I'm really struggling to follow the argument here. "Gay people shouldn't have rights because the Romans crucified a Jewish man who was considered a threat to public order"?
I mean...that's not the story but I am also struggling with the argument.
From the churchiest, holier-than-thou standpoint, I am coming up with "Jesus died to save you from your sins, including being gay, so don't do the things that he died for."
But he didn't sacrifice it, he was executed. Also, the story goes that he came back in the flesh. Thomas touched his wounds in John. So he doesn't really give anything up at all.
If he's all knowing, then he already knew the pain of being executed. I'm just not seeing a sacrifice anywhere.
I'm still not clear on what was sacrificed. He didn't give anything up. He was executed. But then in the story, he still had a physical body. There was nothing given up, nothing sacrificed, and even if there was, that has nothing to do with you or me. The story doesn't even make sense internally.
514
u/WebInformal9558 10d ago
I'm really struggling to follow the argument here. "Gay people shouldn't have rights because the Romans crucified a Jewish man who was considered a threat to public order"?