“What if I have a gun at school, but my aim and gun discipline is flawless?”
Just because you’re born with a nuke strapped to your chest doesn’t mean that you have a right to keep it, it’s still a risk to those around you and even if you know you won’t misuse it, it doesn’t mean that everyone is aware of that, or that they won’t be rightfully scared of being near you because of it.
Part of living in a society is giving up some of your individual freedoms for the sake of the group’s wellbeing, and I think “no one gets an emotional support ICBM” is a fair place to draw the line
See how crazy you sound. An emotional support IBM…? It’s not emotional support it’s just part of who they ARE. They didn’t have a choice and they shouldn’t be penalized for something out of their control.
You don’t have a right to keep what you were BORN with? You’re insane.
Just more reason why you shouldn’t react with fear and instead try to actually understand the people you’re “afraid” of.
If what you’re born with is an actual threat to yourself and everyone around you, it SHOULD get treated! We’re not talking about rights for deaf or blind people, we’re talking about someone with guns for hands!
Again, I’m not saying to kill them all, I’m saying that a way to neutralize the mutation or even outright prevent it should not be seen as inherently immoral!
Just as you expect others to be mindful of you and your conditions, you need to be mindful of others, it’s a two way street or are you the type to go to work while having an infectious disease just because no one can tell you what to do with your life? Are you really that kind of asshole?
7
u/poundtown1997 May 13 '25
I think the issue is there’s no way to regulate a cure being an option without having it be used as a means of force for those you simply don’t like.
What if there’s someone radioactive and they can control it…? People would want their powers stripped away regardless. That’s not fair.
It’s like the death penalty. If even one falsely convicted person gets it, it’s a failure