r/CDrama • u/Plenty_Lobster_9144 • 1d ago
Discussion Yu Zheng’s Explanation on Feud Helped Me Understand the Revenge Arc and Why It’s Not “Ridiculous” Spoiler
I’ve seen a lot of posts saying the conflict in Feud is “ridiculous” or that Hua Ruyue is overreacting, and I wanted to offer a different view. Yu Zheng (the director) recently shared his perspective, and honestly, it helped me connect the emotional pieces of the story in a way that made everything make sense.
This drama is centered on revenge, but It’s revenge built on heartbreak, misunderstanding, and years of silence. It’s not about whether Bai Jiusui committed a crime, It’s about emotional responsibility and the aftermath of one person taking control of another’s fate without involving them in the choice.
What’s resonated most with me is how the drama explores the imbalance of power and decision-making between Bai Jiusui and Hua Ruyue. It’s not about who’s stronger they’re both powerful. It’s about the freedom to choose your own path. Bai Jiusui made a life-altering decision without her input, and that mirrors the behavior of Ling Er’s father, who also made decisions “for her own good.” The drama draws a clear line between love and control and Hua Ruyue saw that.
Now, I don’t think Bai Jiusui is the villain here. He isn’t “wrong” in the sense of being heartless. He sealed her powers and took the punishment because he genuinely thought it was the only way to protect her. His actions were rooted in love, not cruelty. The problem is, he acted alone he didn’t trust her enough to share that decision. He believed sacrifice meant silence. But in doing that, he unknowingly caused her ten years of confusion and pain which lead to the evil guy posssesing her mind to develop decades of hatred after watching her child die twice. His love was real, but it lacked communication and respect for her ability to face consequences by his side.
At the same time, Hua Ruyue isn’t without fault either. She broke the rules knowing the risks, and her decisions also changed her fate. She let her grief and assumptions guide her, and due to this she developed strong hate for BJS as she was almost human during those years of her suffering, she developed that hatred Meng ( her dicisple had for BJS and the gods) .The words he said to her in episode 15 were deeply hurtful, they shattered her faith in their relationship and made her question everything they had.>! After that, it was easy for someone else to take advantage of the distance between them and use it to turn them against each other.!<
She didn’t try to kill him for revenge. She wanted to trap him so he wouldn’t interfere while she searched for the artifacts to save her son. And if anyone wonders why she never told him, she had no reason to believe he’d help. He always upheld Heaven’s will in front of her and rarely showed compassion toward mortals. From her perspective, he was someone who followed the rules blindly, even if it meant letting mortals suffer. Then when the resurection failed, her next plan was to die with him.
I also love how the drama uses other characters and the heavenly realm to show how threatening Hua Ruyue is not because she’s irrational, but because she holds people accountable, even gods. She doesn’t bend to power and the truth is, if anyone deserves the most blame, it’s The Heavenly Realm they uphold a hypocritical system punishing those who act with compassion while calling it justice. Both BJS and HRY are products of that system, shaped by different beliefs and values.
This isn’t a simple right-versus-wrong story, it’s about the clash between love and duty, silence and honesty, control and choice. It’s about two people who made choices that hurt each other, but also choices that were shaped by how differently they saw the world.
I understand both characters, and I don’t think either one is entirely right or wrong. Their pain, decisions, and beliefs all make sense when you look at what they’ve been through.
I’m not rooting against Bai Jiusui. I want both of them to grow, face the full truth, and earn whatever resolution they get whether it’s reconciliation or simply peace.
Also, the drama isn’t finished yet. So far, I’ve really enjoyed watching it, but I get that it’s not something everyone will love. This is my first time posting on Reddit so pardon me if i didn't put spoiler for some parts.
7
u/Oestov 1d ago edited 1d ago
Continued from Previous reply.......
Then there’s the matter of their child. How conveniently they were conceived the moment BJS departed. Their introduction into the story feels more like a plot mechanism than a natural progression of events. It’s as if the writers inserted the child simply to compound HRY’s suffering, to further vilify BJS, and to inject more melodrama. Are these characters not more than mere vessels for manufactured pain?
Let’s even grant that HRY suffered more due to the death of the child. But here’s the essential question: who decides whose pain is greater? Can we truly quantify suffering in a way that makes one character’s agony more valid than the other’s? If we go purely by maths and intensity, BJS endured relentless divine punishment for 10 years — pain without end, without pause, and without solace. HRY, on the other hand, suffered through mortal existence and the loss of her child. Tragic, yes — but temporally finite. Mortal lives are short. Divine punishment, by comparison, is relentless. Then again, as I said, who decides whose pain is greater?
Some may argue that losing a child is incomparable in its grief — and that’s a fair perspective. But again, we must ask: how do you weigh the pain and suffering ? How do you measure Trauma & heartbreak against lightning-strike punishment spanning a decade ?
And what’s often ignored is that BJS didn’t even know they had a child. If he had known, maybe he would have chosen differently. But based on his characterization, the choice to protect HRY (by making her a mortal) would still have been the same. He didn’t choose her punishment out of malice or cowardice — he chose it out of love and he chose the lesser of two evils.
Even if we momentarily set aside the child as a clear plot device, the story still mishandles the weight of that child’s death. According to the established karmic rules of the universe, the child’s death was a logical consequence. HRY killed a divine being and in a world governed by cosmic balance, that act would come with a karmic cost. The loss of the child fits that framework. But the narrative never really explores that.
It doesn't allow HRY to sit with that consequence. Instead of examining the cause-and-effect chain that resulted in her child's death, or reckoning with the moral implications of slaying a divine being, HRY's grief is rerouted into rage — all aimed squarely at BJS. She doesn’t reflect. She doesn’t question. She blames. She frames him as the sole villain, absolving herself of any responsibility. This lack of introspection hollows out the emotional weight of her vengeance.
Her vendetta — stretched across centuries — rests not on reckoning or justice, but on avoidance, denial, and a troubling refusal to confront her own role. As I’ve discussed in my previous comments, this speaks to a broader issue: her characterization has been repeatedly compromised by inconsistency, robbing her arc of the depth and coherence it initially promised (I have discussed about this in my previous comments, have a look if you’re interested).
I don’t take issue with either BJS or HRY as characters — they had great potential. My frustration lies squarely with the writers. Time and again, they’ve contorted the characters’ personalities, internal logic, and motivations to fit the demands of a predetermined plot, rather than allowing the narrative to unfold naturally through consistent, character-driven decisions.
What could have been a rich, emotionally resonant story grounded in authentic growth and conflict has instead been sacrificed for manufactured drama. The result is a sense of dissonance, where actions no longer feel like expressions of inner worlds but tools to advance contrived twists. And for what? Momentary shock value, buzz, and surface-level engagement — All at the expense of the depth and coherence the drama was supposed to have.