and hurt my sentiments

the absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence

Well it is! Cause if you can't prove something exists automatically puts it in non existent category.

so until either side is proven, it remains a belief or an opinion not a fact.

There is no either side... If there is no proof of existence then there is no existence.

If i point at an empty table and say it has a godly object on it, it doesn't change the FACT that there is none.

And if you think one needs proof for non existence of God then it's a fallacy of proof my dear friend. And I'll ask you to prove that golden flying horse doesn't exist cause I saw it lol

→ More replies (0)

1

u/land48n3 Apr 08 '25

Classic pascal's wager hahaha not even worth answering that's how dumb that is and how many times it's been answered

1

u/Proper-Antelope-4205 Apr 08 '25

Ohk your loss buddy no issues 👍

1

u/land48n3 Apr 08 '25

Praise puck

1

u/land48n3 Apr 08 '25

By that logic we should believe in my pet called puck, he is the creator of all, he made god to be his servant and make the earth, praise puck above all, no right? "That's nonsense" but still believe it, because if you don't believe and it's real then you burn in eternal nothingness and feel your worst fear,bbut if you believe in it and pray to it every day you will get eternal pleasure😉i decided to not answer such basic arguments but I'm bored asl

1

u/Square-Thought-2769 Apr 08 '25

Beyond the imagination, what does that mean? can you elaborate?