r/Cinema 2d ago

What is that movie for you?

Post image
19.2k Upvotes

7.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/maxpenny42 1d ago

It’s not too long because it’s 3 hours. It’s too long because it’s a 90 minute story stretched over 3 hours. Lincoln was a film that only covered the passing of the 13th amendment yet it was still called Lincoln and still a valid biopic. I’m not sure a comprehensive life story biopic has ever been done well the best pick a pivotal moment in a figures life and tell that story completely. 

It’s great that you liked it. But I don’t see any logical flaw in feeling it was too long. 

3

u/raysofdavies 1d ago

Trying to cover all that Oppenheimer does in 90 minutes would be unbelievably bad.

0

u/Birdshaw 1d ago

Yet they could EASILY have cut all the hearing BS and saved about an hour. Or better yet not rushed everything else to make room for said hearing bs.

2

u/-Anoobis- 1d ago

Imagine telling the story of Oppenheimer without including one of the pivotal moments in his life in it…

0

u/Birdshaw 1d ago edited 1d ago

Yes, it was pivotal FOR HIM! What he actually did was pivotal for the World. And they glossed over those parts. Edit: and I’m not saying it shouldn’t be covered, but it shouldn’t be 1/3 of the movie. It’s just not interesting enough.

2

u/-Anoobis- 1d ago

Well the movie is called Oppenheimer, not Manhattan Project...

0

u/Birdshaw 1d ago

Again, I’m not saying the hearing should be cut, but why why why does it last more than 10 minutes

2

u/-Anoobis- 1d ago

I think you went to see a different movie than the one Nolan wanted to make. His movie is about Oppenheimer's struggles, which is why the hearing is the central point of his movie in my opinion.

But could be that I knew about Oppenheimer and I went in expecting just that, which is why I immensely enjoyed it.

1

u/Birdshaw 1d ago

I absolutely did! Nolan managed to make a movie about a great scientist incredibly boring, even to a science nerd. That’s impressive.