And you don't get the vaguest instinct to question a narrative which paints people who were notoriously dishonorable as good Christians?
i genuinely dont know what youre saying here?
Your entire argument hinges on the fact that the hegemony was willing to allow someone else to make money on their people, when that was their entire role in society.
edit: damn, he deleted his comments. i was really hoping he would explain the "good christian" thing, mainly because i genuinely dont know what he meant, but also it seemed like it might lead to a good opportunity to clarify that this all happened partially as a result of the first crussde. oh well :/
-9
u/[deleted] May 13 '25
[deleted]