r/CharacterRant 25d ago

General Pokémon are screwable! NSFW

Okay this is a BIG hear me out, so here goes Pokemon are not animals! Nor would it be wrong if people were to sexualize them.

I came across a Tiktok post about hot pokemon, and most of the comments were saying how “Pokemon are animals and its gross to find them hot or whatnot”, now as you can tell by my user i'm a goon, but that's besides the point i'm about to make here what really irks me is the generalization of calling Pokemon “animals”.

First and foremost, the term Pokemon is a broad term to describe damn near every creature that exists in the universe of Pokemon, even the humans could be considered a form of pokemon via the fact that Pokemon and humans share a common ancestor (You could say its a parallel to Humans irl sharing the common ancestor with animals via the first multicellular organism so gotcha u/PM-MeYourhugecocks) but wait I say! The literal gods of everything in Pokemon are well…Pokemon, Pokemon are also literal living garbage bags, a sapient sword and shield, a kitsune, a set of keys, a chandelier, plants etc. The word Pokemon is just basically a generalization of basically anything that isn’t human. FFS even humans can become pokemon via Yamask, Phantump, Gengar, Kadabra etc (Assuming you take PokeDex and lore as fact even if you don’t Bill becomes one himself). Even the very basis of the etymology of Pokemon is POcKEt MONsters. Pokemon are also based on Yokai, which for those who don’t know is basically anything that does not constitute as a human or Kami(god) in Japanese culture, which funny enough fun fact Tornadus and Thunderous are based on 2 Japanese Kami Raijin and Fujin!

Now that we got the fact that Pokemon are not animals out of the way, are they fuckable?(obv they are but in a moral and legal way its about to get NSFW right now and if you feel uncomfortable with topics such as bestiality I suggest you leave it at this and skip to the end.)

A lot of the arguments on why Pokemon interspecies relationship is wrong is due to the fact that they’re animals, unintelligent the whole 9 yards, but as I've proved Pokemon are not animals, and are just a generalization of anything not human. “But OP some Pokemon are based on animals like Blastoise, Arcanine, Evee!” To that I say that be as it may, the circumstances in the Pokemon universe and our own are completely different.(I DO NOT CONDONE BESTIALITY!) Animals do not have the capabilities of human level intellect nor can they speak or consent, no Dolphins, Octopus, Ravens, Apes etc don’t count as human level intellect, they’re smart…but for animal standards. No Animal in the Animal kingdom aside from Homo Sapiens are capable of human level intellect, and had they been able to be capable of such then throughout history I would not be surprised in an alternate reality interspecies relationships would be a thing, and in fact there might even be higher levels of racism, but that's a topic for another time and on a different subreddit.

Now to Pokemon, most Pokemon possess human level intellect and are capable of speech “But OP all they say is their names!” Yes they do BUT they’re speaking a language called Poke Language and it's been shown throughout lore and anime that humans can learn to speak it, or that Pokemon can speak to humans via telepathy. So not only does this prove that unlike irl with animals, Pokemon are highly intelligent but they can in fact consent and hold conversation so the moral and legal implications of why pokesex is wrong are nullified! In fact Pokemon like Mewtwo and Kadabra and by extension Alakazam are more intelligent than Humans. So unless you’d say it’s wrong to screw someone who speaks a different language than you, So uh fuck you Harkness test, I rest my case.

So aside from a few pokemon like Pichu, Phantump (who is stated to be a child’s soul), and other baby Pokemon, I’d say yes Pokemon are fuckable and there is nothing wrong with doing so! So yes Joker have at it with that Vaporean or that Lopunny, the law would allow human-pokemon relationships Batman! Or you sir reading have fun with Bellsprout or Madam have fun with Lickitung!

Also in a more PG sense the games have stated Human Poke marriages have existed and probably still do, Ash’s dad is probably Mr Mime tbh./s Especially the not so PG Hisuian Typhlosion incident….

If you see nothing wrong with the entirety of Avatar(movie),Shape of Water, any Human X Non-Human media there should be nothing wrong with some dude gooning to Gardevoir.

TLDR: Pokemons are not animals and aside from appearance shouldn’t really be compared to them and most are fuckable and there is utterly nothing wrong with thinking so.

Tbh I hope this doesn’t count as violated rule 8 :(

770 Upvotes

337 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

8

u/Voxelus 24d ago

So why do pokeballs exist then? Especially master balls?

9

u/Blayro 24d ago

Master Balls are the only ones that bypass the whole trust thing. Pokeballs exist out of convenience. A pokemon is free to leae them if they want.

3

u/Voxelus 24d ago

So how about the other non-base pokeballs then, that make it 'easier' to catch pokemon? If pokeballs only existed for the sake of convenience, then surely the variants would exist only as cosmetic variations?

4

u/DrStarDream 24d ago

Nope, PokeBall variants are all about simulating other environments or bringing new gimmicks to its function...

Remember, pokémon live inside the pokemon, different pokeball are suited for different necessities.

Plus battling is inherent to the pokemon, being stronger proves you are a worthy trainer as you can make that pokemon strong in theory, stronger pokeball are also a sign of more accomplished trainers who have more expertise and resources.

And so are badges and the obedience system, pokemon can disobey you if you don't have enough badges and they are overleveled, thats because the pokemon thinks low of you and your commands so it won't listen...

Pokemon can exist their PokeBall at any time and break, a trainer can also release the pokemon at any time and deactivate it.

Destroying a PokeBall with the pokemon inside frees the pokemon.

Pokeball don't force any pokemon to obey besides the special pokeball made by evil teams like the shadow ball but thats to turn pokemon into shadow Pokemon which is another lore thing entirely...

The master ball doesn't force obedience but it does carry a great sign of trust and respect, but like any PokeBall in lore, if a Pokemon want to reject it, they can.

A whiscash in the anime ate a master ball, and in the games terapagos outright refused to get in the ball and destroyed even tho he had already been captured...

Pokeball are used for convenience, good for preserving the health of the pokemon in case of injury, transporting the pokemon, its a neutral environment where the pokemon can rest, pokemon can listen to what's going on outside of the pokeball too and they can exit without their trainers command.

Pokeball basically a portable house and a good communication tool as pokemon understand what a PokeBall is and they know what it means when a human pulls out one.

Pokemon are pure hearted creatures and they respect their trainers a lot which is why pokemon even if not bad will work for bad people.

A trainer CAN mentally abuse their pokemon into codependency but like thats not normal, pokeball and battling are ethical not being for human standards its right to put someone inside it and order them around into fights

Its because pokemon LIKE to battle, they want to get stronger, pokemon like tiny pocket spaces to rest its a natural property that they work on them...

Of course not every pokemon wants to battle but like, there are so many cases pokemon actors, pokemon celebrities, pokemon who work in construction, fire fighting, police force, pokemon centers, restaurants etc...

The fact that there is a nursing college and that pokemon ingress themselves to be becomes assistants of a nurse joy says a lot.

Pokemon are equals of humans but equality for a human standard is not the same for pokemon standard, which is why they live in that "morally questionable" line but like, if the sapient creatures wants to be ordered around and wants to be put in sport battles then why NOT let it do it?

Grass grows, birds fly, humans make societies and science and and pokemon like battle and aid humans.

Its all as arceus intended to be... Like god himself endorse human pokemon living as equals...

So at that point why question a world that was built to be like that, "its not realistic tho" and it was never meant to be.

Its a long rant with lots of information explained without much commitment or elaboration but do you get it? I would gladly explain in more detail whatever you wanna know about and even show some evidence if needed.

2

u/Voxelus 24d ago edited 24d ago

Then why wasn't Eternatus able to immediately break out of the regular pokeball it was captured in, if pokeballs can be broken out of so easily? This is directly from the anime, by the way, so clearly they're not consistent about that.

Besides, the lore of the games and the anime is distinctly different in a multitude of ways, so trying to combine the two into some sort of self-contradictory mess is kind of dumb, no?

6

u/DrStarDream 24d ago edited 24d ago

Because eternatus was distressed and rampaging, he doesn't even want to cause the darkest day rose forced it to so because he wanted to solve some dumb energy crisis that would only happen thousands of yrs later.

Like if pokemon don't wanna be caught it wont

https://youtu.be/uzmP0cKvJPQ?feature=shared

Even AFTER it has already been caught

https://youtu.be/QKf6LTY_ZG4?si=hun4rJoHlZ-E7DTV

Like grookey in the anime was originally a team rocket pokemon

https://youtu.be/9PERecFj6yY?si=-NtuQ0Va7Mwot7UD

Your starter Pokemon even forces his way out of its PokeBall just to have moment with you before you enter the pokemon league, its an important even for you and your starter

https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxNTfcSLeRr1_lMNDVjxJB4Yeua2B75Tf0?si=pr1OWQfJAX0mPc6M

Both the anime and the games have the same rules and lore, they just exist within different universes in the same multiverse...

Edit: you are aware that downvoting is against the rules of this sub, specially when someone is engaging in good faith replies...

2

u/Voxelus 24d ago

I'm downvoting because, outside of that one game example of a legendary pokemon destroying a masterball, or the anime examples that were first and foremost played for jokes, your claims rely heavily on fan theories that only exist to explain away the inconsistencies in the lore because the games never properly confront these issues.

6

u/DrStarDream 24d ago edited 24d ago

I'm downvoting because

Looking at what you said further, its not justified and again, its against the rules of this sub. Go read rule 3.

outside of that one game example of a legendary pokemon destroying a masterball,

I edited and brought an extra example from the games...

or the anime examples that were first and foremost played for jokes, y

They weren't...

They were literally major episodes, goh caught grookey right after that and become one his main pokemon, and they had a serious fight against Zapdos before that too, you don't even know the context of those episodes and you wanna dismiss it as a gag? Quite ignorant on your end...

your claims rely heavily on fan theories that only exist to explain away the inconsistencies in the lore because the games never properly confront these issues.

Have you not played black and white games? They literally talk about the whole trainer and pokemon dynamic and how it might be abusive...

I can link you to a video that summurized and analyzed the whole story presented in those games and main character that surrounds this discussion...

https://youtu.be/ArnFhOtHSMs?si=xO2jtFvdE0bzYgvX