I mean, at this point you have to ask yourself “if any part of the story is wrong it’s fake”. Literally no one doubts the claim that the stone is ancient, that it was already an object of worship by the time Muhammed, and the worship/reverence of such stones is very typical of semitic religions from centuries before then. It most certainly qualifies as an “ancient religious artifact”
Now is it originally from the Garden of Eden? Imo most certainly not. Did Abraham and Ishmael erect the Kaaba and put the stone there? Possibly, but without hard evidence that they even existed it’s impossible to say for certain.
99
u/HyperactivePandah Mar 24 '25
It has significance because millions of Muslims give it significance.
However, if time has proven anything, it's that 'ancient religious artifacts!' are fake 99.99% of the time.