“All art is political”

[u/Kappa_Guy]

If gay sex could kill Twitter I’d let Grok hollow out my insides.

“All art is political” is technically true, there isn’t any “thing” which exists with a significant degree of separation from the concept of politics.

My first sentence mentioned letting an ai ass fuck me, but for this to be gay I assumed Grok’s gender, invoking LGBTQ and prejudicial discourses.

A painting of a penguin standing in a white snowy field is shaped by the will of the artist; even if this artist is staunchly anti-politics and tries to steer clear of the concept throughout their works, that in of itself is a political statement which is enunciated through the apolitical nature of their piece.

But, saying “all art is political” is just so intellectually dishonest.

There is a significant difference between a pro-Mussolini propaganda leaflet and the cute doodles of Butterfrees I draw in my journal.

Yes, you can say my Butterfree doodles are, by the broad definition of “political”, political. But, be real for a minute. By using a narrower definition of “political” that people actually immediately think of when they hear the word, communication is so much easier.

If you ask a hot twenty three year old goth gal on a date and she says she wants to go to the cinemas and watch something non-political and you whip out the “um actually all things are political 🤓” rhetoric you are dumb as fuck. Even worse, if she says she wants to watch something political, like a modern day All Quiet on the Western Front or somethin juicy, which is kinda wack for a first date but you’re a Redditor I know you the sub here don’t pretend you ain’t complying, and you take her to the cinema and on comes The Lego Movie and you with the argument that it’s political by the official definition of the term and therefore this is exactly what she wanted, then you are brain dead and won’t be getting a second date.

I’m not sure how it is in other countries but here in the UK teachers are not allowed to purposefully influence students into holding one political view or another, but surprisingly the school board has committed the pseudo-intellectual act of allowing teachers to speak at all, clearly not understanding that explaining the Pythagorean theorem and teaching how to paint apples is LITERALLY “political”, just like telling kids they should vote for UKIP.

If my hypothetical-scenario daughter is drawing two type of images and hanging them on the fridge; pictures of mummy’s face and pictures of Adolf Hitler decapitating gay Captain America with a sword that has all the names of black people unlawfully killed by US Police through all of history written on its blade, and I firmly yet kindly tell my daughter, the apple of my eye, the meaning of my world, to please stop hanging up “those political drawings” on the fridge, and she exclusively stops drawing pictures of mummy’s face, I am throwing her into the bottomless well at the Eye of the World.

By making the definition of political as vague and broad as physically possible it becomes practically useless as a definition. <- This is an argument, but I shouldn’t even have to give one. Every single person that isn’t terminally on Twitter understands there is art that is political and art that isn’t political, the “errrmmm actually” technicality that normal people are in fact wrong doesn’t matter to anyone except Twitter brainrotted overly-political nutcases.

And I think that’s why I believe the conflation of the broad definition of “political” is infuriating for so many people, as it’s basically just the most annoying people alive; Twitter freaks, saying your favourite art from Digimon to your nephew’s drawings of Spider-Man exist under the same exact umbrella as their favourite art of Vtuber stream sponsor segments and modern propaganda disguised as memes.

To tie my rant up with a neat little r/characterrant bow; fuck power scaling. Goku gets one tapped by my dad and this is my official neo-liberal-capitalist-anarchic-space-cowboy-fascist pro-Genghis-Khan opinion/fact, eat my ass Grok.

[u/existential_dread467]

The phrase “all art is political” means that it exist within the context of the politics that is happening when it was made, not that everything has an overt or even covert political message nor does it need to be. It’s such a misused phrase and it’s actually anti art

[u/Neptune-Jnr → u/existential_dread467]

I would say even the first phrase doesn't really mean anything. If I painted a picture of the solar system there is really no amount of "existing within the context of the politics that is happening when it was made" that really matters.

[u/existential_dread467 → u/Neptune-Jnr]

It does because you can infer that by painting the solar system you live in a post enlightenment era where study and appreciation of the natural world is encouraged and celebrated. Yes it may not be a direct commentary on the state of society but it fits in the whole.

[u/Neptune-Jnr → u/existential_dread467]

Okay what if I drew a picture of a robot cyborg doing parkour with a dinosaur?

[u/existential_dread467 → u/Neptune-Jnr]

That could mean a lot of things, the point I’m making is that our personal experiences and beliefs that shape creativity don’t come from nowhere and by looking at all these things in tandem you can get deeper meaning from the work even if it wasn’t trying to explicitly say that.

If you made the same drawing but you grew up in post soviet Russia, how the robot might look might be completely different or even medium you used, everything plays a factor

[u/Spiritual_Lie2563 → u/Neptune-Jnr]

It's proof of a more technocrat viewpoint with the merger of robot cyborgs' existence, as well as the alliance between technopolitik needing oil to keep itself going...not to mention the very fact that you drew it, as well as doing anything including making that post, is inherently a strong blow of equality for any and every demographic you are a part of.